Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sorkh TV | سرخ تیوی

Channel

Sorkh TV | سرخ تیوی

@SORKH_TV1

Not marked by Telegram, checked 31 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,690subscribers

-45 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002212332957
TypeChannel
Username@SORKH_TV1
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SORKH_TV1

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,6903,7353,712.530 August 2026 — 3,735 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,735 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,725 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,709 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,700 subscribers17 September 2026 — 3,690 subscribers30 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 18 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,683–3,742 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 06:593,690-10
13 Sept 2026, 04:413,700-9
8 Sept 2026, 20:583,709-16
3 Sept 2026, 17:363,725-10
31 Aug 2026, 02:083,735no change
30 Aug 2026, 12:153,735first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.95%
avg views ÷ 3,690 subscribers
Avg views / post
367
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total7,342
Reactions total351
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

351 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20357.8%
👍8925.4%
👏329.12%
🔥277.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 351 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC199 views11 reactionsread 30 August 2026

https://t.me/SorkhTimes/139187 بهش یاد بدید قبل دربی هیچ بازیکنی رو نکوبه خواهشا مودبانه یاد بدید

11

29 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC206 views14 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

حسین چراغی عرزشی سگ‌ مدیریت فرقی نداره درویش یا حدادی یا بعدی ایشون سگ هستن به هرحال ایشون سال پیش از ایجنت باکیچ مبلغی رو گرفت که از این بازیکن تعریف کنه و الان چون نیمکت نشین شده به جایگزیناش فحاشی میکنه

👍14

29 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC232 views19 reactionsread 30 August 2026

گل سومو زدیم بیفوما رو بکش بیرون سرگیف محبی همه رو وقت کمه باید استراحت کافی بکنن بازیکنا #Nima 🔴STV |@SORKH_TV1 ♦️Red Never Stops

18👍1

29 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC240 views18 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

۴۵ دقیقه دیگه بازی شروع میشه به امید برد مکتب پاک پرسپولیس #جاوید_نام_مانی_صفرپور

18

28 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC304 views24 reactionsread 30 August 2026

اقای تارتار مغزه پوکتو راه بنداز فردا ۴۵ دقیقه اول جوری هجومی بازی کن که بازیکنای فیکستو نیمه دوم بکشی بیرون استراحت کنن #Nima 🔴STV |@SORKH_TV1 ♦️Red Never Stops

👍24

28 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC304 views27 reactionsread 30 August 2026

حامد لک با شرف 🔥👑 #Nima 🔴STV |@SORKH_TV1 ♦️Red Never Stops

🔥27

28 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC332 views0 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Poll

بهترین خرید دوران حدادی

  1. زارع48%
  2. ایری15%
  3. سرگیف44%
  4. محبی39%
  5. شهرابادی6%
  6. هیچکدام5%

The shares total 157%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC371 views16 reactionsread 30 August 2026

از مدیران پرسیدم با فراز امامعلی صحبت کردین جواب دادن : فیکه نه ما صحبتی نکردیم

16

26 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC413 views13 reactionsread 30 August 2026

فکر کنم نمیتونن و نقل و انتقالات تموم میشه البته این فکر منه

13

26 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC461 views18 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#اختصاصی_سرخ_تیوی ♦️ اخرین خبرها در رابطه با خرید جدید با عضوه هیئت مدیره

18

26 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC404 views14 reactionsread 30 August 2026

#اختصاصی_سرخ_تیوی 🔴 مرتضی فاضلی هافبک دفاعی استقلال خوزستان درحال مذاکرات نهایی برای حضور در تراکتور سازی #Nima 🔴STV |@SORKH_TV1 ♦️Red Never Stops

👍131

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SORKH_TV1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTCAnonymous Poll163 voters

بهترین خرید دوران حدادی

  1. زارع48%
  2. ایری15%
  3. سرگیف44%
  4. محبی39%
  5. شهرابادی6%
  6. هیچکدام5%

The shares total 157%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

بدريون الاخبارية
@ALJNUB2 · 31,921
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 19 September 2026
شهرزیبای من بابلسر
@Babolsariha · 29,775
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
صفحه اقتصاد
@safheeghtesad · 102,121
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sorkh TV | سرخ تیوی” (@SORKH_TV1), 3,690 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SORKH_TV1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.