Boleh pada emosi tapi jangan salah sasaran
💘6

Channel
@SEPILSVT17BASE
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
186subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003982645118 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SEPILSVT17BASE |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 22 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SEPILSVT17BASE |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 186 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 187 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
227 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 114 | 50.2% | |
| ❤ | 48 | 21.1% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 7.93% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 5.29% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 3.96% | |
| 😴 | 7 | 3.08% | |
| 💩 | 6 | 2.64% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 2.64% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 1.76% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.881% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.441% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 227reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 23 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Boleh pada emosi tapi jangan salah sasaran
💘6
Tolong di baca yak, jangan bawa orang yang ga tau permasalahan mereka apa, fokus ke buma sama shaka aja, orang terdekat mereka juga ga tau mereka kemana
👍55💩5❤3
https://t.me/SEPILSVT17BASE/309 kak tolong ya infoin jangan pada salah sasaran ke radjaa cukup chat ke shaka dan buma aja jangan ke kerabat teman atau sekitarnyaa yaa minta tolong ya kak..makasii
❤1
Hi min, aku salah satu mantan adm svb alias ismera, minta tolong buat di ingetin ya biar ngga pada latah ke akun nya radja alias pacarnya si shaka itu, krn chat nya udah spam dan keterlaluan juga.. bang radja nya jg udah bantuin kita hubungin si shaka cm ga bisa 🙏🏻
Hallo, admin. Boleh minta tolong nggak ya? Tolong fw ke channel spill an ya. Disini kami sebagai orang yang kenal sama Buma merasa terganggu karena semenjak itu dapat beberapa anon bahkan ada yang nggak segan nyamperin ke rc buat minta Buma online. Kami nggak tau kemana perginya Buma, dan kami juga lagi nunggu Buma buat klarif. Dengan adanya anonim dan rc dengan menanyakan keberadaan Buma, jujur itu sangat…
Halo kak aku perwakilan dari admin svb ingin menyampaikan beberapa infomasi Halo semua maaf membuat kalian menunggu lama, ada sedikit informasi dari kami. Setelah melihat beberapa hari ini dari pihak Shaka dan Buma sendiri masih belum ada kejelasan dan belum muncul di group chat kami, kami disini juga sudah berusaha untuk reach out mereka satu satu bahkan spam tag namun belum ada tanda mereka muncul di gr…
🔥16😴7❤2
Ini pihak admin ada yang speak up dan kasih info, tapi mereka cantumin akun rp nya karena akun ca mereka ga aktif, mau di fw kesini atau ga usah? React 👍 kalo mau di fw
👍53
Coba yang ada info soal Buma bisa kabarin gue kesini
Buma sampe sekarang belum muncul juga? Padahal semua masalah awal ini dari lo bum
🥰12💘1
https://t.me/klarifikasishan/15 Gimana mau ga ada laporan, mereka jelas kecewa sama tindakan kalian, omongan bilang bakal di berhentiin kalo mereka ngelakuin kesalahan 3x tapi tiba tiba di berhentiin, siapa yang ga kecewa
https://t.me/klarifikasishan/11 Tentang klarifikasi ini, apa ini yang kalian sebut diskusi? Kalian kasih vote dan semua vote mau lanjut, tapi kalian malah berhentiin mereka Sama kayak kalian minta omongin baik baik tapi kalian sendiri malah se enaknya kocak
❤1
Shaka jangan lupa di jabarin apa kesalahan Lo ke A, jangan lupa sama ketikan lo di gc admin yang giring opini jelek jelekin A sampe dia di benci sama admin lain
💯6
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @SEPILSVT17BASE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 230,301 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SEPILSVT17BASE named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SPILL @SVT17BASE” (@SEPILSVT17BASE), 186 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SEPILSVT17BASE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.