Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for رياض الوحي

Channel

رياض الوحي

@Riad_Elwahy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,034subscribers

-341 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001389301728
TypeChannel
Username@Riad_Elwahy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Riad_Elwahy

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,03410,37510,204.56 August 2026 — 10,375 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,371 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,365 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,361 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,357 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,350 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,346 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,345 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,339 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,333 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,329 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,326 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,322 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,321 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,315 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,311 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,302 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,298 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,295 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,293 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,288 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,285 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,281 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,278 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,272 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,265 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,259 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,250 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,229 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,214 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,206 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,201 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,191 subscribers30 September 2026 — 10,154 subscribers5 October 2026 — 10,140 subscribers10 October 2026 — 10,133 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,117 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,106 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,103 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,098 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,093 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,092 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,090 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,088 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,084 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,073 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,069 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,070 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,069 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,067 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,064 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,063 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,062 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,058 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,053 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,048 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,044 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,040 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,034 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net -341. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,983–10,426 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 23:1910,034-6
5 Nov 2026, 20:2410,040-4
4 Nov 2026, 17:5510,044-4
3 Nov 2026, 20:0010,048-5
2 Nov 2026, 18:3710,053-5
1 Nov 2026, 21:5610,058-4
31 Oct 2026, 19:4910,062-1
30 Oct 2026, 19:1910,063-1
29 Oct 2026, 22:1510,064-3
27 Oct 2026, 17:3210,067-2
26 Oct 2026, 19:2510,069-1
25 Oct 2026, 16:1510,070+1
24 Oct 2026, 13:4610,069-4
23 Oct 2026, 10:4610,073-11
22 Oct 2026, 09:5610,084-4
21 Oct 2026, 04:4110,088-2
20 Oct 2026, 05:4010,090-2
19 Oct 2026, 06:1710,092-1
18 Oct 2026, 06:0010,093-5
17 Oct 2026, 02:5510,098first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.95%
avg views ÷ 10,034 subscribers
Avg views / post
597
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held40 (10 June 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total1,791
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 21:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

506 reactions across 40 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤49998.6%
😢40.791%
👍30.593%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 506 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

27 Oct 2026, 17:28 UTC315 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026

💌 أهل القرآن إذا نزلوا بساحة الدنيا كان معهم أعظم أسباب البركة فيها، وأكبر دواعي السلوة عنها، فكلام الله يبارك لهم الموجود: (كتاب أنزلناه إليك مبارك) ويُسلِّيهم عن المفقود: (ولقد آتيناك سبعًا من المثاني والقرآن العظيم * لا تمدن عينيك إلى ما متعنا به أزواجا منهم) وفي هذا يقول الإمام أحمد: "عزيزٌ عليَّ أن تذيب الدنيا أكباد رجال وعت صدورهم القرآن!". ✒️ نهار الحارثي 📌 https://t.me/Riad_Elwahy 📌

❤9

20 Oct 2026, 10:54 UTC588 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026

💌 اغرسوا القرآن في صدور أبنائكم؛ فما أعظم أن تكون الحروف التي علَّمتموهم إياها في الدنيا، سببًا في أن تُتوَّج رؤوسكم بتاج الكرامة في الآخرة؛ يوم تفنى تيجان الملوك، ويبقى تاجُ القرآن نورًا لا يزول، وشرفًا لا يحول! ✒️ أ.د. أحمد عيسى المعصراوي 📌 https://t.me/Riad_Elwahy 📌

❤13

8 Oct 2026, 13:44 UTC888 views16 reactionsread 6 November 2026

💌 ﴿ مَن جَاۤءَ بِٱلۡحَسَنَةِ فَلَهُۥ عَشۡرُ أَمۡثَالِهَاۖ وَمَن جَاۤءَ بِٱلسَّیِّئَةِ فَلَا یُجۡزَىٰۤ إِلَّا مِثۡلَهَا وَهُمۡ لَا یُظۡلَمُونَ ﴾. لو أنك تأتي كل يوم بخمسين سيئة وعشر حسنات مثلها فقط فبعد ١٠ سنين تكون حسناتك زائدة على سيئاتك ب ١٧٧ ألف حسنة فلا تقنط ولا تعجز وزاحم سيئاتك بكثرة الحسنات. وَلَايَهْلِكُ عَلَى اللهِ تَعَالَى إِلَّا هَالِكٌ. ✒️ د. عبدالله بلقاسم 📌 https://t.me/Riad_Elwahy 📌

❤16

5 Oct 2026, 16:54 UTC≈1,030 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026

فلاح الدارين = لزوم القرآن.

