Channel
@RoccoAnalysis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
272subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001731896890 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RoccoAnalysis |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RoccoAnalysis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 272 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 278 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 279 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 279 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇸🇮🇷Iran tells Houthis to shut down the Red Sea shipping route if the U.S. strikes its power network the next circus will be the closure of the Strait of Bab el-Mandeb (Red Sea). That would effectively halt Saudi oil exports. If this news breaks out of the blue, Aramco’s stock could plunge in a very short time
Signed reminder
For the latest updates in the cryptoworld
Signed reminder
https://t.me/RoccoAnalysisNew
❤1👍1
Signed reminder
💰Never trust a 'privacy coin' promoted by the system that hate privacy ..
Signed reminder
🇺🇸📞 Another day, another Trump scam. Trump Mobile quietly updated the T1 Phone terms: "your preorder does NOT guarantee the phone will ever be produced or shipped". 600.000 people already paid deposits months ago
Signed reminder
Most people don’t know this, but Trump already excluded Bitcoin from being “money” under the law. At best BTC can now only be treated as an asset 📱What has, however, been officially recognized as money by Trump? Stablecoins (read CBDC’s) through the GENIUS Act — not to be confused with the current Clarity Act
Signed reminder
📱🇺🇸The U.S. Senate has released the 309-page Clarity Act draft ahead of Thursday’s launch/markup, aiming to create clear crypto regulations and define whether digital assets fall under the SEC or CFTC They will probably implement it like this: Blockchains - CFTC Tokens - SEC
Signed reminder
The says that the frozen $344 million USDT by Tether was linked to Iran Not so neutral after all
🤡1
Signed reminder
📱📱Two Tron addresses holding about $344.2 million in USDT have been frozen in the last fifty minutes, including one with $131.3 million and another with $212.9 million This is how your CBDC is gonna work
Signed reminder
🇪🇸👮♀️Spanish police shut down a major illegal manga platform after 10 years—they found two Ledger wallets hidden inside a wall thermometer, holding over €400,000
🤯1
Signed reminder
🍌 Eric Trump's reaction on Justin Sun's lawsuit against their imperium
Signed reminder
💰❌Another blockchain has fallen—this time it’s Arbitrum. They froze funds on their chain that were allegedly stolen, proving it’s not decentralized but centrally controlled—a major risk for your holdings. 🇰🇵The Arbitrum Security Council seized ~$70.9M in ETH from the KelpDAO exploiter and sent it to a burn address
Signed reminder
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RoccoAnalysis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ROCCO ANALYSIS” (@RoccoAnalysis), 272 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RoccoAnalysis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.