Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Singapore Largest Telegram Network Groups/Community

@SGTGN

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

8,065subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001386708466
TypeChannel
Username@SGTGN
DescriptionStay connected with us by joining/subscribing to us @SGTGN Your 1 stop place to link up with Singapore Largest Telegram Groups!
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 3 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SGTGN

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

8,0658,0738,0696 August 2026 — 8,072 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,072 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,073 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,067 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,065 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,064–8,074 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:188,065-2
9 Aug 2026, 07:118,067-6
6 Aug 2026, 14:148,073+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:208,072no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:198,072first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 May 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
22
Videos
3
Links
52

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
55s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

14 Feb 2025, 15:19 UTC≈55,200 viewsread 12 August 2026

⚠️ Some of the scams featured infographics prompting victims to claim their CDC vouchers through a fake RedeemSG website link. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/cdc-vouchers-scams-fake-websites-infographics-government-payouts-4939231 🚨 Should you see any of the scam post, reply the post @admin to alert our SGTGN admin

3 May 2024, 05:51 UTC≈43,800 viewsread 12 August 2026

⚠️ WARNING TO ALL MEMBERS IN TELEGRAM! Many had reported being scammed or Telegram account being hacked. Share/Forward this post to your friends/groups to remind each other! Scam Trend in Telegram ⛔ Never ever Paynow/Transfer any money to Telegram users. After you send the money, that's it. You will never get back. ⛔ Never click on any websites that will leads you to insert your telegram mobile number and then fol

10 Mar 2024, 05:17 UTC≈33,900 viewsread 12 August 2026

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/at-least-47-people-tricked-by-scammers-into-revealing-singpass-credentials-since-january 🚨Job scam advisory 🚨. ⚠️ Any jobs ads procedure that required to access singpass or change details(especially mobile) on singpass are SCAMMERS. Do not proceed. Report to us!

1 Jan 2024, 03:47 UTC≈89,500 viewsread 12 August 2026

⚠️SGTGN admins are trying to clean up and to restore our Spa & Massage Relax Main Group chat @sgRelax due to extensive child porn/scam accounts. We have created alternative NEW ads & listings group @sgRelaxAds while cleaning/restoring old group Kindly support us by joining and adding your friends to @sgRelaxAds @sgRelaxAds @sgRelaxAds Look for Spa & Massage Relaxation in Singapore

31 Dec 2023, 03:42 UTC≈199,000 viewsread 12 August 2026

⚠️ Spa & Massage Relax Main Group chat @sgRelax is currently doing an intensive cleanup for porn/scam accounts. We have created another NEW ads & listings group @sgRelaxAds Kindly please proceed to @sgRelaxAds @sgRelaxAds @sgRelaxAds Look for Spa & Massage Relaxation in Singapore

3 Oct 2023, 12:34 UTC≈34,400 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Gun shots in Bangkok Siam Paragon by 14 yo boy https://fb.watch/nrGP2vIZuL/ Join @ThaiNightLife for any updates by members

31 Aug 2023, 13:59 UTC≈52,300 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Singapore President Election 2023 (Telegram Members, who will you vote?)

  1. TKL13%
  2. NKS34%
  3. TM16%
  4. All 3, TKL,NKS,TM5%
  5. Spoilt Vote17%
  6. Not eligible to vote15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2023, 04:05 UTC≈24,700 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ WARNING ⚠️ 🚨 Phishing websites that impersonates Web Telegram. ℹ️ Telegram account being hijacked when users visited the following websites. Please check and set up 2 step verification code on Telegram to secure your own account. Visit https://www.androidpolice.com/top-tips-using-telegram-safely-securely/ for more tips on Telegram. Below are some example of fake website that require you to login and put in OTP s

29 Jul 2023, 11:38 UTC≈169,000 viewsread 12 August 2026

⚠️ WARNING ⚠️ 🚨 Phishing websites that impersonates Web Telegram. ℹ️ Telegram account being hijacked when users visited the following websites. Please check and set up 2 step verification code on Telegram to secure your own account. Visit https://www.androidpolice.com/top-tips-using-telegram-safely-securely/ for more tips on Telegram. Below are some example of fake website that require you to login and put in OTP s

22 Sept 2021, 23:04 UTC≈50,500 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @SGUpdatePhoto

Wednesday’s new cases surpassed the total infections recorded in April 20 last year, when there were 1,426, most of them involving migrant workers staying in dormitories. ➡️ https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/record-high-1457-new-covid-19-cases-newly-reported-cluster-woodlands-dormitory @sgUpdate @sgTalk @sgVirus

2 Jul 2021, 11:41 UTC≈29,000 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

FOOD FOOD FOOD All about SG Food Craving Join the network and community now @Where2Eat Http://t.me/Where2Eat (ALL FOOD SHARING WILL BE DIVERTED THERE) It's now on @SGTGN network!

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @SGTGN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Aug 2023, 13:59 UTCAnonymous Poll6,080 voters approx.

Singapore President Election 2023 (Telegram Members, who will you vote?)

  1. TKL13%
  2. NKS34%
  3. TM16%
  4. All 3, TKL,NKS,TM5%
  5. Spoilt Vote17%
  6. Not eligible to vote15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2021 to 14 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 885,059 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Singapore Largest Telegram Network Groups/Community” (@SGTGN), 8,065 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SGTGN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.