Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SHIZ и Милка

Channel

SHIZ и Милка

@SHIZ584

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,488subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001990711090
TypeChannel
Username@SHIZ584
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SHIZ584

Growth

5,4715,4885,479.57 August 2026 — 5,476 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,475 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,471 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,484 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,488 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,468–5,491 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 16:095,488+4
14 Aug 2026, 18:485,484+13
11 Aug 2026, 11:065,471-4
8 Aug 2026, 05:035,475-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:185,476first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 18 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.9%
avg views ÷ 5,488 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,620
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held15 (18 March 20268 August 2026)
Views total10,850
Reactions total231
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,254 reactions across 15 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
63650.7%
custom 519041969319367675219215.3%
❤‍🔥13210.5%
🎉594.70%
🍓554.39%
💊554.39%
🤨514.07%
🔥201.59%
🤩161.28%
🤔120.957%
🌭60.478%
🤯50.399%
🦄50.399%
💅30.239%
🤗30.239%
🍌20.159%
🗿20.159%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 15 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SHIZ584. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 March 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC≈2,360 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хочу рассказать вам про летний эксперимент Димы Савостьянова, где он работал на 3 удаленных работах в американских стартапах одновременно. В далеком прошлом он делал GOSU AI — голосового помощника для игроков в Dota 2, который зародился на просторах ODS в 2017 году. Дима пришел туда после ФКН ВШЭ на позицию ML Engineer, дорос до CPO, а в 2021 году компанию купил Сбер. Но работать в Сбере ему было мало. В 2023 году

💊50custom 519041969319367675215🍓42

8 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈2,610 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/hrnfMVMxCzo?si=O_nV2sUprI6nR9ku В новом ролике в формате реакции на протяжении 50 минут рассуждаю на тему того, как стоит и не стоит обучать математике детей и взрослых

38❤‍🔥9🦄4custom 51904196931936767523

25 Jul 2026, 17:39 UTC≈5,880 views106 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Решил записать небольшое пояснение к недавно опровергнутой (для n≥3) гипотезе якобиана. Рассказал, в чём она заключается + в чём особенность построенного контрпримера. Не забывайте подписываться на Шизильню. Большую часть материала брал из блога одного из лучших математиков мира, Теренса Тао: https://terrytao.wordpress.com/ Ещё желающие могут посмотреть, как Теренс Тао общается с ChatGPT о данной математической зад

custom 51904196931936767525628🍓15🍌2🔥2🤯2❤‍🔥1

19 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC≈6,600 views117 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Всем здравствуйте Мной было принято решение создать второй YouTube-канал, который называется "Шизильня". Там я буду выпускать гораздо более разнообразный (как мне кажется) и неформальный (как мне кажется) контент. Так что подписывайтесь на Шизильню И я уже сделал первый ролик, где порассуждал о развитии математической мысли в масштабах человечества, а также об обучении математике в современных реалиях https://yout

80❤‍🔥20custom 519041969319367675213🍓2🤗2

10 May 2026, 14:37 UTC≈10,800 views103 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Примерно через 50 минут (в 18:30 по мск) постримлю решения задач с первого этапа ШАДа в том количестве, на которое сил хватит. https://youtube.com/live/YVH5JrQ0GnE https://youtube.com/live/YVH5JrQ0GnE https://youtube.com/live/YVH5JrQ0GnE

🎉5931custom 519041969319367675213

7 May 2026, 16:10 UTC≈10,100 views72 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

03:07:42 Задача 20 Достаточно стандартная задача из темы вычисления производной решения ОДУ по параметру. Хотя с другой стороны далеко не в каждом вузе эта тема входит в перечень тем стандартного курса ОДУ. 03:22:31 Задача 21 (производная решения ОДУ по параметру) Аналогично задаче 20, но тут пришлось вспомнить о том, что иногда стоит обращаться к теореме о существовании и единственного задачи Коши. 03:41:11 Задача

❤‍🔥4812custom 51904196931936767529🤯3

7 May 2026, 16:09 UTC≈5,330 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Впервые решил написать о структуре ролика тут в ТГ, чтобы вы осознали масштаб проделанной работы. 00:00:00 Вступление 00:06:49 Задача 1 Задача школьного уровня, где нужно нарисовать графики производной и интеграла от свободно начерченного графика. 00:14:47 Задача 2 В некотором смысле уже легендарная задача. Необходимо вычислить предел отношения двух разностей аналитических функций. Существует лобовое решение в вид

27❤‍🔥12

7 May 2026, 16:09 UTC≈8,070 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Использованная литература

36custom 519041969319367675210❤‍🔥6

7 May 2026, 16:05 UTC≈7,090 views195 reactions7 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сначала мужчины говорят, что у них нет депрессии, а потом выпускают 10-часовой ролик с решениями задач из печально известного Тривиума Арнольда. Тривиум Арнольда — это неформальный сборник из 100 фундаментальных математических задач, который составил выдающийся математик Владимир Арнольд и опубликовал в своей статье "Тривиум". Сборник охватывает различные области: от алгебры и геометрии до теории вероятностей, теори

162🤩16custom 51904196931936767528❤‍🔥7🔥2

7 May 2026, 16:04 UTC≈4,920 views101 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

У меня нет депрессии

🤨51custom 519041969319367675223🤔11🌭5💅32❤‍🔥2🗿2

8 Apr 2026, 20:09 UTC≈8,290 views69 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Внеформатный ролик от меня с визуальным ответом на вопрос о том, почему математика красива. https://youtu.be/yt7w4klnO-w https://youtu.be/yt7w4klnO-w https://youtu.be/yt7w4klnO-w

52🍓10custom 51904196931936767527

29 Mar 2026, 17:26 UTC≈7,950 views99 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Решил сделать небольшой ролик с рассуждением на тему свободы воли. Рекомендую поддержать его, если хотите, чтобы я время от времени выпускал ролики не только про математику. https://youtu.be/UO_cAvEcfNU https://youtu.be/UO_cAvEcfNU https://youtu.be/UO_cAvEcfNU

73🍓11custom 51904196931936767528💊5🌭1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @SHIZ584. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 853,044 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SHIZ и Милка” (@SHIZ584), 5,488 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SHIZ584.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.