Channel
@SALARVALUATION
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,222subscribers
+115 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001813101176 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SALARVALUATION |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SALARVALUATION |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 3,222 | +14 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 3,208 | -9 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:40 | 3,217 | +8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 3,209 | +4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 3,205 | +18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 3,187 | +23 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 3,164 | +19 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 3,145 | +39 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 3,106 | +6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 3,100 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 3,105 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 3,107 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
74 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 61 | 82.4% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 6.76% | |
| 😎 | 4 | 5.41% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 2.70% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.35% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 1.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اشتباه بزرگتر از اشتباه قبلی اینجاست: تحلیلگر=رمال یا تریدر= قمارباز پلی مارکت قسمتی از این جریانه که ارزش پیشگوها رو بالاتر از تحلیلگران نشون میده دنیای تحلیل محاسبات منطقی برای بازارهاست دنیای واقعی نه کاملا پیشگو محور. و نه کاملا منطق محوره و این وسط احساسات خریدارها و فروشنده ها دخیل هستن
❤7
Signed Salar
اشتباه بزرگی که بورس بازها دارن مقایسه پرتفو با شاخص کله شاخص بعد از اسنپ بک ۱۳۰% رشد کرده ولی شاید سبد یک عده افزایش معادل ندیده علت ها; ۱- سهم بنیادی را زود فروختند ۲- سهم زیان ده یا کم پتانسیل خریدند ۳- نقطه ورود بالا داشتند و میانگین کم نکردند ۴- به بتادو توجه نکردند @salarvaluation
👍2❤1👏1
Signed Salar
توقف طرح بنزین ۸۷ هزار تومانی پخش فراورده های نفتی کرمان: پیرو مذاکرات امشب استاندار کرمان با مقامات کشوری و نیاز به بررسی بیشتر طرح مدیریت مصرف سوخت و مقابله با قاچاق، عرضۀ بنزین با نرخ آزاد پالایشگاهی در استان کرمان متوقف شد. تا اطلاع ثانوی، فرآیند عرضۀ بنزین در جایگاه‌های سوخت استان مطابق روال پیشین ادامه خواهد داشت. انتخاب
😎4
Signed Salar
در گزرش های ۶ماهه اسپرد دلاری نفت کوره و گازوییل خیلی شدیدتر خواهد بود که هیچ ربطی به قیمت های داخلی نداره . بماند که اوره و آمونیاک و بوتان وتولوئن و پنتان یعنی بخشی از فرآوده های پتروشیمی با ۱۲۳ هزار ثبت شدند
❤3
Signed Salar
این کار بسیا تورم زاست شدیدا به نفع اسپرد ریالی پالایشی هاست ولی کاملا علیه بقیه گروههاست ردیف هزینه اداری و ردیف سایر هزینه های عملیاتی بقیه صنایع حداقل ۳۰ ۴۰% بیشتر میشن اما از اونجا که سود ناخالص خیلی از شرکتها بالاست اثر منفی زیادی به سودعملیاتی و خالص نداره فقط تارگت ها رو یک یا دو پله پایین میاره
👍3❤2
Signed Salar
اگه حداقل مقداری تحلیل بنیادی بلد باشید میبینید قیمت تمام شده بنزین ۶۰ هزاره نه ۸۷ هزار اما اگه واقعا اکتان بالا به کار بره باز قیمت ۸۷ نمیشه. مگر اینکه لیتری ۱۵/۵ سنتی رو با دلار ۵۶۱ هزاری حساب کنن
❤5👀1😘1
Signed Salar
تا اینجا پازل بنیادی نرخ بهره دو تکه خیلی مهم داره: ۱- سردی بازارکار ۲- حفظ نرخ تورم مصرف کننده لینک بونوس های معاملاتی
❤3
Signed Salar
دسامبر امسال مس بورس لندن با قیمت زیر ۱۴۰۰۰دلار در تن تحویل داده می شود. ضعف سطح تقاضا در چین یک تنه جلوی قیمت همه مصارف صنعتی را می گیرد
❤6
Signed Salar
✅گزارش وال‌استریت ژورنال؛ ترامپ در پی اعلام یک‌جانبه پیروزی و پایان جنگ در صورت بازگشایی تنگه هرمز روزنامه «وال‌استریت ژورنال» گزارش داد: دونالد ترامپ در حال آماده‌سازی برای اعلام یک‌جانبه‌ی پیروزی و پایان جنگ با ایران است، به این شرط که تهران اقدام به بازگشایی تنگه هرمز کند. رئیس‌جمهور آمریکا دیگر توافق هسته‌ای جدید را به عنوان یک ضرورت تلقی نمی‌کند.
Signed Salar
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤6
Signed Salar
سال ۱۴۰۱ برای نهاد رسمی ارزش گذاری تحلیل جامع و برآورد ۵ساله شده بود/
❤5
Signed Salar
اکسل تحلیل بنیادی دو سال پیش، تحلیل حق صادره سرمایه گذاری و مدلسازی بسیار منطقی و دقیق با همه منفی های سال ۱۴۰۳ به ثمر نشست... تحلیل بنیادی باید اصولی پیش بره
❤4
Signed Salar
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SALARVALUATION. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SALAR | VALUATION” (@SALARVALUATION), 3,222 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SALARVALUATION.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.