Channel
@RezaEjtehadi
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,256subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001085416541 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RezaEjtehadi |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RezaEjtehadi |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
5,940 average views per post against 5,256 subscribers — an engagement rate of 112.9%. Across the 12,155 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 5.73% and 23.7%, with a median of 12.3%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 8 of 8 published in the window (0 exact, 8 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 47,490 |
| Mature posts only | 112.9% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 5,256 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:fas · 12,155 channels · p10 2.57% · p25 5.73% · p50 12.3% · p75 23.7% · p90 40.5% |
| Position in cohort | 99.013th percentile · 9.2× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.058% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Persian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 5,256 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 5,257 | +15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 5,242 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 5,242 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (17 February 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 47,490 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🔹 امین الدوله چرا در گفتار و نوشتار به جای استفاده از عبارت غربی و نامانوس «تراستی» از معادلهای فارسی و زیبای آن مانند «امین»، «امانتدار» یا «مورد اعتماد» استفاده نمیشود. اینجوری عمق فاجعه بهتر درک میشود. حتی عبارت قجری «امین الدوله» هم بهتر از واژه فرنگی «تراستی» است. شاید دکتر حدادعادل پیشنهاد بهتری هم داشته باشد.
Signed Reza Ejtehadi
🔹 شریعتی خوانی با فیزیکدانان اگر در صحبتم ادعا کنم پنج بار قله دماوند را صعود کردهام و بعد بفهمید من فقط یک بار موفق به صعود شدهام، اسم این کار را چی میگذارید؟ اگر متوجه شوید که همان یک بار را هم در کارنامه ندارم، اسمش را چی میگذارید؟ حالا اگر بفهمید من اصلا تو عمرم تا دامنهی کوه دماوند هم نرفتهام و اصلا اهل کوه و کوه نوردی نیستم و با این حالی چنین ادعایی دارم اسمش را چی میگذارید؟ اگر در صحبتهایم به دفعات و…
Signed Reza Ejtehadi
باز خوانی علی شریعتی بعد از نیم قرن
Signed Reza Ejtehadi
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Reza Ejtehadi
🔹 و آنکه میخنداند ...... به نظر من یکی از درخشانترین بازیهای اکبر عبدی در فیلم «هنرپیشه» ساختهی محسن مخملباف است. فیلمی که در ابتدای آن این جمله بر پرده: «آن که میگرید، یک درد دارد، و آن که میخندد، هزار و یک درد،» جای خود را به گریه های اکبر عبدی میدهد. یادش گرامیباد. https://t.me/RezaEjtehadi
Signed Reza Ejtehadi
🔹 لازم بود که عادل فیلتر شود! یک برنامه موفق بر اساس تواناییهای شخصی عادل فردوسیپور و هیجان یک بازی پرطرفدار و پرحاشیه، به پر مخاطبترین برنامه رسانه تبدیل میشود و جور بخشی از ناتواناییهای رسانه در برقراری ارتباط با بینندگانش را میکشد، ولی در نهایت با مدیریت یک مدیر تازهوارد به مرگ محکوم میشود. مجری با توجه به توانایی و ذکاوت خود یک بستر اینترنتی خصوصی ترتیب میدهد و مخاطبهای آن بزودی از رسانه ملی بیشتر میش…
Signed Reza Ejtehadi
🔹 وقتی احمقهای بیشعور بر سر سفره نشستهاند در مجموعهای از آزمایشهای رفتارشناسی و درک هوش حیوانات، یک حیوان که میتواند موش، دلفین یا پرنده ای باشد، در قفسی نگهداری میشود و باید برای رسیدن به پاداش، کاری را که آزمایشگر میخواهد انجام دهد. مثلا باید دستگیره ای را فشار دهد تا دریچهای باز شود و کمی غذا دریافت کند، و برای غذای بیشتر این کار را تکرار کند. حیوانات با هوش دیر یا زود میآموزند که چگونه به غذا برسند. شکل …
Signed Reza Ejtehadi
همینگونه بدستم رسید، نمیدانم متن از کیست یا تصویر کار کیست. اگر میدانستم حتما قدردانی میکردم.
Signed Reza Ejtehadi
🔹 شورای عالی دربانها در جلوی یک در دربانی ایستاده است. مهم نیست که پشت این در چیست و این چه مکانی است. هر چه باشد، اگر نزدیک شوید و از دربان بپرسید که آیا میتوانید از در بگذرید، حتما پاسخ "خیر" است. او را آنجا گذاشتهاند که از ورود بعضیها جلوگیری کند. اگر با اعتماد بنفس سلامی ندهید و رد نشوید، اگر خودتان شک دارید که اجازه ورود دارید، این بهترین زمان است که او نشان دهد که بی دلیل اینجا نایستاده است. الان زمان قدرت …
Signed Reza Ejtehadi
🔹 قدرتمندانِ ناتوان صبح از خواب بیدار میشوید، روند معمول یک روز دیگر از زندگی را شروع میکنید. بعد از دستشویی و احتمالا یک دوش صبحگاهی میروید چای را آماده میکنید و در یخچال را برای صبحانه باز میکنید. نیازی به تفکر نیست، همان صبحانهی همیشگی. وای به آن روزی که یکی از اجزای صبحانه تمام شده باشد و فراموش کرده باشید تهیه کنید. چه فاجعه ای بزرگتر از این؟ هر چه سنتان بالا تر میرود به رویه های روزمره وابسته تر میشو…
Signed Reza Ejtehadi
🔹نمیتوانند، چون انسانند یک نظریه تکاملی میگه اهلی شدن و نزدیک شدن به انسان توانایی ژنتیکی حیوان است نه انسان. یک توانایی که مزیت نسبی در مقابل گونه وحشی میدهد. در آلمان اکنون میلیونها سگ زندگی میکنند ولی حتی یک قلاده گرگ در کل کشور وجود ندارد. یک مزیت نسبی که با مقدار توانایی نزدیکی به انسانها متناسب است. مثلاً کلاغ حیوان خانگی نیست، ولی کلاغها میتوانند در نزدیکی انسان زندگی کنند و با او حتی هم سفره شوند. جمعیت…
Signed Reza Ejtehadi
🔹 اصلاح نشوی، خواهی شکست فلزها چکش خوارند. یعنی با ضربات چکش میشود آنها را تغییر شکل داد. با هر ضربه تغییری اندک و در نهایت متناسب با نیاز و کاربرد شکل میگیرند. ولی شیشه ها یا سرامیک ها تغییر شکل را تحمل نمیکنند. در برابر ضربه ها مقاومت میکنند و اگر ضربه سنگین باشد میشکنند. آهن چکش خوار با اضافه شدن کمی ناخالصی به چدن خشک تبدیل میشود. چدنی که برای تغییر شکل راهی به جز شکستن و یا ذوب کردنش وجود ندارد. چون تحمل…
Signed Reza Ejtehadi
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @RezaEjtehadi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 285,384 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رضا اجتهادی” (@RezaEjtehadi), 5,256 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RezaEjtehadi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.