5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,884–8,934 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 08:26
8,890
-14
12 Aug 2026, 23:02
8,904
-12
10 Aug 2026, 08:18
8,916
-12
7 Aug 2026, 16:37
8,928
+2
7 Aug 2026, 06:15
8,926
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.85%
avg views ÷ 8,890 subscribers
Avg views / post
342
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.775%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
52 (4 August 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
17,804
Reactions total
138
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,020
Videos
≈19
Links
≈3,220
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
138 reactions across 52 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👀
93
67.4%
👍
41
29.7%
👨💻
1
0.725%
💯
1
0.725%
😁
1
0.725%
🙏
1
0.725%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#Blog #MarketWeekAhead
🚀 A week of key signals for the markets
🌎 China, the UK, the US and Japan - several of the world’s largest economies will release data that could shift investor expectations.
🇨🇳 China - industrial production and retail sales.
🇬🇧 UK - the latest inflation figures.
🇺🇸 US - minutes from the latest FOMC meeting.
🇯🇵 Japan - trade data and inflation.
📊 Each release could act as a catalyst for mo…
#TradingIdeas #StocksAnalysis
🔔 Top investment stock for 17 August
#TSLA 🚗 Tesla – recovery within ascending channel ⬆️
Tesla continues to recover within an ascending channel after rebounding from recent lows, with the price approaching the upper half of the range. A sustained move above 345.00 could open the way for further upside towards 355.00–360.00.
#MU 💻 Micron Technology – continuation within upward struc…
#WeeklyOverview
🔝 The key economic events of the week!
🔹 Monday 17 August – Japan Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Japan’s GDP growth will directly influence investor confidence in domestic demand and export performance, setting the tone for the Japanese equity market.
🔹 Wednesday 19 August – Eurozone Consumer Price Index (CPI)
If Eurozone CPI exceeds expectations, the risk of ECB tightening could rise, weighing on …
#TradingIdeas #ForexAnalysis
🔔 Forex trading ideas for 17 August
#GOLD 🟡 Trend continuation ⬆️
XAUUSD continues to rise, with support formed at 4345.00. Resistance is at 4445.00. A break above this level could open the way for further upside towards 4590.00.
#USDCHF 🇺🇸/🇨🇭 Bullish trend ⬆️
USDCHF has formed support at 0.8040. Resistance is at 0.8205. A break above this level could open the way for further upside …
#Blog #StocksAnalysis
#XOM 🛢 ExxonMobil doubled its profit as oil prices rallied, and the stock is setting up for a potential breakout.
💰 Q2 2026: Net profit rose 105% year-on-year, free cash flow jumped 219%, and US$ 9.4 billion was returned to shareholders.
📊 Technical setup: A break above the USD 158 resistance level could open the way towards USD 177, with risk defined at USD 151.
❓ What could trigger the nex…
#TradingIdeas #StocksAnalysis
🔔 Results of the week: 10.08.2026 – 14.08.2026
#JPM 🏦 JPMorgan Chase – target reached (Forecast was made here)
As forecast, JPMorgan Chase continued to rise within the broader uptrend and broke above resistance at 360.00. The upside target at 365.00 has been reached.
#ORCL ⌨️ Oracle – moving towards the target (Forecast was made here)
As forecast, Oracle continued to rise within the…
#MarketReview
🔥 Top 5 hottest events of this week
Don’t miss the most important news. More analytics here.
#DE40 🇩🇪 The DE40 index reached a new all-time high of 26,590. Slowing inflation is boosting investor optimism about the European Central Bank’s future policy moves. In addition, the German economy is emerging from stagnation.
#GOLD 🟡 Gold prices reached $4,440 per ounce. Following the latest US CPI data, …
#TradingIdeas #ForexAnalysis
🔔 Results of the week: 10.08.2026 – 14.08.2026
#AUDCHF 🇦🇺/🇨🇭 Prices are moving towards the target (Forecast was made here)
As forecast, the AUDCHF currency pair continued its rise within the uptrend and broke above the 0.5730 resistance level. The upside target at 0.5790 remains in focus.
#GBPCHF 🇬🇧/🇨🇭 Prices are moving towards the target (Forecast was made here)
As forecast, the GBP…
#MarketAlert
⚡️15:30 (GMT+3) 🇺🇸 Producer Price Index MoM (Jul)
Forecast 0.2% / Previous -0.3%
⚡️15:30 (GMT+3) 🇺🇸 Initial Jobless Claims
Forecast 202K / Previous 199K
The market’s focus today is on the upcoming US PPI data, with producer prices projected to rise by 0.2% month-on-month. The release could influence expectations for the Fed’s future policy.
👍2👀1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @RoboForex_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
❓ Will Reinforcement Learning ever consistently outperform the market?
🔹 Yes, it is a matter of computing power and data44%
🔹 Yes, but only under certain market conditions33%
🔹 No, the market is too dynamic6%
🔹 Not sure yet – I am following developments in the technology17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 370,882 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RoboForex Official” (@RoboForex_Official), 8,890 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RoboForex_Official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.