Channel
@RichardKingHub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
745subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002158769955 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RichardKingHub |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RichardKingHub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 745 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 744 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 April 2026 – 15 July 2026) |
| Views total | 648 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
115 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 32.2% | |
| 😍 | 23 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 14.8% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 13.9% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 11.3% | |
| 👌 | 9 | 7.83% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ye lijiye, Bank Nifty ka pichle 1 mahine (Feb - Mar 2026) ka chart. Chart mein aap dekh sakte hain ki pichle kuch dinon mein market mein kaafi volatility rahi hai. 6 March 2026 ko Bank Nifty 57,783.25 par close hua hai, jo ki pichle din se lagbhag 2.15% down hai. Bank Nifty Key Levels (Recent): Current Close (06-Mar-2026): 57,783.25 Recent High: 61,550.80 (18-Feb-2026) Recent Low: 57,783.25 (06-Mar-2026)
👍2❤1
GBP/JPY flattens around 210.85 as investors await the outcome of Trump’s Tuesday ultimatum. US President Trump threatens to assault Iranian infrastructure if it doesn’t reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Both the BoE and the BoJ are unlikely to reduce interest rates in the near term.
👍2🥰2😍2🔥1
Gold maintains its near-term bullish trend with support at $4,600 holding bears. Markets remain calm, awaiting the US Nonfarm Payrolls data. Trading volumes are at unusually low levels with most markets closed on Good Friday
❤2😍2👍1🥰1
The US S&P Global Services PMI in March reported that business activity in the sector is slowing sharply, falling to contractionary territory for the first time since January 2023, amid higher inflation and the war in the Middle East. The index fell from 51.7 in February to 49.8, according to S&P. They noted that, “Overall, it was the lowest index reading for over three years and consistent with a fractional contract…
🥰2❤1👍1🔥1😍1
March payrolls beat forecasts by a wide margin, boosting the US Dollar. Softer services data failed to offset the impact of strong jobs figures. Traders trimmed dovish Fed bets as Treasury yields edged higher
❤2👍2😍1
AUD/USD pares gains as strong US jobs data supports the US Dollar. Holiday-thinned liquidity keeps price action muted despite NFP upside surprise. Strong US jobs data gives the Fed room to keep interest rates unchanged for longer.
🔥2😍2❤1👍1
AUD/USD pares gains as strong US jobs data supports the US Dollar. Holiday-thinned liquidity keeps price action muted despite NFP upside surprise. Strong US jobs data gives the Fed room to keep interest rates unchanged for longer.
❤2👌1👍1🥰1😍1
USD/JPY climbed to near 159.60 on Thursday as the US Dollar strengthened on surging Oil prices and fading Fed rate cut expectations, putting the pair within striking distance of the critical 160.00 level. Japan's MOF has repeatedly warned of "decisive action" against disorderly Yen moves, and 160 is the exact level that triggered nearly $62 billion in intervention spending back in 2024. Friday's NFP report drops at 1…
🔥2❤1👍1🥰1
Commerzbank notes Bank Negara Malaysia raised its 2026 growth forecast to 4.0–5.0% on resilient domestic demand, with consumption and investment underpinned by wages, labour market strength and government support. BNM expects moderate inflation and assumes Brent at USD70–90, keeping the OPR at 2.75% for 2026.
😍3❤1🔥1
AUD/USD snaps five-day losing streak as the US Dollar softens on Middle East de-escalation hopes. Technically, AUD/USD shows early signs of stabilization, with momentum indicators beginning to turn higher. Key resistance seen at 0.6900, with a break opening the door toward 0.7000
👌2😍2❤1👍1🥰1
🧠 Trading Concept Explained 💡 Concept: Trading Patterns for Optimal Results Trading Patterns for Optimal Results involves recognizing and using recurring patterns in cryptocurrency price movements to make more informed trading decisions. By understanding these patterns, traders can predict potential price movements and optimize their entry and exit points, leading to better trading outcomes. This knowledge gives tr…
❤2👌1👍1🥰1
📈 Stay Updated Follow daily movements and trends Easy to understand updates 👉 Start now
😍3❤2👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RichardKingHub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RICHARD COLOR GAME HUB” (@RichardKingHub), 745 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RichardKingHub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.