Channel
@Robinn_drm
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
30subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003693534240 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Robinn_drm |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Robinn_drm |
@Robinn_drm was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 30 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 28 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 31 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 31 | first reading |
39 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (19 July 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,458 |
| Reactions total | 182 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
188 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5215405592423717954 | 55 | 29.3% | |
| custom 5215455044677165038 | 52 | 27.7% | |
| 🍓 | 29 | 15.4% | |
| 💋 | 25 | 13.3% | |
| 🕊 | 21 | 11.2% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 1.60% | |
| 👾 | 3 | 1.60% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Robinn_drm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩 🤍🤍🤍// 🎀ew post.▫️ Дармилион — город, наполненный звоном монет и стремлением к наживе. Почти с каждого угла сыплются деньги, люди поют о сделках, а дороги пахнут успехом! Этот город по-своему прекрасен: его пейзажи, его люди, его стремления... это дарит вдохновение.🤩🤩 Но иногда люди слишком увлекаются своими желаниями, своими личными заботами, забывая о человечности, ведь богатство часто может вскружить голову... …
Sticker, posted without a caption
𝘵𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘰 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘦 🤩 🤩🤩🥹☺️ этом городе звон монет заглушает искренние слова, а ложь слишком часто оказывается дороже правды. Каждый день кто-то делает новую ставку, надеясь, что именно сегодня удача подарит ему новую жизнь… или заберёт последнюю надежду. ✨ 🤩🤩🥹☺️очешь увидеть этот город глазами Зарянки? Тогда скорее заходи на её канал.🤩❗️ 🤩🤩🥹☺️обро пожаловать в Дармилион. Пусть даже среди лжи, ри…
Sticker, posted without a caption
about mp. 1. 0+. 2. не делаем вп с каналами, которые входят в базовые дни. 3. промежуток между вп — 10 минут. 4. удаляем вп спустя день. вп предлагать под этим постом. рт пост .
Sticker, posted without a caption
𝘐 𝘩𝘰𝘱𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘯 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘧𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥. 😻😻💜💜💜 🤩 𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘦𝘹𝘵 𝘮𝘦 𝘮𝘱 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 🤩
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @Robinn_drm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 908,190 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Robinn_drm named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓫𝓲𝓻𝓭 𝓲𝓼 𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓲𝓷!” (@Robinn_drm), 30 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Robinn_drm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.