Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Letters Of The Past

Channel

Letters Of The Past

@RevvedEmotions

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

134subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001948997070
TypeChannel
Username@RevvedEmotions
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RevvedEmotions

Growth

134139136.57 August 2026 — 139 subscribers8 August 2026 — 138 subscribers8 August 2026 — 138 subscribers16 August 2026 — 137 subscribers25 August 2026 — 134 subscribers7 August 202625 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 17 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 133–140 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 00:09134-3
16 Aug 2026, 19:37137-1
8 Aug 2026, 23:00138no change
8 Aug 2026, 14:01138-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:34139first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.3%
avg views ÷ 134 subscribers
Avg views / post
52.7
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (1 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total948
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘861.5%
🔥215.4%
🫡215.4%
😭17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC24 viewsread 8 August 2026

جدیدا با یکی دوست شدم که صداش واقعاً🙏🏼

Signed Ashkan

8 Aug 2026, 01:40 UTC36 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Death can be such a bliss sometimes.

💘1😭1

Signed Ashkan

8 Aug 2026, 01:39 UTC36 viewsread 8 August 2026

Day's already ruined before it even got started

Signed Ashkan

8 Aug 2026, 01:38 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Boy, I sure hope nothing pisses me off and fucks me sideways today.

💘1

Signed Ashkan

6 Aug 2026, 01:38 UTC44 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

بعضی‌وقتا یاد این میوفتم که اولین‌باری که هم رو کنار عمو شهرام دیدیم من به سه‌ شخص رندوم گفتم که اون‌ سه‌تا ارمنی کسخلی که قرار بود بیان کجان و سه‌تاتون جواب دادید که اونا ماییم و من اونجا بجای خجالت کشیدن قهقهه زدم و تو اولین کسی بودی که بعد من قهقهه زدی. ندانم ولی جزو معدود خاطراتیه که باعث میشه هروقت اسمت جاهای مختلف میاد بجای ناراحت شدن بتونم خودم رو مجبور کنم بخندم و عجیبه که بعد اینهمه مدت هنوزم همه‌چیز انقدر د

💘6

Signed Ashkan

3 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC60 viewsread 8 August 2026

دنیای سیالات چیزیه که علاقه‌ی زیادی بهش ندارم اما همیشه تحسینش کردم، دلیلش هم همینه‌که بالاتر گفتم بهتون، خیلی بیشتر از اینکه پایه‌ی ریاضیات و منطقی درش باشه خیلی بیشتر وابسته به تجربه و شبیه‌سازی و مدل‌سازیه، ولی خب فکر کنید همین مقدار کم ریاضیات و منطق دخیل درش باعث شده الان ما بتونیم هواپیما بسازیم و یا حتی بریم فضا باهاش و برگردیم و خب وقتی بهش فکر می‌کنم واقعا جز تحسین نمی‌تونم کار دیگه‌ای انجام بدم.

Signed Ashkan

3 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC62 viewsread 8 August 2026

چاره چیه؟ یک حالت قربانی کردن چیزی برای بدست آوردن یچیز دیگه. شما دارید ماشین خونواده طراحی می‌کنید نه مسابقه. درنتیجه اونقدر داون‌فورس عجیب‌غریبی نمی‌خواید. میخواید نهایتاً ماشینتون تو ساعت ۱۷۰تا به اندازه‌ای پایدار باشه که کنترلش از دست راننده خارج نشه و تو سرعت ۱۲۰ هم بتونه بتونه بپیچه به نحوی که چپ نکنه. پس میاید جریان هوای زیر و روی ماشین رو طوری تعبیه می‌کنید که به این قضیه برسید. این قطعه زه رکاب هوای زیر ماشی

Signed Ashkan

3 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC51 viewsread 8 August 2026

چطور می‌تونیم به این نیروی داون‌فورس برسیم؟ خب مقدار زیادیش تجربیه و منطق ریاضی درست حسابی‌ای پشتش نیست اونقدر. میتونید یه بال عقب بزرگ بذارید پشت ماشین مثل این ماشین مسابقه‌ها و یه لبه بزرگ هم بذارید جلوی سپر و مقدار زیادی داون‌فورس بگیرید اما بعد به مشکل بعدی برمیخورید. شما هرچقدر نیروی داون‌فورس رو زیاد کنید به همون مقدار و بیشتر هم به ماشینتون نیروی Drag یا نیروی پسا و مقاومت‌هوا اضافه می‌کنید. که خب واقعاً غیرای

Signed Ashkan

3 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC59 viewsread 8 August 2026

اگر به سر و ته این زه رکاب نگاه کنید می‌بینید که مربعی شکل نیستن و شکل خاصی داره. دلیلش چیه؟ بالاتر بهتون گفتم که نحوه قرارگیری مرکز گرانش این ماشین‌ها باعث میشه بصورت کلی ناپایدر باشن در سرعت‌های زیاد. برای مقابله با این قضیه باید به همون نیروها و اصل‌هایی برگردیم که باعث میشن هواپیما‌ها پرواز کنن و روی آسمون بمونن. نیروی Lift یا نیروی بالابر بە اصطلاح. اما خب ماشین داره الردی تلاش می‌کنه پرواز کنه و هوا هم داره کمک

Signed Ashkan

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @RevvedEmotions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Letters Of The Past” (@RevvedEmotions), 134 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RevvedEmotions.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.