Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ritz Bets Tenis 🎾

Channel

Ritz Bets Tenis 🎾

@RitzBets_ATP

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,530subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001578184797
TypeChannel
Username@RitzBets_ATP
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RitzBets_ATP

Growth

5,5265,5505,5387 August 2026 — 5,548 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,548 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,550 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,542 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,539 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,531 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,526 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,533 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,534 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,530 subscribers5,5307 August 202628 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 22 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,522–5,554 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 15:535,530-4
26 Aug 2026, 01:045,534+1
23 Aug 2026, 09:135,533+7
20 Aug 2026, 02:525,526-5
16 Aug 2026, 17:485,531-8
13 Aug 2026, 08:485,539-3
10 Aug 2026, 02:165,542-8
7 Aug 2026, 11:425,550+2
7 Aug 2026, 01:305,548no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:205,548first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 5,530 subscribers
Avg views / post
809
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held47 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total38,030
Reactions total749
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

749 reactions across 34 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥42056.1%
27036.0%
597.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 749reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 03:20 UTC165 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

STAKE 3 🎾 ATP 1000 MONTREAL 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 Lo que está jugando Shelton no tiene sentido, hoy lo vi contra Mensik y que barbaridad, fue una paliza, dominó de inicio a fin a un jugador en el papel durísimo. Ya no es solo eso, todo el torneo ha estado sólido, también se cargó a Fonseca. No ha cedido un solo set, defiende título y está implicado al máximo. Tien ha tenido un camino bastante más sencillo a excepción de Tommy Paul

🔥4

11 Aug 2026, 23:53 UTC408 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Para mañana ⬇️ 🎾

  1. Apuesta Qualy Cincinnati 🇺🇸27%
  2. Apuesta Semifinales Montreal 🇨🇦43%
  3. COMBO / KIT 🔮30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9🔥21

11 Aug 2026, 23:53 UTC407 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Mercado hasta por gusto 👅 Ha empezado la qualy de Cincinnati y en paralelo tenemos las semifinales de Montreal. Tú decides amiguito 🫏

6🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC427 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Una de cal, otra de arena ⏳ ✅ Jodar - Fils (+21.5 juegos) 💀 Mensik (H +2.5 juegos)

6

11 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC766 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

STAKE 3 🎾 ATP 1000 MONTREAL 🇨🇦 🇨🇿 Mensik tiene un historial probado en grandes partidos, además de números destacados ante rivales del top 10. Es un campeón de Masters 1000, tiene esa jerarquía y experiencia. En pista dura, con el servicio que tienen el checo y americano, esto es claramente un partido 50/50, pero las cuotas no indican eso y tenemos que poner el valor del lado de Jakub. Agregar que si nos fijamos en

🔥1532

11 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC689 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

En breves vamos con otra apuesta 🫰🏻

🔥921

11 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC802 views75 reactionsread 12 August 2026

BUENOS DÍAS AMIGOS 🎨 👉🏻 Tenemos pendiente Jodar - Fils Como la jornada de Montreal se retrasó, hoy también tenemos lo siguiente: Mensik 🇨🇿 - 🇺🇸 Shelton Merida 🇪🇸 - Tien ¿Quieren apuesta de esos partidos? Reacciona aquí, simple. ✌🏻 🛎️ Activa notificaciones

🔥5718

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @RitzBets_ATP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 23:53 UTCFinal Results136 voters

Para mañana ⬇️ 🎾

  1. Apuesta Qualy Cincinnati 🇺🇸27%
  2. Apuesta Semifinales Montreal 🇨🇦43%
  3. COMBO / KIT 🔮30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTCAnonymous Poll276 voters

¿Qué partido les interesa más? 🐦‍🔥

  1. Schnaider 🇷🇺 - 🇵🇱 Swiatek8%
  2. Darderi 🇮🇹 - 🇺🇸 Nakashima13%
  3. Alexandrova 🇷🇺 - 🇺🇦 Svitolina8%
  4. Jodar 🇪🇸 - 🇫🇷 Fils71%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTCAnonymous Poll237 voters

¿Vamos con una apuesta? ⭐️ 🎾

  1. SÍ 🔥92%
  2. NO 👨🏿‍🌾8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🥇Pronosticos Apuestas Deportivas🥇
@apuestas_pronosticos_deportivas · 51,764
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
Pronósticos Fútbol 365 🇪🇸🇲🇽🇵🇪🇦🇷🇪🇨🇨🇴🇺🇸🇺🇾
@pronosticosfutbol365 · 54,704
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 August 2026
🥇Apuestas Deportivas | Futbol | Pronosticos⚽️
@Apuestas_Futbol_Deportivas · 54,751
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026
Pablo Ramirez - Apuesto un millón de pesos 🍋👊🏼🤑
@ramirezz_pablo · 56,286
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
LAS VIP GRATIS 💯🇵🇪
@stakes10gratis_gratis · 45,572
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026
AMBOS MARCAN ⚽️
@GratisAmbosMarcan · 57,914
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 23 August 2026
Apuestas Deportivas Pronosticos
@apuestas_deportivas_pronosticos · 70,787
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ritz Bets Tenis 🎾” (@RitzBets_ATP), 5,530 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RitzBets_ATP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.