Channel
@SMS_BOMBAFKAN
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,804subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001777426906 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SMS_BOMBAFKAN |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 24 May 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SMS_BOMBAFKAN |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 2,804 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 2,808 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 2,806 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 2,805 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 2,805 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
981 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 670 | 68.3% | |
| ❤ | 125 | 12.7% | |
| 🤩 | 70 | 7.14% | |
| 🎉 | 56 | 5.71% | |
| 🥰 | 39 | 3.98% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 2.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 981reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2022 to 8 September 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سلام خدمت تمامی کاربران عزیز دوستان خیلیا گفتن چرا دیگه شات و ویس هایی که ثابت میکنی معتبری نمیزارید😐 همون طور که اطلاع دارید درگاه اینترنتی اضافه کردیم به ربات راحت میتونید اشتراک مورد نظر را خریدار کنید 🙂 به همین دلیل دیگه نمیتونیم شات بگیریم ممنون که درک میکنید ❤️ @SMS_BOMBER_100BOT
👍287❤44🤩39🥰28🎉26👏12
خیلی ممنون از این دوست عزیزمون ایشون چند روز پیش پیام داده بودن به دلیل حجم زیاد پیام ها ندیدم الان که چک کردم دیدمش ❤️❤️ حضور شما باعث افتخار ماست ممنون که حمایت میکنید 🎊 واقعا این جور پیاما و حمایت ها به ما انرژی میده دم همتون گرم که همه جوره بنده رو همراهی میکنید 💚 @SMS_BOMBER_100BOT
👍135❤37🎉18🤩17🥰11👏9
دوستان با توجه به شرایطی ک هست قیمت هاست هامون و دامنه ها گرون شده قراره یکی دو روز آینده قیمت اشتراک بره بالا کسایی ک میخوان خرید کنن زودتر انجام بدن @sMs_Bomber_100Bot
👍32🤩7🎉5❤3
با سلام خدمت تمامی کاربران عریز ربات اسمس بمب افکن✋ دوستان در طی چند روز اخیر در حال کار بر روی اشتراک ویژه خودکار بودیم و بلخره موفق شدیم. 🤠 از این به بعد میتونید با صورت خودکار اشتراک بخرید 🙂 وقتی دستور 💶 هزینه VIP 💶 رو داخل ربات ارسال کردید بعد روی هر کدام از لینک های مربوط به اشتراک بزنید همون جا هدایت میشید به درگاه پرداخت معتبر نکست پی و وقتی پول رو پرداخت کردید برگردید به ربات و روی دکمه حساب کاربری کلیک ک…
👍43❤7🎉3
#رضایت
❤16👍7
Voice message, posted without a caption
👍26🤩3
رضایت اشتراک ویژه دائمی 🍃 مشتری راضی بوده ویس داد که پایین میزارمش ✅ حضور شما باعث افتخار ماست 🔱 برای خرید اشتراک ویژه ربات اسمس بمبر به ایدی @HACK_0_2 پیام بدید 👨💻
👍21❤3
دوستان از این به بعد فقط کسایی که میتونن ویس بدن ما میزاریم برای اعتماد... مردم دیگه به شات ها اعتماد نمیکنن
👍44
ربات رو از اول استارت کنید دیتابیس ربات تغییر یافت ....♻️ @sMs_Bomber_100Bot
👍18
#رضایت
❤9🎉4👍3
Voice message, posted without a caption
👍15
رضایت خرید اشتراک ویژه 10 روزه ❤️ مشتری راضی بوده ویس هم داده 💎 اعتماد شما اعتبار ماست 💚 جهت خرید حساب ویژه ( VIP ) بات اسمس بمبر 💣 به ایدی زیر پیام بدید 👇 👉👉👉 @HACK_0_2
👍14🤩3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SMS_BOMBAFKAN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SMS_BOMBAFKAN named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مشتری های راضی” (@SMS_BOMBAFKAN), 2,804 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SMS_BOMBAFKAN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.