Channel
@RichardGrenell
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,759subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001339676252 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RichardGrenell |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RichardGrenell |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 2,759 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 2,765 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 2,767 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 2,767 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
The Editor of the @latimes doesn’t know we live on the ocean and can desalinate the water. Get rid of the leaders who keep asking us to conserve more water….it’s past time to add more water. https://t.co/irclJAUySi
Which reporters were on the G7 trip? Because I didn’t see a single one report that Joe Biden embarrassed us while speaking…. https://t.co/lJvzYxclkb
Stopping giving Israel zoning advice - imagine if Canada condemned New York City’s redevelopment plans…. Mind your own business at the US border. https://t.co/YGjRvGvHjg
Hillary: Why should Russia have all the fun? China should help Democrats. https://t.co/LPUkpxj5kS
Never forget that Hillary asked China to help Democrats - and said the US media would reward them for it. https://t.co/7RDxmKKOJX
RT @TayFromCA: PSA: RON DESANTIS CANNOT HIDE FROM HIS RECORD — Ron DeSantis is flailing on the eve of his “big” day. No wonder his billionaire backers are running for the hills—and into the arms of his 2nd place competition. He just isn’t ready for the moment. https://t.co/ne7Mlv4vYR https://t.co/6mlir0QMPF
RT @LukasSpies: @realstewpeters @RichardGrenell What’s with your love affair with ric
RT @monitotaiwan: @realstewpeters @RichardGrenell You write about this topic every. single. day. One could say the obsession is all yours, Sir.
RT @BryanLeibFL: Interesting to see Wendy Sherman meet with a representative of the State of Israel as she has spent the last two years in the Biden Administration enriching & propping up the Islamic Republic of Iran. Ronen, you shouldn't have taken this meeting. https://t.co/KO03tKluGg
RT @IAPolls2022: AP/NORC Poll: President Biden Job Approval Approve — 40% Disapprove — 59% The Economy Approve — 33% Disapprove — 66% Immigration Approve — 31% Disapprove — 67% n=1,680 | 05/11-15 | D44/R37/I19 https://t.co/rennO8wLFU
RT @RichardGrenell: . @SenSherrodBrown is trying to dupe Ohio voters with an election year flip flop. “Sherrod Brown signed a 2020 letter calling Title 42 a 'CDC asylum ban' but now wants to extend it” https://t.co/kq6Ly6ykse
RT @KanekoaTheGreat: K. T. McFarland, a former Deputy National Security Advisor, says the FBI, Justice Department, and CIA will rig the 2024 U.S. presidential election, following their success in rigging 2016 and 2020, because they won't allow any candidate to win that would hold them accountable:… https://t.co/ESjic4zU5l https://t.co/30dSX700HQ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RichardGrenell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 938,042 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@RichardGrenell named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Richard Grenell” (@RichardGrenell), 2,759 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RichardGrenell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.