Channel
@RogueIQ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
89,184subscribers
-312 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002695764866 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RogueIQ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RogueIQ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 89,184 | -35 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 89,219 | -101 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 89,320 | -55 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 89,375 | -66 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 89,441 | -55 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 89,496 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 89,496 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 14 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
73,627 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 8,823 | 12.0% | |
| 🤩 | 8,611 | 11.7% | |
| 😍 | 8,344 | 11.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8,156 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 8,121 | 11.0% | |
| 👍 | 8,026 | 10.9% | |
| ❤ | 7,984 | 10.8% | |
| 🥰 | 7,861 | 10.7% | |
| 🎉 | 7,692 | 10.4% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.005% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.003% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.001% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.001% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.001% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73,627reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2025 to 2 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
In the game of money, you have to learn to adapt quickly if needed. Always have a plan, but be dynamic. My updated plan for $HYPE, despite the flood of FUD on the timeline. Fundamentals for the company haven't changed and I'm not an account that can be paid off or feel entitled to airdrop rewards (I don't participate in them). So at least you know I'm giving you my real plan.
❤🔥246❤226👍226💯221🔥215🥰213🎉211🤩201
Sorry folks, I haven't been around much. Markets are weak, so I don't focus on it because there isn't anything to say. Focusing on acquiring my next business instead. I had a few thoughts in my head this evening though. Sharing it here for fun: - Retailers still haven't learned to sell and we're still greedy af - PENGU is proof that mass attention ≠ strong token price - XRP is proof that CT sentiment doesn't matt…
❤250🤩230👍228🔥225🥰216❤🔥214😍208💯204
Crypto’s buy strength is weak af. Market is showing that it clearly cannot sustain any upward path right now. Why? Because greedy MFers ruined the game this cycle. DATs. Seriously, wtf. Clear ponzis. More infra with insane valuations with no user demand in sight. Meme gamblers. 10/10 wiped many people out. But it’s also an opportunity to reset our industry. Let’s do better moving forward!
🤩752❤732😍727👍694🔥683🎉680💯666❤🔥661
BTC is below 90k How are you feeling? 5% of you are excited that there's an opportunity to buy lower 95% of you have crapped yourselves because BTC tanking continues to crush your alts If you're in the latter camp, this is your very real reminder to stop gambling in crypto
❤🔥618💯592🤩587❤583😍582🎉579👍573🔥569
What's going to happen next in the market? Your favorite KOLs know best, right? 👎 My answer: I have no idea. But I do have a plan and that's why you're here at Rogue IQ. I arm you with the tools, I don't do it for you. Markets look weak tho. New boxes on the chart. Grabbed more on the dip and ready to sell trading bag if there's upside While still having reserves for downside, then the chops If it hits the 'mar…
🔥583❤🔥580❤566😍563💯555🤩555🥰548👍542
A big lesson I learned early on is not to trust people's words if they're selling you something. I was scammed a few times long ago, and each time drained most of my hard-earned savings. It was partially my fault, because I was always so desperate to get out of my crappy job that I rushed due diligence, blind to red flags, and just generally inexperienced to flashy salesmen. Super painful lessons NGL. It took a lot…
😍1,180❤🔥1,160💯1,150🥰1,150❤1,140🔥1,140🤩1,130👍1,070
I know most of you are hurting right now with the market dumping, but this is why Rogue IQ is about teaching the realities and executing real strategy for money, especially volatile ones Unlike the endless list of max extracting KOLs, I don't sell you anything or get paid to post I simply want you to learn. So what do we have today? $HYPE is down 8%, right into the range. So I'll start to rebuild my trading positi…
😍443💯263🤩132❤🔥129❤74👍62🔥57🥰50
Bagged 22.9% profits with $HYPE at $48 Money is only real when you sell. This is a good muscle to build, especially in crypto Still have my long term bag, the sell was just for the range trading No stress money management Now I'd like for it to hit the bottom of the range so I can reload. If it continues upward, it's all good because I'm still in the game If it dumps, it's all good too because it would be from m…
💯890🤩634❤🔥259👍199🔥195🥰112🎉103😍65
Saw the business this week and it was great. Better than my expectations! Immediately moved to talking to my lender and lawyers to draw up a LOI. Rogue IQ learning: LOI is a Letter of Intent It translates to: "I intend to buy your business MFer, so let's make a deal!"
🥰366👍360🔥354🎉353😍348❤🔥339🤩322💯317
Shared on my X the details of the investment I'm analysing. Sale price: $3M Annual net profit (business + rentals): $500k I shared two lending scenarios and what I think about this opportunity. More to come, but read this for now if you want to follow along → https://x.com/rogue_says/status/1981736314811678896
🤩790🔥736🎉712😍710❤709👍705🥰700❤🔥664
hey Rogue IQ fam. I've been a bit more quiet here, but that's because the markets look weak, so I'm not paying much attention to it right now. Re-iterating that’s why sitting in spot on high conviction tokens or stonks is where you want to be. There's no stress when markets are down. Instead, I've been taking time to focus on analyzing the commercial investment property I mentioned. Initial analysis look solid. I'…
💯254🥰231👍225😍223🔥222❤221❤🔥211🤩210
Luke Martin shared this image on X. It shows that even though BTC is over $100k, the top 50 altcoins are trading BELOW where they were post-FTX crash. That’s why crypto retail is feeling pain and feels like there was no alt season. This is exactly why I say that diamond hands for alts is a narrative for suckers. And one we all fell for at some point. There are a few exceptions, like HYPE and BNB, but that’s becau…
🤩663❤🔥659💯644❤643😍635🎉634🔥632👍626
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @RogueIQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,057,316 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rogue IQ” (@RogueIQ), 89,184 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RogueIQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.