Channel
@S3D_2014
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,834subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001446336753 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @S3D_2014 |
| Created | 23 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/S3D_2014 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 1,834 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 1,844 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 1,846 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 1,846 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 August 2025 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 985 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
213 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 69 | 32.4% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 23.5% | |
| 😡 | 34 | 16.0% | |
| 🤔 | 28 | 13.1% | |
| 🫡 | 16 | 7.51% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 5.16% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 1.41% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.939% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 213reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
„Niezależnie od swoich zalet czy wad, ci rzekomi zbawcy – czy zbawczynie – osiągnąć mogą bardzo niewiele, ponieważ zderzają się z zaskakującym odkryciem schyłkowego populizmu: z władzą jako taką, z tym, co nazywają „głębokim państwem”. Albo się je przejmie, albo nic z tego nie wyniknie. To aparat państwowy wykonuje decyzje albo odmawia ich wykonania. I to on ostatecznie zwycięża nad tymi, którzy jedynie wydają polec…
❤6🔥1
Stowarzyszenie III Droga pinned «Archiwum naszego portalu: https://t.me/IIIdroga Od tej pory to pod tym linkiem będziemy publikować nasze nowe materiały.»
Archiwum naszego portalu: https://t.me/IIIdroga Od tej pory to pod tym linkiem będziemy publikować nasze nowe materiały.
❤5
Channel photo updated
#Poland #History 🇵🇱🏴 The Landsknechts have honoured the memory of Poland’s anti-communist resistance! Nationalists from Trzecia Droga, long-time members of the Les Lansquenets project, have commemorated the Doomed Soldiers Remembrance Day, dedicated to the struggle of Polish patriots against the Soviet Union in the years 1944–1963. Grave candles were lit at sites dedicated to these soldiers in many regions of the co…
🫡10❤5❤🔥2👍1
„Mniej zatłoczona Terra byłaby w najlepszym interesie wszystkich, prawda? Właściwie to nie. Nie byłaby. Tak naprawdę, to byłaby bardzo zła dla nas wszystkich. Ten esej składa się z trzech części. W części pierwszej omówiono powody, dla których załamanie demograficzne stanowi zagrożenie egzystencjalne dla cywilizacji; są wśród nich niektóre nieprzyjemne konsekwencje, z którymi już mamy do czynienia, takie jak migrac…
🤔8👍2
#NewYear #LansquenetFoundation #Propaganda 📣 🏴 As 2026 dawns, the #Lansquenets Project is planning to intensify its presence. Since 2014, we've built a guild-like school, uniting Europeans inspired by a vertical, profound Idea of the World that transcends materialism and opportunism. In the new year, we want to amplify our recognition across social media through dedicated propaganda streams: raw, principled broadca…
🔥6🤔3💔1
#PREMIERA „Jednym z powodów, dla których niektórzy wyrażają czarnopigułkowe opinie, jest nasze silne pragnienie, by nie być postrzeganym jako osoba naiwna. Ponieważ wywrotowcy, którzy przejęli stery naszej kultury, są cyniczni i nihilistyczni, naturalnie przez dziesięciolecia przedstawiali te cechy w pozytywnym świetle, łagodząc w ten sposób nasze postrzeganie tych cech. Dziś jest postrzegane jako całkiem fajne i mo…
👍13
#PREMIERA „Otwarcie „puszki Pandory”: technik PR-u, polittechnologii, marketingu i psychoanalizy, doprowadziło do szybkiego rozwoju kapitalizmu i transformacji demokracji jako takiej. Co więcej, inżynieria społeczna i PR same w sobie mają charakter nie tyle demokratyczny, co merytokratyczny, ponieważ tego rodzaju specjaliści istnieją jako wymóg systemu kapitalistycznego dla bezwarunkowego zwycięstwa akceptowalnych k…
🤔8
#LansquenetsCorrespondents #Poland #Romania #Hungary #France #Military 🌐 Under the EU’s new Security Action for Europe (SAFE) programme, the European Commission has loaned billions of euros to EU members to improve their military capabilities. The biggest beneficiary of the fund is undeniably going to be Poland 🇵🇱, as it has been loaned €43.7 billion. The other main beneficiaries are Romania 🇷🇴, Hungary 🇭🇺 and Fra…
👍6
#LesLansquenets #DaysOfEurope #RearmEurope 🟥⬛️ ⚔️ DAYS OF EUROPE | Lansquenets ⚔️ Day 4: #ContemporaryThreats Russia 🇷🇺 and USA 🇺🇸 are today's Turks 🇷🇺Russia: 2008 Georgia • 2014 Crimea, Donbas • 2022 Full invasion of Ukraine • 2025 Provocations against Eastern Europe and the African endeavours pose a threat to the security of the whole continent. 🇺🇸USA: 2001 Afghanistan • 2003 Iraq • 2011 Libya • 2014 Syria • 2…
❤9
„Ponieważ materia kosmiczna jest zawsze w ciągłym ruchu, sama w sobie nie może mieć solidności i stabilności. Najlepsze, co może zrobić, to nasycić się formą odciśniętą na niej przez inteligentny projekt, ale ponieważ Materia jest kobieca, a kobiecość jest destrukcyjna, obejmuje ona również to, co pojawia się wraz z upływem czasu: entropię. Nawet forma odciśnięta na Materii w końcu ustąpi”. https://3droga.pl/kultura…
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @S3D_2014. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 227,556 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stowarzyszenie III Droga” (@S3D_2014), 1,834 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/S3D_2014.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.