Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Работает Рипли 🇷🇺

@RipleySniper

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,989subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002391122457
TypeChannel
Username@RipleySniper
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RipleySniper

Growth

2,9892,9962,992.56 August 2026 — 2,996 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,996 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,995 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,991 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,989 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,988–2,997 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:342,989-2
9 Aug 2026, 23:312,991-4
7 Aug 2026, 02:482,995-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:022,996no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:532,996first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 12 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
66.9%
avg views ÷ 2,989 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,000
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (12 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total10,001
Reactions total825
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 07s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,002 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
80426.8%
🫡68022.7%
🔥48116.0%
🤣35411.8%
❤‍🔥2528.39%
😢2377.89%
👍1685.60%
🤔150.5%
🤬80.266%
🤗30.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,002reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
28
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 17 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RipleySniper. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC817 views120 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Велес, спасибо тебе огромное за подарки❤️ Это было очень неожиданно и приятно. Особенно за вот эту штучку в коробке: я такие только на картинках видела, а теперь она и у меня есть😳 PS: Благодаря Велесу, Сереге Ш. и Таргаю, запас пуль и порохов у меня на год вперед. А может и больше🤝 Спасибо🫡

🔥70👍28❤‍🔥18🫡31

6 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC914 views201 reactions20 Starsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @veterany_60omsbPhoto

🫡 «Рипли» — снайпер бригады «ВЕТЕРАНЫ» В разведывательно-штурмовой бригаде «ВЕТЕРАНЫ» службу несёт девушка-снайпер с позывным «Рипли». В зоне специальной военной операции она находится с 2023 года, а в составе бригады «ВЕТЕРАНЫ» выполняет боевые задачи с 2024 года. До службы работала на оборонном предприятии физиком электронщиком. В свободное время увлекалась спортивной стрельбой из пневматического оружия, рыбалкой,

🫡7467👍28❤‍🔥19🔥13

29 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC≈1,980 views144 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Пацаны из бригадной разведки поделились крутым видосом работы групы огневой поддержки💪 У меня еще кое чего есть в запасе про работу группы, сама присутствовала, но тут прям красиво сделано. Гуляка умеет передать атмосферу😎

🔥96👍1817🫡8❤‍🔥4🤗1

25 Jul 2026, 04:39 UTC≈2,850 views162 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Когда вышли на бз на 2 дня и немного не рассчитали с провизией) PS это еще мангал в кадр не попал😁

🤣8828🔥23👍10❤‍🔥8🫡5

17 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC≈3,440 views198 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Боевые машины на задаче)) Счастливчик, Кедо, Ганс и Бутыр. Маньяки, которым только дай что-нибудь штурмануть или кого-нибудь завалить😁 Команда, проверенная событиями, о которых я когда-нибудь расскажу🇷🇺

🫡98❤‍🔥58🔥347👍1

14 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC≈3,430 views206 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Не знаю у кого как, но в нашем подразделении работа групп эвакуации, по моему сугубо личному мнению, одна из самых опасных и тяжелых. На первом месте штурмовики, на втором саперы, на третьем эвакуация. Когда можно будет, я расскажу немного больше о работе этих героических пацанов, но пока что только небольшой эпизод🫡

111🫡54❤‍🔥29🔥8👍2😢2

9 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC≈3,350 views171 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Позывной "Сынок" в составе разведгруппы на боевом выходе. Не вешай нос, братишка, главное что живой. PS мне рассказали как ты еще шутить умудрялся в сложившейся ситуации, ну тут вообще красавчик🫡

🫡79❤‍🔥56🔥1711👍8

6 Jul 2026, 09:58 UTC≈3,330 views168 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Блин) Все нажитое непосильным трудом на мусорку😏 PS да, сумка хохляцкая, трофей из Суджи🔥 Нравится, вот и ношу..

😢100🫡3818❤‍🔥7🤔5

19 Jun 2026, 05:01 UTC≈3,960 views187 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

2024 г., Горловка. Вуду отдыхает после задачи. Не то чтоб мы совсем вышли с бз, но почти. Атмосферная фотка.

107🫡37❤‍🔥30👍13

15 Jun 2026, 05:10 UTC≈4,330 views177 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Шутка не моя, но как будто бы моя😁

🤣117🔥32👍20🫡53

8 Jun 2026, 03:49 UTC≈4,820 views288 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Худой, он же Спаун. Впервые мы пересеклись с ним под Торецком, когда он по собственному желанию был переведен в разведку. У меня тогда особо не было времени в людях разбираться (было пофиг), но когда я увидела как Худой в одиночку тащит 3 км на плечах заправленный генератор под кассетными обстрелами и fpv, я немного, мягко говоря, офигела. Сходили на парочку выходов с ним и стало понятно, что в его случае не война

149🫡61🔥50❤‍🔥13👍13🤗2

4 Jun 2026, 18:00 UTC≈10,700 views190 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Окраины Суджи. Пару дней назад наши пацаны Р. и З. ушли на одну из улиц поселка Княжий и не вернулись. Нам нужно было найти бойцов и, при необходимости, зачистить улицу от противника. Пацанов нашли, оба 200, обоих хохлы застрелили из автомата. Прочесали улицу, все дома, гаражи и подвалы, хохлов не нашли. Видео с моей камеры gopro. Группу вел Кит, боевой командир, Герой России. Он мог бы и не участвовать в этом меро

😢117🫡5213🤬7👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @RipleySniper. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 939,769 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Работает Рипли 🇷🇺” (@RipleySniper), 2,989 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RipleySniper.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.