22 Sept 2025, 11:37 UTC7 viewsread 14 August 2026
был не сильно большой приход, но всё равно неплохо, буду брать ещё!!
Channel
Отзывы прайса
@Reviewsscreenseiro
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002670585097 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Reviewsscreenseiro |
| Created | 29 July 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Reviewsscreenseiro |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 29 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
21 Sept 2025, 13:04 UTC7 viewsread 14 August 2026
Выиграла оп в пиар чате у @screenfrseiro, приход хороший и очень нравится то, что есть возможность выиграть это в приз на таком прекрасном канале!
21 Sept 2025, 10:13 UTC7 viewsread 14 August 2026
Большое спасибо. Приход в пч 40+ человек. Обязательно обращусь за пиаром ещё раз🙏🏻
14 Sept 2025, 10:49 UTC10 viewsread 14 August 2026
большое спасибо, 100 пм быстро добили, есть небольшой приход! 🫶🏻
14 Sept 2025, 08:36 UTC10 viewsread 14 August 2026
Спасибо большое, выиграла в конкурсе пиар 2 часа. Приход был Спасибо большое ещё раз💋
29 Aug 2025, 05:53 UTC15 viewsread 14 August 2026
Здравствуйте! Спасибо, за ваши розыгрыши! Призы достойные и все выдали вовремя! Буду участвовать ещё.
28 Aug 2025, 16:58 UTC15 viewsread 14 August 2026
Брала ОП в этом чате: @prchatseiroh Очень хороший! Все прошло быстро и идеально! За 6ч ришло +-30-40 людей, что очень радует! А ещё радует, что большинство актив) Думаю буду брать ещё
28 Aug 2025, 13:10 UTC14 viewsread 14 August 2026
Здравствуйте!! Большое спасибо за просмотры и конкурс! Просмотры набрались быстро, за что отдельная благодарность. Буду чаще участвовать в подобных конкурсах!
28 Aug 2025, 12:43 UTC15 viewsread 14 August 2026
Спасибо вам большое за пиар и за такой великолепный конкурс! 🤩🐸 Я всегда участвую в таких вот конкурсах/розыгрышах, вдруг, повезёт. И мне как раз вот повезло☺️, я рада очень.🍪
27 Aug 2025, 17:26 UTC11 viewsread 14 August 2026
Здравствуйте. Большое спасибо! Всё быстро и недорого :)
26 Aug 2025, 17:10 UTC12 viewsread 14 August 2026
был взят бот на подписку на 12 часов
26 Aug 2025, 17:09 UTC11 viewsread 14 August 2026
купила бота на подписку, хороший привод, спасибо
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Reviewsscreenseiro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,216,945 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Отзывы прайса” (@Reviewsscreenseiro), 3 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Reviewsscreenseiro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.