Video, posted without a caption
🔥3

Channel
@RokoCitadel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
175subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001896146779 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RokoCitadel |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 9 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RokoCitadel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 175 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 175 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
76 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 27 | 35.5% | |
| ❤ | 23 | 30.3% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 25.0% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 3.95% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 3.95% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2023 to 26 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
🔥3
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥3❤1
setting up print farm
with embedded proof of print
Roko Github is in the works, repos may be private initially until mvp launch as far as I know. A few of the devs are settling back into routine after travels to Lisbon for Urbit conference. Next week things will pick up speed. @LordRoko has been holding down the fort slaying autogen and staying on top of all the new open-source releases and synergies with autogen. Will get caught up to speed pretty quickly there 🫡
👍3👀1
Voice message, posted without a caption
🔥5
Video, posted without a caption
roko box housing otw
❤2
We just added a 3rd core member to the Roko Multi-sig safe. We've had the pleasure of working with individual for a number of years now, they are playing a key role in development of Roko and hold the interest of tech and community at heart. New Safe Signer Address: 0x560F45677c2Ddd24108BF23B950f1651E437194A Existing Safe Addresses: 0x6cdDA44E3B32bf1F2Ef0dbA7AF81A49a5558184f (rokoguardian.eth) 0x71c5957B5998d9ff8E…
🤝3❤1👍1
Users who want to run their own nodes will be using PKI using hardware wallets. Right now the hardware we are putting together will have Zymbit hsms which we just recently acquired via proposal funding for testing. We are working on a way to distribute cloud access to nodes, and also designing a consumer ready box that you can run locally at home. The hardware boxes should be starting to get assembled starting some…
👍13🔥1
Hey heads up, we clawed back 3 billion tokens from one of our core contributors as an internal consensus that the contributor received a disproportionate amount of tokens for their current role. Due the crazy amount of growth we've received since payment back in May, we are to making sure were always holding our team to a standard and putting the growth of our network first. On that note we also are looking to bring…
❤7🔥1
First payment to fund Logris the Bard for R&D tokenomics proposal complete. https://snapshot.org/#/rokonetwork.eth/proposal/0x0c18254c6b35d8b7e24f2c0e74ac0b6130c44c046825ad3a08218d671e8fe8cb Treasury $ROKO swap for $USDC https://etherscan.io/tx/0x77a87052ae720978210319d1792d3b29c8ff9eaf2842ac6f4fd66656f74e0fda Treasury Transfer of 10,000 $USDC to LogrisTheBard.eth https://etherscan.io/tx/0x6ad0b68e0310a578a9aea141…
🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RokoCitadel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 616,982 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@RokoCitadel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ꭱꮻꮶꮻ Ꮯꮖꭲꭺꭰꭼꮮ” (@RokoCitadel), 175 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RokoCitadel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.