🧊 – он все равно ничего не делал кроме 1 тейка и 3-5 вп

Channel
𝐑𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐅𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐱 𝐃𝐀𝐈𝐋𝐘
@RonCF_Daily
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
48subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004435991397 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RonCF_Daily |
| Description | 𝟏𝟕.𝟎𝟕.𝟐𝟔 𝐁𝐨𝐭: @Ron_Take_bot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 9 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RonCF_Daily |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 48 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 48 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 28.3%
- avg views ÷ 48 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 13.6
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (9 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 217 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 69
- Videos
- 10
- Links
- 36
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 45s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🧊 – Наш.. Админ кинг оранж уходит из администрации.. Потому что, ему не нравится рон из бухгалтерии, и он больше любит доктора харлоу , и он хотел передать, то что любит, ценит вас и, желает удачи. (Админ сам мне диктовал текст)
✩ 💼 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓 📋 cr: [russellyups on Tiktok] // #арт // @Ron_Take_bot
✩ 💼 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓 📋 cr: [kay.iio17 on tiktok] // #арт // @Ron_Take_bot
✩ 💼 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓 📋 cr: [hansongberry on tiktok] // #арт // @Ron_Take_bot #Рэттью
#ва
🤩🤩🖤НОРМ ИЛИ СТРЁМ ?! 🎀🤩 моя подруга просит познакомить меня с моим парнем-норм или стрём?🤩 🥹🤩хочется узнать мнение людей по поводу определенной ситуации?🥹 🎀ДОБРО ПОЖАЛОВАТЬ!
#ва 2х
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Г0в0рят, н3 п0в3з3т 3сли ч3рный к0т д0р0гу п3р3йд3т. А п0ка — на0б0р0т: Т0льк0 ч3рн0му к0ту и н3 в3з3т 🤩🤩 W3lc0m3 t0 ч3рный к0т кф! 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚 Блииннн мне так не хватает админов в кф🦾 А я наоборот хочу работать в каком-нибудь кф😭 А мне надо и то, и другое⚠️ Если вы столкнулись с этим, то... Приглашаем вас в наш кф! 🔈🔈🔈 💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚
✩ 💼 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓 📋 cr: [mm_261053 on Tiktok] // #видео #анимация // @Ron_Take_bot
#вп
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @RonCF_Daily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 259,297 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@any_skill_adopt_cf · 231 post𝘣𝘦𝘢 / 𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘤𝘧!!
@brawlconfbeaa · 1011 post𝘿𝘼𝙍𝙆 𝘿𝙀𝘾𝙀𝙋𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝘾𝙊𝙉𝙁𝙀𝙎𝙎𝙄𝙊𝙉
@darkDeceptionConfess · 131 postFish collection
@fish_collection · 121 postᑕYᗷEᖇ||ᗯᗩᔕTE
@fludixxq · 461 post𝐅𝐨𝐫𝐬𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐧 𝐇𝐀𝐓𝐄 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧
@forsHATEcf · 1151 postХарухи Судзумия confession
@HaruhiSuzumiya_CF · 1251 postбессоница кф
@insomniacf · 1051 post⋄ 𝑆𝑐𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑠ℎ 𝑐𝑎𝑡 ⋄ 𝑐𝑓 × 𝑑𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑦
@scottishcatcf · 71 post𝑺𝒆𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒕 𝑨𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒅𝒂𝒊𝒍𝒚
@secretagentdailycf · 51 post𝆹𝅥𝆹𝅥 ꯭ֺ ⊹ ִ ׁ sᴇᴄʀᴇᴛᴀʀʏ ᴄʜᴀɴɴᴇʟ 𝇄ִ ۫ꔫ۫ 𝅄𝅄 ִ ゙
@SecretChannel67 · 51 post@ они точно канон ...!! [эннеаграмма]
@theyaredefinitelycanon · 71 postУнивер Кф
@UniverCf · 961 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐑𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐅𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐱 𝐃𝐀𝐈𝐋𝐘” (@RonCF_Daily), 48 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RonCF_Daily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.