Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ruthful Hearts

Channel

Ruthful Hearts

@RuthfulHearts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

1,044subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001970271421
TypeChannel
Username@RuthfulHearts
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RuthfulHearts

Growth

1,0351,0441,039.57 August 2026 — 1,035 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,035 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,037 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,044 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,042 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,043 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,044 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 22 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,034–1,045 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 08:541,044+1
26 Aug 2026, 14:121,043+1
20 Aug 2026, 17:151,042-2
17 Aug 2026, 12:451,044+7
14 Aug 2026, 12:481,037+2
8 Aug 2026, 00:201,035no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:211,035first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 1,044 subscribers
Avg views / post
158
1 post measured
Reaction rate
7.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 January 20263 August 2026)
Views total158
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

282 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19970.6%
🎉4014.2%
🔥227.80%
😭51.77%
🤯51.77%
👏41.42%
🥰41.42%
😍20.709%
😢10.355%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 282reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC158 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Hello Ruthful Hearts, as we continue supporting individuals with medical needs this year, we have been going to lots of hospitals and talking to different patients. For this round of help we have stumbled across a single father trying to take care of his child Robel. Robel was diagnosed with a brain tumor and needed medical checkups and MRI scans, but as this was very expensive he wasn't able to get MRI scans for f

9🔥3

25 Jun 2026, 04:43 UTC846 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Hey Ruthful Hearts, our team has visited the girl to check up on her well-being and to see how her child was recovering. Happy to say that they're both doing better and her child is all back to health now. In another topic, one Ruthful Heart from our community has sent us a large pack of sanitary pads to help the women we support and we have given Ms.Dagmawit some sanitary pads enough to last a few months. We're ve

21🔥1

17 Jun 2026, 10:22 UTC957 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

What was supposed to be a journey toward a second chance at life, instead became a test of survival thousands of miles away from home. When Mr. Assefa Wolde Gergeno’s kidneys began to fail, his wife, Tesfanesh Erdedo Ayano, became his donor, selflessly giving up one of her own kidneys so her husband could live. Together, they traveled from Ethiopia to India for an urgent, life-saving transplant at Max Super Speciali

5

6 Jun 2026, 18:34 UTC≈1,080 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Hello, little update. Ms.Dagmawit had reached out to us telling us her child was sick and needed some support. We have sent her 3,000 ETB and we're staying in touch. Thank you for letting us do this! @RuthfulHearts

17

2 May 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,430 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Here's our next donation story: We first met Dagmawit at Beijing Hospital, where she had just given birth and was searching for help. It had only been a week since she welcomed her new born into the world but the child’s father had already left. With no family to turn to, she was searching for help looking for a place to rent and ways to sustain herself and her child. We interviewed her right in the hospital hopin

20👏3😭3

15 Mar 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,650 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

From initial investigations to interviews, from assessing their needs to following up the donation into completion these donations take weeks. But we love doing it. People deserve so much more and we're always pushing the team even further to go the extra-mile in supporting others. We wouldn't have been able to do this if it wasn't for donations and support you guys have shown us and for that we're very grateful! Th

13🎉4🔥2

15 Mar 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,110 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Tsion's mother is an incredible hardworking mother working on multiple jobs to support her three children. She mainly does cleaning but one other way she supports her family is by selling "largo" (the deteregent) While we were purchasing glasses for little Tsion, she shared this incident with us: One day, when she was on a bus on her way to buy largo, a thief stole her hard earned 5,000 birr from her. She was heartb

11🔥2

15 Mar 2026, 13:35 UTC≈1,140 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

One of the individuals we donated to this month was an adorable, sweet little girl called Tsion. She is 9 years old and lives with her mother around Kilinto. She was having trouble with her eyes when we found her. Her eyes get reddish and she was having trouble reading and writing from what's on the blackboard at school. Her mother had taken her to a hospital and got her checked and the doctors have told her she ne

18🎉2😭2

15 Mar 2026, 13:24 UTC801 viewsread 8 August 2026

Hello, here are some donation stories we've done over the past month...

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RuthfulHearts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ruthful Hearts” (@RuthfulHearts), 1,044 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RuthfulHearts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.