Channel
@SL_Feedback
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
5subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003996976278 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SL_Feedback |
| Created | 22 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SL_Feedback |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:59 | 5 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 6 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 5 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 5 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 60.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Good morning, everyone! ☀️ Meanwhile, our winner has shown up. The guy didn't even expect it all to be this easy 😅 By the way — he's open to chatting with you. If you want to learn about his trading experience, feel free to reach out.
❤1
The guy took his $500 in 4 days. Not bad, wouldn't you agree? 😎 And yeah — those who reach out to us personally often get the latest updates much earlier. So if you want to discuss our system, ask questions, or leave feedback — we're waiting for you👇
A participant in our project just allowed himself what he'd been dreaming of for a long time. Why not — we deserve more 😎
❤1
🏆 Just a few kind words from one of our partners. The guy spent years wasting time on manual trading — and finally found the right place in 2026. We can only be happy for him 💪🔥
🔥1
Congratulations to our participant on his first profit withdrawal 👍 It's a big step forward for him, and we're confident he'll achieve even more in the future. By the way, you can share your feedback with us in support — we're always happy to hear from you 🤝
‼️ You don't need to be a genius 🧠 You don't need perfect conditions. The main thing is the will to do it. We'll help with the rest. When a person stops doubting and simply starts taking action, not only does their balance grow — their self‑confidence does too. But let's be clear: we only work with those who truly want it and are ready. Serious approach only, guys 💯 If you want to build result‑oriented trading — j…
👍1
Posted without readable text
🫶 Our participant Ben doubled his deposit in literally one day — and it seems he still doesn't fully grasp the scale of what this system can do. We're sure he'll figure it out very soon 😏
❤1
Hey! 👋 Here, we'll be posting reviews from the guys who are already taking part in our work. Each of them can serve as an example for beginners. By the way, if you'd like to leave a review — write here 👇
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @SL_Feedback. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Signal Lite| FEEDBACK of Users” (@SL_Feedback), 5 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SL_Feedback.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.