Я Рома. Вот этот: https://www.youtube.com/c/RomanShevyakov
Купить рекламу: https://telega.in/c/RomanShevyakov
Менеджер: https://t.me/daria_b23
Зарегистрирован в РКН: https://clck.ru/3FvSGR
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,360–20,423 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 19:43
20,367
-6
14 Aug 2026, 07:15
20,373
-9
13 Aug 2026, 02:35
20,382
-11
11 Aug 2026, 23:32
20,393
-11
10 Aug 2026, 21:31
20,404
-6
9 Aug 2026, 19:58
20,410
-2
8 Aug 2026, 17:38
20,412
-3
7 Aug 2026, 15:42
20,415
-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:45
20,416
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.3%
avg views ÷ 20,367 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,560
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
43 (31 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
239,220
Reactions total
17,263
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,940
Videos
≈62
Links
≈1,540
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
17,263 reactions across 43 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,760
45.0%
🔥
2,425
14.0%
😁
1,843
10.7%
🤣
1,236
7.16%
🤯
458
2.65%
🥰
451
2.61%
🍓
441
2.55%
💘
436
2.53%
🌚
368
2.13%
❤🔥
295
1.71%
🙏
175
1.01%
🍌
174
1.01%
😢
170
0.985%
😭
165
0.956%
🤝
125
0.724%
👍
101
0.585%
💯
100
0.579%
👌
83
0.481%
🐳
82
0.475%
🤩
75
0.434%
23 further kinds
300
1.74%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,263reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 43 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RomanShevyakov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.33%
1 of 43 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
5,920
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
5,800
over 42 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqwXhiKk
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Надеюсь, что хотя бы ткани не окажутся какой-нибудь ИИ, потому что там речь уже не о десятках тысяч.
Берем самое лучшее качество, везем из Турции. Собственно, только закуп тканей как половина бушной машины. Остальное производство еще в половину тачки.
Я вкладываю туда вообще все свои деньги, так еще и триста тысяч с небольшим у Даши беру. Как понимаете, комплект будет стоить денег, но его однозначно можно будет пла…
А помните, как я на прошлую субботу делал аж часовое видео про студенческие сообщества, но из-за такого дикого объема перенес релиз на утро воскресенья?
Эм.. Это повторилось только что.
Завтра утром видео про Фоксберри.
Я снимал с самого утра и только закончил. Голодный беру Афину (не съесть, просто поболтать, все же не виделись весь день) и иду сполоснуть ей тоже вилочку за компанию.
Открываю кран.. нет воды. Как так?
Ведь мы закрыли все вопросы кроме отопления (котел не могу завести из-за низкого давления, но это проблемы будущего Ромы), с домом больше нет никакой борьбы.
Проверяю кессон и все содержимое. Реле давления сухое, б…
Пока ездим по делам (по делам квартиры, но об этом позже), в дороге готовлю посты дизайнеров для публикации.
Думаю, чуть позже Рома начнет всё публиковать, но не могу не поделиться своими любимыми работами уже сейчас🔥
1. Мерч с Минтом это мерч с Минтом, а я теперь хочу себе худи с Ромой в лабораторном халате😍
2. И с Томасом Мразом🥹✨
Пойти в такой футболке к нему на концерт – мечта👏🏻
3. Ну слээээй💅🏻
Не знаю, что е…
Прямо сейчас бьюсь за сегодняшний видос как могу.
Афина сломала мышку и весь процесс монтажа натуральная пытка, где раньше 5-секундное действие занимает у меня не меньше 3 минут. Я понятия не имею, как успеть это сделать, потому что до сих пор пытаюсь нарезать черновик.
Новая мышка придет завтра, а сегодня, надеюсь, вы поймете, почему монтаж попроще обычного.
Я сделал парочку высоких симов и предлагаю вам их заценить. Это как еще один мой видос на 25 минут, но на другом канале.
https://youtu.be/6hpFB3DxHD4
Вообще было весело. Смело пишите в комментах, если хотите видеть мои творения в следующих раундах этой битвы.
Крайне актуальный мемный вторник.
Вообще спасибо за беседу об ИИ. Главное помнить, что наше несогласие не делает нас врагами. И да, я все читал, но с аргументами не согласен и все еще не считаю даже самое активное вовлечение в промпт творчеством. Для меня это пока так и остается умением поставить задачу чему-то другому и ожиданием, что оно подойдет достаточно точно.
Я строил домики в Симс.
Появилась Даша и теперь стройка домиков у меня в реальной жизни.
В играх я перешел на уже полноценные города в Ситис.
А последние дни Даша присматривается к огромным полям посреди леса в Подмосковье, которые можно превратить в закрытый поселок, как у нас.
Мам, забери меня, я напуган..
😁628🥰88❤82🤣35🔥16🐳3💘3😨3
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @RomanShevyakov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 649,103 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Roman Shevyakov” (@RomanShevyakov), 20,367 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RomanShevyakov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.