历城莉利娅165 100 B 颜值高身材好莞式,独long 无🍑 S m 蛇纹6.9潮pen 无所不能,好评无数 10张 夜40
👍1

Channel
@SDGBT
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
13,120subscribers
-491 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001138615099 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SDGBT |
| Description | 置顶有山东其他各地区群链接 有问题私信狗蛋 https://t.me/GDAPZY 山东各地区广播台 @SDGBT |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SDGBT |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 02:45 | 13,120 | -15 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:45 | 13,135 | -14 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 04:51 | 13,149 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:00 | 13,151 | -3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:40 | 13,154 | -13 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:41 | 13,167 | -7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:01 | 13,174 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:15 | 13,178 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:29 | 13,185 | -4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:51 | 13,189 | -13 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:27 | 13,202 | -9 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:17 | 13,211 | +1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:27 | 13,210 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 13,216 | -10 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:05 | 13,226 | +3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:07 | 13,223 | -18 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:40 | 13,241 | -13 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:41 | 13,254 | -1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:41 | 13,255 | -2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:18 | 13,257 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (30 July 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 13,402 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 18:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
历城莉利娅165 100 B 颜值高身材好莞式,独long 无🍑 S m 蛇纹6.9潮pen 无所不能,好评无数 10张 夜40
👍1
唐冶月月24 172 64 D 服务性选手,能御能sao 主动热情 8张叶24可外卖
唐冶妍妍25 162 90 D 南方妹妹温柔细腻 极品身材 服务热情 10张 叶30可外卖
唐冶小优03 163 102 D 本人实拍,服务配合度高 8张叶24全套服务
历城兜兜168 95 C 性格温顺 蛇纹 6.9 独long 莞式服务精通 8张 叶24
历城嘉宝165 105 C 妖娆妩媚 服务热情 身材火辣 8张 叶24
历城崽崽06年165 100 B 清纯少女,会的不多,听话配合可无🍑 12张叶40
不要相信任何群里骗子 需要安排联系狗蛋回复 @GDAPZY
唐冶星星23 165 90 C 短期兼职 甜美可爱 10张叶30
唐冶果果00后165 110 D 平面模特兼职 皮肤白嫩光滑 8张 叶24
唐冶妍妍25 162 90 D 极品身材,真实大🐻 南方妹妹 10张叶30
不要相信任何群里骗子 需要安排联系狗蛋回复 @GDAPZY
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @SDGBT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“山东CJ修车广播台” (@SDGBT), 13,120 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SDGBT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.