Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SCARACF ⋮ 𝟦 daily

@SCARA_DAILY

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

511subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003178307789
TypeChannel
Username@SCARA_DAILY
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SCARA_DAILY

Growth

510511510.513 Aug 2026, 15:47 — 510 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 01:13 — 511 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 15:4714 Aug 2026, 01:13
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 510–511 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:13511+1
13 Aug 2026, 15:47510first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 10 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.0%
avg views ÷ 511 subscribers
Avg views / post
123
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
30.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held18 (10 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total2,212
Reactions total639
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

639 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 538876367521975741912018.8%
custom 54518941153084201388913.9%
7611.9%
custom 53460340119594732037311.4%
❤‍🔥6610.3%
custom 5323316740225005995629.70%
custom 5213413431973028506457.04%
custom 5406690658259865572365.63%
custom 5323322830488630618264.07%
custom 5406714649947181375233.60%
custom 5323350975409323871111.72%
🍓111.72%
💘10.156%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 639reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SCARA_DAILY. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC35 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

SCARACF.T.ME😀😀😀 💗 😀😀 #art 🥹 #only 🎀 😀😀 credit ₎ _kaexii . .

custom 532331674022500599552custom 54067146499471813751custom 54518941153084201381

13 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC73 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026

спасибо за звезды кстати!🌟🌟

custom 540671464994718137510custom 54518941153084201382❤‍🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC74 views36 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

SCARACF.T.ME 😀😀😀 💗 😀😀 #art 🥹 #only 🎀 😀😀 credit ₎ ringoame0001 . .

custom 534603401195947320320custom 52134134319730285066custom 53233167402250059956custom 545189411530842013821❤‍🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC106 views32 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

SCARACF.T.ME😀😀😀 💗 😀😀 #cosplay 🥹 #only 🎀 😀😀 credit ₎ nir92v . .

custom 5346034011959473203178❤‍🔥5custom 53233167402250059951custom 54518941153084201381

13 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC97 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

❌❌ꞋꞌꞋ𝓥𝒐𝒅𝒚𝒆𝒕𝒕𝒆 𝒅𝒂𝒊𝒍𝒚. 🤩🤩понравился дуэт оперной певицы Водяницы и балерины Одетте🌟?🎀 🥹𝓉𝒽ℯ𝓃 🤩 𝒔𝒖𝒃𝒔𝒄𝒓𝒊𝒃𝒆❗️

13 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC110 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @mp_frchikPhoto

🧪Я ангел или демон — решать тебе, ведь я светлее тени и темнее божества.Под тиканье часов мы будем кружить в танце снова и снова... ❌Нуждаешься в ежедневном контенте с розоволосой охотницей каверн?🤩 🤩🤩ПОДПИСЫВАЙСЯ СКОРЕЕ НА ДЕЙЛИ ПО РАМИЭЛЬ˖

1

13 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC101 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @hi3rdkinniePhoto

🥹🥹🤩🤩🥹да, я кинню Велиону, и я часто ревную, но не говорю об этом открыто 🥹@hi3rdkinnie

custom 538876367521975741921

12 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC133 views39 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

SCARACF.T.ME😀😀😀 💗 😀😀 #art 🥹 #other 🎀 😀😀 credit ₎ Diing_KU . .

custom 545189411530842013821custom 538876367521975741911❤‍🔥51custom 53233167402250059951

12 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC131 views45 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

SCARACF.T.ME😀😀😀 💗 😀😀 #art 🥹 #only 🎀 😀😀 credit ₎ mikern0707 . .

custom 538876367521975741924custom 53233167402250059956custom 54066906582598655724custom 52134134319730285062custom 53233228304886306182custom 534603401195947320321❤‍🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC136 views45 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

SCARACF.T.ME😀😀😀 💗 😀😀 #art 🥹 #only 🎀 😀😀 credit ₎ vilakkushin . .

custom 538876367521975741926custom 53233167402250059957❤‍🔥61💘1custom 52134134319730285061custom 53233509754093238711custom 54067146499471813751

11 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC147 views48 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

SCARACF.T.ME😀😀😀 💗 😀😀 #art 🥹 #only 🎀 😀😀 credit ₎ takura_0103 . .

25❤‍🔥7custom 54518941153084201385custom 52134134319730285063custom 53233167402250059952custom 53233509754093238712custom 54066906582598655722custom 54067146499471813752

11 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC158 views50 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

SCARACF.T.ME😀😀😀 💗 😀😀 #art 🥹 #other 🎀 😀😀 credit ₎ touka0103 . .

custom 532332283048863061822custom 538876367521975741910custom 53233167402250059958custom 53460340119594732033❤‍🔥21custom 52134134319730285061custom 53233509754093238711

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @SCARA_DAILY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 299,555 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SCARACF ⋮ 𝟦 daily” (@SCARA_DAILY), 511 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SCARA_DAILY.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.