❤18

3 Oct 2026, 11:01 UTC≈1,070 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026

💌 هنيئًا لمن لم يأخذهُم ضجيج برامج التواصل بعيدًا عن لذّة العيش مع القرآن.. عرفوا طريق نجاتِهم ومغنمهم جيدًا، ثم ثبتوا عليه. ✒️ عبدالعزيز الشثري 📌 https://t.me/Riad_Elwahy 📌

❤10

28 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC≈1,220 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026

💌 صادِقِ المصحفَ قبل أن تُطالِبَه بالعطاء؛ فإن أطلتَ الجلوسَ بين يديه لانَ لك، وإن داومتَ على طرقِ بابه فُتِح لك. ابدأ بما تُطيق، ولا تَزِن رحلتك بعدد الصفحات، بل بثبات الخُطى؛ فالثابت يصل وإن تأخّر، والمتعجّل ينقطع وإن أسرع. وستعلم أن دقائق الصبر مع القرآن تُنبت في القلب يقينًا، وتُساق بعدها الخيرات سوقًا لم تكن تتخيّله. أوّل الطريق تعب، وآخره كرامة. ✒️ د. عبدالله هاشم المحلاوي 📌 https://t.me/Riad_Elwahy 📌

❤11

27 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,060 views27 reactionsread 6 November 2026

💌 ستحفظ القرآن ـ بفضل الله ـ وستتلو الطوال غيبًا، وستسرد الأجزاء في جلسةٍ واحدة، وستتلو من الفاتحة إلى المائدة في ليلةٍ واحدة، بعدما شقّت عليك قراءة جزءٍ واحدٍ في اليوم! وستتبيّن لك المتشابهات، وستجد لذّةً في تلاوتها وضبطها، وسيفتح الله لك فتحًا. فقط رابط ولا تعجل، وقل: يا رب! ✒️ تسنيم هاشم المحلاوي 📌 https://t.me/Riad_Elwahy 📌

❤27

26 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC≈1,000 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026

💌 رَقِّق قلبك بالقرآن! فإنَّ القلبَ تَغْلُظُه الغفلة، وتُقسِّيه الدنيا، ولا يَجلو صدأَه مثلُ كلام الله. أطِلْ مكثَك مع القرآن؛ تلاوةً وتدبّرًا وعملاً، فإنَّ الآيات إذا لامست قلبًا صادقًا أحيت فيه ما أماتته الغفلة. لا تجعل القرآن على لسانك فحسب؛ اجعله في قلبك، ترَ أثره في سلوكك وحياتك. ✒️ حمّاد العروان 📌 https://t.me/Riad_Elwahy 📌

❤4

24 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC≈1,050 views17 reactionsread 6 November 2026

💌 حتى إذا حفِظتَ القرآن ووعيتَ ما فيه، فلا تنظر لنفسك بعين الاكتمال، بل انظر بعينِ الخشية: هل رضِي اللهُ عن هذا الحفظ؟ وهل سكنت الآياتُ في الجوارح كما سكنت في اللسان؟ القرآن ليس مجرّد حروفٍ تُرتَّل، هو ميثاقٌ بينك وبين الله، كلُّ آيةٍ فيه عَهْد، وكلُّ سورةٍ باب، وأنت السائر إليه بكلماته، فهل كنت أمينًا على الطريق؟ فطُوبى لمن جعل الحفظَ سُلّمًا للتقوى، والتلاوةَ وسيلةً للأنس، وطوبى لمن بكى عند آيةٍ فغسلت قلبه، وقرأ وع…

❤16👍1

23 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC921 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026

💌 إذا سمعت آية من كتاب الله فاسأل الله -عز وجل- أن يشرح صدرك لها وبها ، فقد سمعها قوم من قبلك وما وعتها قلوبهم، وقرأها غيرهم وما تجاوزت حناجرهم . ✒️ د. عبدالملك القاسم 📌 https://t.me/Riad_Elwahy 📌

❤12

22 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC940 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026

💌 ﴿وَكَفَى بِنَا حَاسِبِينَ﴾. تستقيم بها رحلة المؤمن إلى الله على جناحي الخوف والرجاء؛ يخاف العليم الذي تبدو لعلمه السرائر، وتستوي لديه النجوى والعلانية، ويرجو الرحيم الذي يعلم وهنه، ويرحم انكساره، وتسع رحمته ضعفه وتقصيره؛ فإحاطة العلم تورث الوجل، وسعة الرحمة تورث الأمل. ✒️ أ.د. خالد أبا الخيل 📌 https://t.me/Riad_Elwahy 📌

❤8

21 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC998 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026

💌 ضعوا أبناءكم في طريقِ القرآن 🌧️ 🌱 من أجلِّ ما يصنعه الأبُ لولده أن يأخذ بيده في أولِ الطريقِ، فيضعه في رحابِ القرآنِ؛ فإن الصغيرَ إذا نشأ والقرآنُ صاحبُه، والمسجدُ مألفُه، وحلقةُ التحفيظِ مجلسُه، والصالحونَ رفقتُه، فقد هيَّأ له أبوه من أسبابِ الهدايةِ ما لا تهيئه الأموالُ، ولا تصنعه المدارسُ، ولا تعوِّضه هدايا الدنيا كلُّها. إنك قد تعطي ولدَك مالًا فيفنى، وبيتًا فيَبلى، وشهادةً تنفعه في دنياه؛ ولكنك لن تعطيه عطاء…

❤8

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @Riad_Elwahy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“رياض الوحي” (@Riad_Elwahy), 10,034 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Riad_Elwahy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.