Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

S0NDERTAROT

@SONDERTAR

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

132subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002706622436
TypeChannel
Username@SONDERTAR
Descriptionправда, даже если она горькая
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/SONDERTAR

Growth

13212 Aug 2026, 03:17 — 132 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 03:30 — 132 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 03:1712 Aug 2026, 03:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 131–133 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:30132no change
12 Aug 2026, 03:17132first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 11 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
67.3%
avg views ÷ 132 subscribers
Avg views / post
88.9
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held15 (11 May 20262 August 2026)
Views total889
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
103
Videos
10
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
19s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53710716183007899661720.2%
custom 54025637315592950891619.0%
custom 53710204437654605371315.5%
custom 5260567255145539253910.7%
custom 542476260933108702689.52%
custom 547428895955302111089.52%
custom 525154349449690869167.14%
custom 542479331405228476644.76%
custom 519502263970957331133.57%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC78 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54742889595530211102

1 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC80 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

тест на интуицию почувствуй карту «суд»

1 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC85 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ кто или что у вас на пороге? Думайте о себе, а после выбирайте карту, которая больше всего тянет. Номер напишите в комментариях. 20 реакций - трактовка

custom 540256373155929508912custom 537102044376546053710custom 53710716183007899669

25 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC119 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

фух 10 часов назад учить начала уже профи

custom 54742889595530211102custom 53710716183007899661

25 Jul 2026, 04:16 UTC119 viewsread 12 August 2026

привет на ком натальную карьу практиковать

9 Jul 2026, 01:27 UTC228 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 51950226397095733112custom 52605672551455392531custom 54247626093310870261

5 Jul 2026, 21:11 UTC246 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

▫️Ночь Ивана Купалы (с 6 на 7 июля) Издавна считалось, что именно в эту ночь девушки гадали на любовь, суженого, будущего мужа, замужество и свою судьбу. По народным поверьям эта ночь особенно подходит для вопросов о личной жизни, чувствах и будущем отношений. узнаем о вашем будущем с этим человеком? 👀@kwssgs

custom 52515434944969086913custom 54025637315592950892custom 51950226397095733111custom 52605672551455392531custom 53710204437654605371custom 54247626093310870261

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @SONDERTAR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,047,453 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“S0NDERTAROT” (@SONDERTAR), 132 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SONDERTAR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.