Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рыбалка по-Русски

Channel

Рыбалка по-Русски

@Rybalka_po_Russki

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,565subscribers

-545 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002124532888
TypeChannel
Username@Rybalka_po_Russki
Description«Живем рыбалкой» Владелец: @avoropay30 Администратор: @aleksss23 Биржа: https://telega.in/channels/+wz5aP29uV7AxODhi/card РКН # 5304595127 https://clck.ru/3NFwys
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rybalka_po_Russki

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,56512,11011,837.57 August 2026 — 12,110 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,110 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,104 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,099 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,095 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,090 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,082 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,073 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,068 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,058 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,053 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,049 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,046 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,040 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,033 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,026 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,022 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,012 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,994 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,989 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,985 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,979 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,966 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,964 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,942 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,929 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,915 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,869 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,856 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,835 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,818 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,806 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,805 subscribers25 September 2026 — 11,783 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,747 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,725 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,707 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,695 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,691 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,684 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,674 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,665 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,662 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,659 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,650 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,644 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,639 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,633 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,631 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,628 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,621 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,618 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,612 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,604 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,600 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,594 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,593 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,580 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,573 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,565 subscribers7 August 20267 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -545. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,483–12,192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 18:0011,565-8
6 Nov 2026, 19:5011,573-7
5 Nov 2026, 16:2911,580-13
4 Nov 2026, 15:0711,593-1
3 Nov 2026, 15:2611,594-6
2 Nov 2026, 11:5011,600-4
1 Nov 2026, 09:5611,604-8
30 Oct 2026, 12:4411,612-6
29 Oct 2026, 11:2911,618-3
28 Oct 2026, 07:1811,621-7
27 Oct 2026, 06:0811,628-3
26 Oct 2026, 04:3811,631-2
25 Oct 2026, 03:4111,633-6
24 Oct 2026, 00:5011,639-5
23 Oct 2026, 02:5611,644-6
22 Oct 2026, 03:4811,650-9
20 Oct 2026, 19:5811,659-3
19 Oct 2026, 20:3511,662-3
18 Oct 2026, 20:1711,665-9
17 Oct 2026, 18:5711,674first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,470
Videos
≈2,770
Links
≈3,790

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 17s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

507 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍24047.3%
🤣14027.6%
❤7414.6%
🔥479.27%
👏20.394%
🙏20.394%
😢10.197%
😭10.197%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 507 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 17 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
7,780
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
6,240
over 19 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHwPXgc117 March 202617 March 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 17 March 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

17 Mar 2026, 17:44 UTC≈13,700 views39 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Вот так папы приучают дочек к рыбалке 😉 🎣 Рыбалка по-Русски | Чат рыбаков

👍29❤9🔥1

17 Mar 2026, 14:30 UTC≈9,750 views25 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Наверно очень приятно таких сазанчиков ловить 🧐 🎣 Рыбалка по-Русски | Чат рыбаков

👍17❤8

17 Mar 2026, 13:29 UTC≈7,780 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFHwPXgcForwarded from @uu_kosraPhoto

‼️Розыгрыш‼️ 🔥Три приза, три победителя Первое место OSPREY Палатка 3-местная Второе место Нож тактический Третье место Набор для зимней рыбалки 10 в 1 Условия👇 Быть подписчиком сообществ ✅Походы Выживание Бушкрафт ✅Выживание ✅Барахолка снаряжение для туризма охоты рыбалки ✅Нажать на кнопку участвую. Розыгрыш пройдет автоматически как только наберется 1200 ⚡️Удачи Информация о рекламодателе и токен ERID: Рекла…

❤5🤣1

17 Mar 2026, 10:56 UTC≈4,010 views22 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Рыбацкий юмор 😅 🎣 Рыбалка по-Русски | Чат рыбаков

🔥14🤣6❤2

5 Mar 2026, 17:33 UTC≈6,750 views48 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Достойный экземпляр поймал рыбак Саня 👍 Эмоции на лице😉 🎣 Рыбалка по-Русски | Чат рыбаков

👍43❤2👏2😭1

5 Mar 2026, 13:54 UTC≈5,150 views33 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Как Вам набор рыбака? 👇 🎣 Рыбалка по-Русски | Чат рыбаков

👍29🤣2❤1🔥1

5 Mar 2026, 10:24 UTC≈8,110 views29 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Красивая проводка, улов подкачал правда 😅 🎣 Рыбалка по-Русски | Чат рыбаков

🤣17👍9❤3

5 Mar 2026, 09:06 UTC≈4,820 views9 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

⏺Ручная работа, что живёт десятилетиями! Друзья, хочу посоветовать вам вещь, которая реально стоит внимания. Мой хороший друг, Александр - начпроизводства в мастерской "Кузнецова", парни делают офигенские ножи вручную на моей памяти уже лет 10. Не просто «чтобы было», а из износостойкой американской стали 440C — та, что держит остроту годами и не боится воды, ударов и времени. И сейчас он устроил очень щедрую штук…

❤4👍4🔥1

2 Mar 2026, 08:49 UTC≈5,120 views28 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Вот это подход 😅 🎣 Рыбалка по-Русски | Чат рыбаков

🤣27🙏1

20 Feb 2026, 17:55 UTC≈7,320 views30 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

"Рыбалка для души" 😬 🎣 Рыбалка по-Русски | Чат рыбаков

🤣22❤8

20 Feb 2026, 13:33 UTC≈7,610 views15 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Рабочий монтаж снасти🎣 🎣 Рыбалка по-Русски | Чат рыбаков

👍11❤4

20 Feb 2026, 09:56 UTC≈9,410 views17 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Что только не сделают рыбаки, когда не клюет 😅 🎣 Рыбалка по-Русски | Чат рыбаков

🤣14❤2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Rybalka_po_Russki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Рыбацкий канал | Рыбалка
@rybalka_kanal_fishing · 106,849
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
FINNTRAIL | Рыболовное сообщество
@finntrail_fishing · 38,555
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 1 September 2026
Рыбанутый | Рыбалка
@fishercl · 21,912
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 September 2026
Рыбалка и Охота 🐠
@mashiny_snasti · 55,004
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 23 August 2026
Рыболовная сводка Спб
@rybalka_spb_lenoblasti · 38,619
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рыбалка по-Русски” (@Rybalka_po_Russki), 11,565 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rybalka_po_Russki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.