Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RixAI | Нейросети с кайфом

Channel

RixAI | Нейросети с кайфом

@RixAiHub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

5,955subscribers

+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003159841609
TypeChannel
Username@RixAiHub
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RixAiHub

Growth

5,9375,9555,9467 August 2026 — 5,937 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,937 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,939 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,942 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,947 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,943 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,941 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,944 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,951 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,955 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 22 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,934–5,958 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 01:045,955+4
26 Aug 2026, 21:035,951+7
23 Aug 2026, 23:355,944+3
20 Aug 2026, 15:025,941-2
17 Aug 2026, 11:065,943-4
14 Aug 2026, 03:595,947+5
11 Aug 2026, 00:565,942+3
8 Aug 2026, 08:505,939+2
7 Aug 2026, 19:015,937no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:545,937first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 5,955 subscribers
Avg views / post
951
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held25 (13 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total7,604
Reactions total446
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,467 reactions across 25 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍62742.7%
🔥62042.3%
855.79%
😁724.91%
🤔422.86%
🐳130.886%
👏70.477%
🫡10.068%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,467reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 25 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RixAiHub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC509 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

Немного комментариев про PDF выше

🔥13👍5

11 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC561 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Разобрал по косточкам режимы ChatGPT и Claude 😎 Началось с простого вопроса: чем Chat отличается от Work, а Cowork от Code? Полез в документацию и залип на три дня 😁 Собрал всё в PDF-пособие: 37 страниц, 17 живых скринов с пометками - что где нажимать и куда уходят ваши файлы. Внутри: — какие режимы есть у обеих компаний и зачем каждый нужен — три вопроса, которые стоит задавать вместо «какой режим включить» — куд

👍35🔥82

11 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC768 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📌 Заметка Последнее время я очень много работал на таких моделях как Opus 5 и Fable 5 (это модели от компании Antropic, она же Claude). Скажу так, что Opus 5 мне вообще не нравится с точки зрения обсуждения и решения логических задач (в разработке я его не тестировал). Что такое логические задачи тоже поясню (а то может неверно подобрал термин). Например, составление стратегического документа, создание статей, инст

👍30🐳2

10 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC906 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Считаю, что за прошлую неделю я смог выжать максимум соков из этой компании на все 198% 😁 Ну а завтра я дам вам один полезный материал для изучения. Пока не буду спойлерить. Пару дней назад задался вопросом «...». В итоге решил осветить его и вам. А у вас как по лимитам? Выжимаете весь тариф на максимум?

👍23🔥20😁5

9 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC980 views92 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Немного личного обо мне (а почему бы и нет) Очень-очень редко пишу про себя и личную жизнь. Наверное, за ~год ведения канала было от силы 2-3 небольших поста. Думаю, надо это поправить. Меня зовут Максим (по совместительству RixAI). Почему выбрал именно такое название напишу чуть ниже. На данный момент мне 23 года. Полностью и full-тайм я занят двумя вещами: • развитие социальных сетей (собственными силами) • AI (п

👍7511🐳6

8 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC≈1,180 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

📃 PDF ПРОТОКОЛ — 5 признаков умирающего чата, промпт дайджеста, шаблон вводного сообщения, правила гигиены

🔥50👍7👏4

8 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC≈1,160 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

НОВОЕ ВИДЕО на 🎞 канале Тема: Почему ИИ тупеет в длинном чате? Разбор + фикс Ссылка для просмотра: https://youtu.be/DyNZ5i2gNio В видео поделился своими мыслями: — мой реальный чат, где одно и то же правило пришлось напомнить 13 раз — почему из памяти модели первым вылетает именно твоё правило из первого сообщения — три года независимых замеров: Стэнфорд, Microsoft, Salesforce, инженеры Chroma — и один и тот же выв

🔥53👍82👏2

5 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC≈1,540 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍51🔥2410

30 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC≈2,010 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

POV: как мы выглядим в глазах нейросети, когда пытаемся дать ей НУЖНЫЙ контекст и описать задачу 😁 P.S. по крайней мере я так ощущал себя до какого-то времени.

😁41🔥43🫡1

30 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,780 views57 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

НОВОЕ ВИДЕО на 🎞 канале Так-с. Я считаю, что «трилогию» на текущий момент можно зафиналить. Конечно, в процессе обязательно буду еще дополнять другими видео в специальный плейлист: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKNIyxAlgnlc. В этом же плейлисте будут и практически шаги (следующие видео). Следующим этапом пора бы немного попрактиковаться 🫡 как раз сейчас занялся небольшим оформлением GitHub - там и буду за

🔥49👍62

25 Jul 2026, 03:43 UTC≈2,300 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏁 Claude Opus 5 Вышел Opus 5. У Anthropic теперь почти вся линейка пятая: Sonnet 5, Fable 5, Mythos 5 и вот Opus 5 (Haiku пока держится). Если говорить по сухому, цена не изменилась: 5$ за 1 млн. токенов на вход / 25$ за 1 млн. токенов на выход - ровно как у Opus 4.8. Токен тут - кусочек слова, на такие нейросеть режет текст и по ним же считает деньги. Вход - то, что отправили вы, выход - то, что она написала в о

👍37🔥3

21 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC≈2,360 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вышла третья статья - и это первый случай, когда тему мне фактически заказал читатель (но в целом она логично ложилась в продолжение прошлой статьи) 📝 Тема: Как машина (ИИ) решает логическую задачу, если внутри одна статистика P.S. В прошлый раз хвастался: правок стало меньше, 46 → 45. В этой статье их вышло 51. Прогресс отменяется 🙂 Зато свод правил для ИИ пополнился целой новой главой. Начал постепенно через реал

👍67🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @RixAiHub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RixAI | Нейросети с кайфом” (@RixAiHub), 5,955 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RixAiHub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.