Channel
@SBSCRMKKKKKK
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
24subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002039051542 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SBSCRMKKKKKK |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 24 March 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SBSCRMKKKKKK |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 24 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 25 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 25 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
73 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5260678486208559757 | 19 | 26.0% | |
| custom 5156829295137522301 | 18 | 24.7% | |
| custom 5231197796329072703 | 14 | 19.2% | |
| custom 5222468670436943157 | 8 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5231376462673619549 | 5 | 6.85% | |
| custom 5298654595629722096 | 5 | 6.85% | |
| custom 5231030374208907112 | 4 | 5.48% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2024 to 30 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
@Mayowwq
Signed златовская
У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Mayowwq Она обзывала моих друзей и говорила,что она богиня,а они все боты слитые. Звонки и сообщения со самом ей.Заблокировала меня и просит чтобы ей много людей писало ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
custom 52311977963290727036custom 51568292951375223014custom 52606784862085597574custom 52224686704369431573
Signed златовская
79825938618 https://vk.com/id638072507
Signed златовская
tg://openmessage?user_id=1750751630 андроид tg://user?id=1750751630 айфон
custom 51568292951375223013custom 52224686704369431573custom 52606784862085597571
Signed граждансктй
АВЫЛЩЗЛАСЫВЛЩЗАФЛЩЗВЫЛЗЩАЛЩЗВЫЛЩАЛЩЗВЫЛЩЗАЛЩЗВЫЛЩЗАЛЩЗВЫЛЩЗАЛВЩЫЗЛАЩЗ
custom 52606784862085597572custom 51568292951375223011custom 52311977963290727031
Signed граждансктй
в кф какой то пиздит всем что гражданский он, как я зашла начал хуйню пиздеть по типу ой моя зашла
Signed златовская
У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! https://t.me/SBSCRMKKKKKK/120 КАКОЙ НАХУЙ КОДЕКС ЧЕСТИ ХАКЕРА, ВЫ ЕГО ГДЕ ОТКОПАЛИ? ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
custom 52606784862085597572custom 51568292951375223011custom 52311977963290727031
Signed златовская
щас вечная ссылка будет, подождите
custom 51568292951375223011custom 52313764626736195491custom 52606784862085597571custom 52986545956297220961
Signed златовская
ребят, @Karinasosalaumenya наспамьте чучелу, втирает всем что он гражданский
custom 52606784862085597572custom 51568292951375223011custom 52311977963290727031
Signed златовская
У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! https://t.me/+6rUz3Zmr4tU4Nzc6 спам заявками🙏🙏 влд похуй на участников, и еще удивляется что уходят люди ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
Signed златовская
@Tynech_Cat обиженка сливает каналы в рейд конфу,за то что ее замутили или дали варн а потом говорит что администрация ужасная и не следит за чатом и выдают муты и Варны без причины #тейк
custom 51568292951375223013custom 52606784862085597573custom 52986545956297220962custom 52224686704369431571custom 52313764626736195491
Signed гражданский
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SBSCRMKKKKKK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SBSCRMKKKKKK named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“38'MK RAID confession” (@SBSCRMKKKKKK), 24 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SBSCRMKKKKKK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.