2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13–15 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 00:46
14
no change
9 Aug 2026, 18:15
14
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
6
Links
1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
50 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5422584575580726060
15
30.0%
💯
14
28.0%
custom 5204271353565300127
9
18.0%
👍
6
12.0%
🏆
4
8.00%
custom 5393467158330090163
2
4.00%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 7 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Richard_leads. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2026 to 6 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сейчас мы расширяем команду ❤️
Если давно хотел попробовать себя в сфере УБТ, но тебя останавливали расходы на аккаунты, поиск контента или создание роликов - у нас все устроено иначе.
Мы уже подготовили систему, в которой:
✅ выдаем готовые прогретые аккаунты под нужную тематику
✅ предоставляем готовый контент
✅ объясняем процесс по понятному мануалу
✅ не требуем покупать курсы или вкладывать деньги в старт.
По су…
🔥Trend Watch
За последний год мы заметили одну интересную тенденцию.
Все больше команд перестают покупать десятки отдельных сервисов и начинают строить собственые системы.
Раньше процесс выглядел так:
🔻один сервис искал тренды;
🔻второй анализировал конкурентов;
🔻 третий помогал с монтажом;
🔻четвертый публиковал контент;
🔻пятый собирал статистику.
В итоге - куча подписок, ручной работы и постоянное переключение м…
™️ TikTok делает ставку на AI
Похоже, TikTok всерьез взял курс на автоматизацию создания рекламы.
Платформа представила Symphony Agent - AI-инструмент, который помогает создавать рекламные кампании на основе трендов, текстовых запросов и примеров популярных роликов. Кроме того, TikTok запустил Agentic Hub - пространство, где AI-инструменты для рекламы работают напрямую с платформой.
Что это значит для нас?
✅ AI в…
Что я заметил работая по УБТ
Чем больше общаюсь с новичками, тем чаще вижу одну и ту же ошибку.
Люди слишком много времени уделяют поиску идеальной схемы и слишком мало - объему действий.
Условно:
Человек неделю ищет связку.
Находит.
Заливает 3 видео.
Не получает результат.
Переходит искать новую связку.
А другой за это время выкладывает 100–200 роликов и получает статистику, с которой уже можно работать.
Сейча…
🌐 Новости мира трафика и контента
За последний год рынок контента изменился сильнее, чем за предыдущие пять лет.
Если раньше для запуска проекта нужны были монтажеры, дизайнеры, копирайтеры и целая команда, то сейчас большую часть работы закрывает AI.
Что это значит для траферов?
🔺Контента становится больше.
🔺Конкуренция растет быстрее.
🔺Побеждает уже не тот, кто умеет монтировать, а тот, кто быстрее тестирует …
🚀 НОВЫЙ ЗАПУСК. НОВЫЙ ЭТАП. НОВЫЕ ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ.
За последнее время мы серьезно усилили направление по УБТ-трафику и продолжаем масштабироваться.
⚙️ Что за машина?
Мы разработали собственную контент-машину, которая позволяет быстро находить и перерабатывать контент под нужные задачи.
Что она умеет:
✅ Анализирует контент, который сейчас набирает просмотры.
✅ Находит самые залетающие форматы и связки.
✅ Автоматичес…
⭐Добро пожаловать на канал 𝑹𝒊𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒅
На этом канале я буду показывать:
🚀 Запуски новых проектов и их развитие в реальном времени.
💰 Способы заработка в интернете, которые действительно работают.
💼 Кейсы, связки, трафик, автоматизацию и всё, что связано с масштабированием онлайн-бизнеса.
🗞 Новости из мира арбитража, УБТ, AI и современных технологий.
⚙️ Собственные инструменты и разработки, которые помогают получат…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Richard_leads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 712,096 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Блог 𝑹𝒊𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒅 🪬” (@Richard_leads), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Richard_leads.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
