Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for π—¦π—’π—Ÿπ—¦π—§π—œπ—§π—œπ—¨π—  𝗖𝗒𝗨π—₯𝗧

Channel

π—¦π—’π—Ÿπ—¦π—§π—œπ—§π—œπ—¨π—  𝗖𝗒𝗨π—₯𝗧

@SOLSTITIUMCOURT

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

183subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001873281911
TypeChannel
Username@SOLSTITIUMCOURT
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SOLSTITIUMCOURT

Growth

18311 Aug 2026, 17:16 β€” 183 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 11:28 β€” 183 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 17:1612 Aug 2026, 11:28
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 182–184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:28183no change
11 Aug 2026, 17:16183first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
16.9%
avg views Γ· 183 subscribers
Avg views / post
30.9
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 July 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total618
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC33 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

─── SURAT HAK CIPTA ─── ROLEPLAYER, 03-08-26 βš–οΈ Nama Instansi : Sylven Guard Kingdom βš–οΈ Username Instansi : @sylvenkingdom βš–οΈ Jenis Instansi : Kerajaan βš–οΈ Tanggal Berdiri : 25 Juli 2026 Dengan adanya surat ini, @SOLSTITIUMCOURT menyatakan bahwa hal yang berkaitan dengan instansi tersebut murni ciptaan instansi tersebut. Solstitium Court akan melindungi segala hal yang berkaitan dan jika instansi tersebut melakuka…

19 Jul 2026, 03:48 UTC46 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

kesimpulannya, AI itu seharusnya jadi asisten, bukan malah menggantikan posisi kreator manusia secara penuh. jangan sampai alasan 'biar cepat' malah menghilangkan esensi belajar dan keaslian instansi kalian sendiri. yuk, warga rp, kita dukung dan hargai karya para editor-editor yang ada di rp yang sudah capek-capek asah skill mereka. terima kasih sudah menyimak edukasi dari Solstitium Court hari ini. sampai jumpa di…

19 Jul 2026, 03:46 UTC44 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

hasil AI itu polanya mirip-mirip karena mereka mengambil sumber dari data yang sama. kalau semua instansi di rp cuma modal prompt AI, lama-lama visual instansi di rp bakalan terlihat seragam, monoton, dan gak punya jiwa atau signature style yang membedakan satu instansi dengan instansi lainnya. bayangkan suatu hari nanti platform AI yang biasa kalian pakai itu berbayar mahal, down, atau diblokir. kalau kalian cuma b…

19 Jul 2026, 03:42 UTC33 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

dampak selain mematikan potensi editor, tahu gak sih apa bahayanya buat diri kita sendiri kalau kerjaannya cuma bisa nge-prompt AI terus-menerus? nih, SOC jabarkan dampaknya yang wajib kalian renungkan. saat kita terbiasa tinggal ketik prompt pendek lalu keluar hasil instan, otak kita berhenti dilatih untuk memecahkan masalah. kita gak tahu cara mengatur komposisi warna yang pas, cara menentukan lighting, atau cara …

19 Jul 2026, 03:40 UTC29 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

lagipula, aturan ini dibuat justru untuk melindungi kalian. bayangkan kalau kalian capek-capek bangun konsep instansi, lalu besoknya ada orang lain tinggal ketik prompt AI selama 5 detik untuk meniru persis visual instansi kalian, lalu mereka klaim itu milik mereka. sakit hati gak? pasti sakit hati, kan? nah, di sinilah SOC hadir untuk mengunci celah itu agar hal tersebut tidak terjadi. Next, kita langsung bahas dam…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SOLSTITIUMCOURT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 348,941 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ—¦π—’π—Ÿπ—¦π—§π—œπ—§π—œπ—¨π—  𝗖𝗒𝗨π—₯𝗧” (@SOLSTITIUMCOURT), 183 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SOLSTITIUMCOURT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.