Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒

Channel

Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒

@RosePaid

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,168subscribers

+2,741 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001882930555
TypeChannel
Username@RosePaid
DescriptionPrepare your wallet for a profit every day. PM: @xcryptomanager
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/RosePaid

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@CryptoKlondike/1263928 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC@RosePaid/470 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC0.999.6 hours
@CryptoKlondike/1261421 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC@RosePaid/417 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC0.993.6 hours
@CryptoKlondike/1282226 Oct 2026, 13:12 UTC@RosePaid/702 · this entry27 Oct 2026, 06:47 UTC0.9918 hours
@CryptoKlondike/1257411 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC@RosePaid/368 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC0.987.8 hours
@CryptoKlondike/125605 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC@RosePaid/329 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC0.983.4 hours
@CryptoKlondike/125625 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC@RosePaid/331 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC0.985.6 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@CryptoKlondike20 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.985.6 hours@CryptoKlondike (20–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 16 of the 20 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 128 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 June 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @CryptoKlondike. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with the channel listed below. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

1 more channel is in this same group but not listed individually here.

Growth

4,21213,3748,7937 August 2026 — 8,427 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,427 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,419 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,526 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,239 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,996 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,918 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,794 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,732 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,687 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,639 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,575 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,468 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,333 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,325 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,300 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,294 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,284 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,277 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,274 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,255 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,248 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,046 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,910 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,376 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,290 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,015 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,845 subscribers29 September 2026 — 5,865 subscribers6 October 2026 — 5,053 subscribers13 October 2026 — 4,212 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,070 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,374 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,367 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,365 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,519 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,518 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,882 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,696 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,618 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,475 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,369 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,364 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,358 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,354 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,348 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,302 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,290 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,280 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,268 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,255 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,244 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,239 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,233 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,227 subscribers9 November 2026 — 11,216 subscribers11 November 2026 — 11,208 subscribers14 November 2026 — 11,168 subscribers11,1687 August 202614 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 99 days, net +2,741. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,838–14,748 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 09:4611,168-40
11 Nov 2026, 12:4711,208-8
9 Nov 2026, 20:2611,216-11
8 Nov 2026, 15:1811,227-6
7 Nov 2026, 07:2411,233-6
6 Nov 2026, 06:1711,239-5
5 Nov 2026, 06:4611,244-11
4 Nov 2026, 08:3911,255-13
3 Nov 2026, 05:2511,268-12
2 Nov 2026, 03:1611,280-10
1 Nov 2026, 00:1711,290-12
31 Oct 2026, 02:5611,302-46
30 Oct 2026, 03:2811,348-6
29 Oct 2026, 05:1111,354-4
28 Oct 2026, 06:2011,358-6
27 Oct 2026, 07:1811,364-5
26 Oct 2026, 08:4011,369-106
25 Oct 2026, 06:4011,475-143
24 Oct 2026, 08:5511,618-78
23 Oct 2026, 10:5011,696first reading

Engagement

189 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.1%
avg views ÷ 11,168 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,810
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
37
of 189 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held189 (27 June 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total178,120
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 10:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
629
Videos
4
Links
14

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 37 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 17:50 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 15 November 2026

The US inflation figures to be released on Tuesday measure October. October was the most expensive month for oil this year: Brent averaged $124. Oil fell as low as $95 in November. This month's annual inflation figure will also not be released; the US was unable to collect prices last October due to the government shutdown. We will not see the November oil price drop in this data. That effect will be revealed on D…

9 Nov 2026, 17:17 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🐝 BTC UPDATE The price is approaching the last key support existing: Daily MA200. We have to see bullish momentum (pump) during this working week, otherwise — the bull trend is cooked. 📉 Why did Bitcoin fall from $80,000? Because of the stocks market crashing, AI bubble is popping. The situation on the stock market is much worse than on the crypto one. The key supports are still holding. So do we. @RosePaid

9 Nov 2026, 07:18 UTC≈2,080 viewsread 15 November 2026

#Bitcoin 🚨 $BTC has pulled back toward the $74,000 level. The sideways movement has been disrupted by a sudden decline. The only potential catalyst for this sell-off appears to be the news regarding Rubio, who stated that "refusing to engage with Iran—or allowing Iran to collapse—is unacceptable." U.S. stock markets are also opening in negative territory; however, if they fail to sustain this downward trend, it c…

8 Nov 2026, 16:15 UTC≈2,200 viewsread 15 November 2026

IS A "BLACK MONDAY" COMING TOMORROW? Following the U.S. midterm elections and a series of negative earnings reports, the Nasdaq has experienced sharp declines. Within Wall Street circles, anticipation of a "Black Monday" is at its peak. There is a silver lining, however: if everyone is expecting a "Black Monday" tomorrow, it likely won’t happen. Instead, it could arrive when we least expect it—perhaps as a "Black T…

8 Nov 2026, 15:14 UTC≈2,470 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

💰 $COIN We can only pray it will go back above the $140 support during the coming working week. Otherwise it will be a strong bearish factor for Bitcoin. @RosePaid

7 Nov 2026, 14:42 UTC≈3,150 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

$SOL Saved by the Daily MA200. Waiting for a bounce. @RosePaid

6 Nov 2026, 10:34 UTC≈3,510 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

$BTC My honest expectations for the next month. @RosePaid

6 Nov 2026, 09:18 UTC≈3,800 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Yesterday, Bitcoin rose 3.6%, while crude oil prices fell 8.7%. • An inverse correlation rarely lasts long • From June through October, their price movements were in sync Bitcoin has its own driving forces! @RosePaid

6 Nov 2026, 07:19 UTC≈4,230 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🌉 $XAU Gold pumped and retested the $4170 resistance — part of the plan. Still expecting dump continuation. Acceptance below $3960 confirms bearish bias. @RosePaid

5 Nov 2026, 18:02 UTC≈3,690 viewsread 15 November 2026

❌ $NAS100 dumped -6.6% today The last time such a massive dump happened on 4th April of 2025. On that day, China announced 34% retaliatory tariffs on US Goods — response on Trump's sweeping tariffs announced on April 2.

5 Nov 2026, 16:06 UTC≈3,870 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

❗️$BTC must hold this support ($78,000). If we lose it — the way towards $74,000 will be opened. If you are not holding any position, you can consider opening a small (risky), LONG position here. Do or die situation. @RosePaid

5 Nov 2026, 10:04 UTC≈3,990 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🐝❤️ BTC! Bitcoin pumped, reached the $81,200 point. My LONG position is in profit now. Most likely we will see some ranging in the $79,000 - $81,000 area before going up. As it usually works: we consolidate for 2 weeks, then pump/dump in 1 day. Patiently holding my LONG position. @RosePaid

Showing the 12 most recent of 189 posts we hold for @RosePaid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒” (@RosePaid), 11,168 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RosePaid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.