4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,670–1,676 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 03:58
1,671
-3
10 Aug 2026, 13:16
1,674
-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:31
1,675
no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:18
1,675
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 1 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
326 reactions across 5 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👏
79
24.2%
🔥
64
19.6%
🤣
58
17.8%
❤
32
9.82%
💩
23
7.06%
❤🔥
13
3.99%
😁
12
3.68%
🌭
11
3.37%
🖕
8
2.45%
🍌
6
1.84%
🏆
6
1.84%
🍓
4
1.23%
💯
3
0.92%
🙏
2
0.613%
🤯
2
0.613%
🌚
1
0.307%
👌
1
0.307%
🥴
1
0.307%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2023 to 11 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@RorronoaDefy Zorro Calls "Big Whales" Pepe the owner of https://t.me/Zorrogems is another example of noname beggars callers DMing devs begging them to hire him, never posting the call and immediately blocking the dev on all socials.
Screenshots attached. Kind of self-explanotary. The devs paid Zorro for a call, he asked for the payment before the call, and as soon as he received it, blocked them on tg, deleted th…
Xbets is launching in a few hours. Another incubation attempt from scammer Bossy, now partnering with serial farmer @ETH_CAPONEE the owner of https://t.me/WolvesOfAltStreet . ETH CAPONE farmed 5 tokens in less than 2 months.
https://www.pinksale.finance/launchpad/0xb40DAbfE21fd5171861C1Cb19Ad0522984492ea8?chain=ETH NIBBLER was his first token and the most successful one. He had a big first mover advantage to start …
Another amazing launch from scammer bossy. "Incubated by Bossy" and down 95% in a single day, right after launch, from ath 1mil to $50k. Anything Bossy touches dumps to 0. I am not sure who bought this scam and why but thanks for letting him steal more.
You can read more about this dirty jeet in my posts here
https://t.me/SAFUREPORT/994
https://t.me/SAFUREPORT/996
https://t.me/SAFUREPORT/1049
https://t.me/SAFUREPORT…
[2/2]
The second issue is that this scam was incubated by brothers marketing. Usually, when anon team rugs, they can just disappear and there is nobody to hold responsible. Now holders can hold their incubator, marketer, and partner responsible for this scam. It's funny how so many people were bullish on it just because bsc brothers marketers were helping another bsc farm team. Literally join the tg and see how many…
👏22🔥8🍌2🙏2
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @SAFUREPORT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 240,185 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@SAFUREPORT named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@eth_caponee named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@rorronoadefy named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@stealthred named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SAFU&REPORT” (@SAFUREPORT), 1,671 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SAFUREPORT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
