Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for На яхте с SAM sailing ⛵️

Channel

На яхте с SAM sailing ⛵️

@SAMsailing

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

939subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002079167707
TypeChannel
Username@SAMsailing
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SAMsailing

Growth

9339399367 August 2026 — 933 subscribers8 August 2026 — 933 subscribers15 August 2026 — 939 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 932–940 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:44939+6
8 Aug 2026, 00:51933no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:04933first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.3%
avg views ÷ 939 subscribers
Avg views / post
134
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 4 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held4 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total536
Reactions total40
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 39s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2972.5%
🐳37.50%
😍37.50%
25.00%
🔥25.00%
👀12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC108 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

6 августа, четверг Очень понравилось на Зубах, но надо сваливать до наплыва гулет с дей турами и толпами туристов Решили далеко не ходить, а перейти до соседней бухты Бенчик, у команды желания побольше плавать в море и отдыхать в красивом месте без суеты и лишних телодвижений Бухта Бенчик очень зеленая, вокруг сплошные сосны из-за этого в воздухе стоит густой запах хвои, в маловетренные дни полное ощущение что ты

👍7🐳1👀1

6 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC150 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Часть 4 Заключительная Остров на нас всех произвел приятное впечатление, нугулялись, насмотрелись, повоссторгались 😍 Плюсы этого места - просто восхитительно 👍 Минусы - очень много туристических гулет (дей тур), нужно ждать вечера когда все свалят, не совсем спокойная стоянка, ночью слегка свелит, но терпимо, приходить сюда луче по штилю, всё таки это остров, а не закрытая бухта, иногда может не быть свободного м

👍9🐳2😍1

6 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC146 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Часть 3 Как появился остров Хотя многие называют его вулканическим, правильнее говорить, что это необычные скальные образования, сформированные миллионами лет эрозии под воздействием ветра, волн и дождя. Именно поэтому поверхность острова выглядит словно вырезанной вручную — с множеством волн, арок и острых гребней. Интересный факт Местные жители иногда называют Dişlice «островом влюблённых». Среди его скал есть

👍62😍1

6 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC132 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Часть 2 Остров Зубов (тур. Dişlice Adası) или как мы его называем Драконьи зубы или Зубы дракона, одно из самых необычных мест в заливе Хисарёню, между Орхание и Селимие на полуострове Бозбурун. Благодаря своим причудливым скалам он считается одной из самых фотогеничных природных достопримечательностей этого района. Почему его называют «островом Зубов» Название Dişlice происходит от турецкого слова diş — «зуб». Ес

👍7🔥2😍1

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @SAMsailing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 329,971 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“На яхте с SAM sailing ⛵️” (@SAMsailing), 939 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SAMsailing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.