Rindu bangat ;)
β€7

Channel
@Roesjad
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
4,435subscribers
-790 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003506323679 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Roesjad |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Roesjad |
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 4,435 | -41 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 4,476 | -26 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 4,502 | -73 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 4,575 | -49 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:45 | 4,624 | -57 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 4,681 | -62 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 4,743 | -50 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 4,793 | -62 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 4,855 | -74 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 4,929 | -95 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 5,024 | -46 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:20 | 5,070 | -124 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 5,194 | -31 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 5,225 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
207 reactions across 6 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 88 | 42.5% | |
| β€ | 46 | 22.2% | |
| π | 25 | 12.1% | |
| π | 14 | 6.76% | |
| π | 11 | 5.31% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 7 | 3.38% | |
| π | 5 | 2.42% | |
| β‘ | 4 | 1.93% | |
| π | 3 | 1.45% | |
| π₯ | 3 | 1.45% | |
| π | 1 | 0.483% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 207 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @Roesjad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Rindu bangat ;)
β€7
Rinduβ€οΈ
γ € Maklumat Pembubaran. Telah cukup musim berlalu, telah cukup pula kisah ditulis oleh tangan-tangan yang pernah berhimpun di bawah naungan yang sama. Apa yang dahulu dirajut dengan harap dan dipelihara dengan kebersamaan, kini kami lepaskan dengan ikhlas kepada arus waktu. Kepada nama-nama yang pernah singgah maupun menetap, tiada luput kami ucapkan terima kasih sepanjang masa, biarlah kenang, pelajaran serta kebaikβ¦
π81β€21π21π7
Sticker, posted without a caption
Happy National Girlfriendβs Day, Seroja! Boleh rate outfit aku hari ini? πββοΈ
β€5π3β€βπ₯2π2π2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sebagian orang merayakan sore dengan tawa, sebagian lagi dengan pertemuan yang hangat. Aku merayakannya dengan ketenangan, duduk bersama pikiranku sendiri dan menerima bahwa hidup tidak selalu berjalan sesuai harapan. Ada kehilangan yang tak bisa diperbaiki, ada rindu yang tak menemukan alamat pulang, namun ada pula diriku yang tetap bertahan meski berkali-kali dipatahkan. Dan mungkin, itu sudah lebih dari cukup untuβ¦
π6β‘4π4π4β€3β€βπ₯1
Hari Jumat menyapa begitu cerah dengan cuaca yang bersahabat, sepertinya cakrawala sudah mengetahui bahwa Roesjad's Sunghoon telah memiliki rencana untuk menghabiskan waktunya yang begitu berharga bersama teman-temannya yang terkasih, SchΓ€fer's Sunghoon dan Nikolovich's Sunghoon. Pada awalnya, langkah kaki kami mengarah tanpa tujuan yang pasti. Tetapi, kami tidak masalah selagi bisa mengabadikan momen satu sama lainβ¦
β€5π4β€βπ₯3π₯3π2π1π1
Sticker, posted without a caption
bagaimana gerangan kabarmu? mudah mudahan musim masih sudi menyisakan takjub bagi mereka yang berjalan tanpa tergesa. adapun hari-hariku belakangan tiada lebih daripada sehimpun laku yang sederhana: menadah cahaya yang luruh di ambang petang, menyelubungi diri tatkala angin mulai beroleh dinginnya, mengulum senyum pada perkara yang tampak remeh, lalu membiarkan langkah berkelana sekadar menyapa dunia. selebihnya biarβ¦
β€5π3π3π2β€βπ₯1π1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Roesjad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 39 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
β(πππππππ) WISMA ROESJAD.β (@Roesjad), 4,435 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Roesjad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.