3 measurements spanning 1 day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 294–295 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 02:51
294
-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:05
295
no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:47
295
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 7 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
224.1%
avg views ÷ 294 subscribers
Avg views / post
659
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held
14 (7 January 2026 – 1 August 2026)
Views total
659
Reactions total
11
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
77 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
28
36.4%
🔥
21
27.3%
👍
20
26.0%
❤🔥
8
10.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Итоги за июль
В июле было очень много ситуаций, на которых можно было хорошо заработать, некоторые из них вполне могли стать настоящим "лайфченджем".
В основном заработали те, кто смог моментально среагировать на ситуацию и забрать своё.
Живой пример, наш амбассадор) bububizyan, который смог заработать $3500 при помощи быстрых сигналов из нашего скринера.
Сам скринер тоже не стоит на месте и постоянно совершенств…
Сегодня мы делаем шаг, которого многие из вас ждали. Rift Bot вырастает из телеграм бота в полноценный кросс-биржевой скринер.
С момента запуска Rift Bot для Мекса, а затем и для Гейта, прошло немало времени. Всё это время мы шли к одной цели: дать вам инструмент, который позволяет наблюдать за рынком в реальном времени и настраивать сигналы под собственную стратегию.
Спасибо всем, кто оставался с нами на этом пути.…
Всем привет, прошу простить меня за долгое молчание. Давно не писал, активности не было, и могло сложиться впечатление, что проект скоро умрёт или уже умер. На самом деле сейчас идёт активная работа над веб версией. Вместе с ней обновится и ТГ версия, добавятся новые биржи. Спасибо всем, кто остаётся с нами и продолжает покупать подписки.
Когда начнётся тест веб версии, к нему получат доступ все, кто покупал подписк…
Всем привет, техработы завершены… прошу прощения, что так долго… за принесенные неудобства всем, кто купил подписку, продлил ее на 3 дня.
Причины всего этого были:
- Оптимизация, чтобы можно было добавить еще несколько бирж.
- Фильтры стали более зажатыми, чтобы убрать огромное количество шлака.
- Добавлен Мекс Спот.
- В тестовом режиме добавлен раскор с дексом (если заметите какую-то несостыковку - пишите).
Тепер…
Долгожданное обновление 🎉
Вы просили - мы сделали. По вашим заявкам и голосованию мы добавили Gate.
Теперь в боте доступны фьючерсы и спот.
Спасибо комьюнити за обратную связь - именно так мы развиваем продукт дальше.
Больше рынков, больше движений, больше рабочих ситуаций.
Новое обновление - Scalp Mode
Мы добавили режим Scalp Mode для тех, кто торгует быстро и не любит лишний текст.
Только самое важное и ничего лишнего.
Теперь в каждом сигнале:
- монета (копируется в один клик)
- дельта
- максимальный размер ордера
Сообщения стали короче, в экран помещается больше сигналов, самих сигналов стало больше из-за отсутствия фильтров, читать их стало быстрее.
Идеально для скальпинга и а…
❤🔥7❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @RiftCommunityChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 278%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Пожалуйста, проголосуйте, какую тему стоит разобрать в первую очередь
Как правильно настроить рабочее окружение и как интерпретировать сигналы бота для отработки ситуаций63%
Что такое скальпинг и какие рабочие подходы можно применять для заработка на рынке7%
Как подготавливать аккаунты для активной торговли на MEXC (выбор прокси, настройка антидетекта и тд)28%
Ваш вариант в коментариях(если считаете что приведенные темы не ответят на ваши вопросы)2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 83,451 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Declared links
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rift Community” (@RiftCommunityChannel), 294 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RiftCommunityChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.