Channel
@SCMUsers
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003796760976 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SCMUsers |
| Description | Trusted COM & Crypto intelligence: news, updates, scam warnings. 💌 Inquiries & ads: @q4hao 💬 Discussion: @scmuserschat |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 8 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SCMUsers |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 3 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 8 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
⚠️JUST IN: ZachXBT has received a $150K USDT bounty from BC Game for identifying an exploiter. ZachXBT submitted a detailed report along with an on-chain graph tracing the attacker’s wallet responsible for stealing ~$4.3M through a third-party game exploit. @SCMusers / @Discussion
Want To Gamble With No KYC Or ID? We Offer Tons Of Games Such As BlackJack, Mines And Dice. Join @Dices and enter the weekly giveaways! ( PAID AD )
The official crypto exchange Binance just embarrassed itself. They tried to publish an article about alleged fraudster John Lick (@evil), but instead of writing $40,000,000, they accidentally wrote $40. 😭 @SCMusers / @discussion
⚠️Reports surface that @dead and @evil (john lick), can be the same person. As since John bought @star and @evil off of @dead for $8mil, and now since John's arrest @dead is also been inactive, making this theory even more believable. All of this is just speculation at this point in time. @SCMusers / @discussion
⚠️JUST IN: Fragment has just sold its most expensive anonymous number The number +888 8 777 was just sold for 651,358 TON (~$882K), making it the most expensive anonymous number ever listed on Fragment. @SCMusers / @discussion
⚠️ JUST IN: Ledger is facing criticism after claiming it had not been hacked in 10 years. ZachXBT says Ledger has been compromised multiple times in recent years, with the latest incident on January 5, 2026 contributing to social engineering scams where users lost millions. @SCMusers / @discussion
⚠️ JUST IN: Notorious crypto scammer Pink Drainer has moved funds after 7 months of inactivity. Pink Drainer, whose phishing tools have been linked to over $85M in stolen crypto, just moved $117K from known wallets earlier today. @SCMusers / @discussion
⚠️JUST IN: Threat actors have begun phishing Signal users while impersonating Signal support. Signal says this phishing bot has taken over government official and other high-profile accounts after attackers social engineered victims into sharing their SMS verification codes. @SCMusers / @discussion
⚠️JUST IN: Real Madrid players’ X accounts appear to have been compromised. A threat actor most likely paid an insider at X (Twitter) to gain access to the accounts and promote a memecoin across the compromised profiles. Do not buy or interact with the token being promoted as it will likely end in a rug pull. @SCMusers / Discussion
⚠️ JUST IN: Chinese investor @fugui just dropped over $650K on two premium Telegram anonymous numbers. The investor paid 305,000 TON ($392,535) for +888 8 808 and 195,000 TON ($259,692) for +888 8 159, bringing the total to approximately $652,227. @SCMusers / Discussion
⚠️JUST IN: Solv.finance Exploited for $2.7M Solv.finance was exploited for $2.7 million through a double-minting vulnerability in its BitcoinReserveOffering (BRO) contract. The flaw allowed attackers to mint BRO tokens twice per transaction by triggering both the callback function and the mint function simultaneously. The attacker looped the exploit 22 times, inflating 135 BRO tokens into 567 million BRO, then exch…
⚠️JUST IN: On-chain investigator ZachXBT mocks Ledger after its recent security claims. A previous incident exposed Ledger customer data through payment processor Global-e, leaking personal details like names and contact information. ZachXBT later mocked Ledger’s security claims, pointing out the incident. @SCMusers / Discussion
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @SCMUsers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SCMUsers named 25 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SCM Users ⚠️” (@SCMUsers), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SCMUsers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.