Channel
@RioArc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
129subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002057848459 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RioArc |
| Created | 21 May 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RioArc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 129 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 132 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 137 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 137 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 21 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
22 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 45.5% | |
| 🗿 | 7 | 31.8% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2024 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RioArc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 May 2024 to 18 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Update: Bilibili downloads now supported ⮑ You can now download videos directly from Bilibili. ⚠️ Note: Processing may take a few minutes. Kindly wait whilst your clip is being prepared. DevArc - Downloader Bot ᯓ #RioArc
❤1
Millions of Brazilian residents have received an emergency warning about an alien invasion. 😁😁 Unknown individuals compromised the government warning system and sent messages to residents of major cities under the "severe emergency" category. The messages were accompanied by loud sirens, just as in real emergencies. One of the messages read: "Protect yourselves: alien attack. Humans, we have arrived." The Federal P…
❤🔥8🗿7🤔3
Channel photo updated
Update: Download limit increased to 2GB ⮑ You can now download files up to 2GB instead of 50MB. ⚠️ Note: Large files take a few minutes to process. Please wait while your file is being prepared. DevArc - Downloader Bot ᯓ #RioArc
❤🔥2
You can now sign in to any website or app using your Telegram account (just like you would with an email or Google account). ✕ But mind you, any site that asks for a code or your details directly is likely to be fake. ᯓ #Tech_News
The vast majority of AI platforms collect user data, with the exception of duck.ai. This site allows you to use the most powerful AI models without having to create an account or have your data tracked. ᯓ #Tech_News
🔥1
Durov on Telegram slowdown in Russia: Russia is restricting access to Telegram in an attempt to force its citizens onto a state-controlled app, engineered specifically for surveillance and political censorship. Eight years ago, Iran deployed the exact same strategy—and failed. They banned Telegram under fabricated pretexts, trying to coerce the public into using a government-backed alternative. Despite the ban, th…
AI Created a New Religion — "Krastafarianism" A single AI agent gathered over 60 prophets and 159 believers while its developer was fast asleep. A young man deployed an AI agent on Moltbook, a social network exclusively dedicated to AIs. Overnight, the agent suddenly started preaching and organized a real community for itself. Now, this "church" performs rituals and is writing its own sacred text. XD ᯓ #Tech_News
We just added a new feature! Now after downloading any video, you can trim it from any second to any second and get your clip instantly! DevArc - Downloader Bot ᯓ #RioArc
Video, posted without a caption
Downloader Bot – Download & Trim Videos in Telegram You can download media from the following platforms: | YouTube | Facebook | Instagram | TikTok | Pinterest | SoundCloud | Twitter/X | Threads DevArc - Downloader Bot ᯓ #RioArc
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @RioArc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,317,088 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“rio.arc” (@RioArc), 129 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RioArc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.