5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,249–3,260 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 21:13
3,250
-6
11 Aug 2026, 06:31
3,256
-2
8 Aug 2026, 02:07
3,258
-1
7 Aug 2026, 20:02
3,259
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:58
3,259
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.01%
avg views ÷ 3,250 subscribers
Avg views / post
97.9
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
9 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
881
Reactions total
8
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4
50.0%
🙏
3
37.5%
❤
1
12.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
‼️Agosto ya ha comenzado y aún no hemos conseguido cubrir todos los gastos de este nuevo mes. Sabemos que son fechas de vacaciones y entendemos que no siempre es fácil colaborar, pero la lucha por la libertad del juez Presencia no puede detenerse.
Aunque ha sido absuelto, continúa en prisión mientras su equipo de abogados trabaja para que se haga justicia. Mientras tanto, nosotros debemos cumplir un mes más el compr…
🔴El juez Presencia denuncia al Tribunal Supremo español ante la Comisión Europea por la sentencia de los migrantes nadadores, “porque llega a una conclusión absurda y contraria al derecho internacional que además ha provocado una catástrofe humanitaria en Ceuta”.
Para firmar esa sentencia, el CGPJ habilitó al magistrado Lucas Murillo de la Cueva que se había jubilado en mayo y que hasta ese momento era el presidente…
Mientras otros cuentan con el apoyo de grandes intereses, nosotros solo contamos con la fuerza de la gente. Cada pequeña aportación mantiene viva esta causa. No esperes a que lo hagan otros: el pueblo solo puede salvarse con el pueblo.
‼️Ya solo faltan 1.250 € para alcanzar el reto de agosto. ¡Entre todos lo conseguimos!‼️
Mañana sin falta queremos darle al juez Presencia la buena noticia que le devuelva un poco de paz: que los gastos de agosto, que tiene dentro y fuera de prisión, ya están cubiertos.
Cada donación, por pequeña que sea, le quita una preocupación y le permite seguir centrado en lo único que importa: recuperar su libertad.
No deje…
🔴Juez Presencia: “La sentencia del Supremo sobre los migrantes nadadores es una ‘cagada’; llega a una conclusión absurda y contraria al Derecho internacional que además ha provocado una catástrofe humanitaria en Ceuta”.
Para firmar esa sentencia, el CGPJ habilitó al magistrado Lucas Murillo de la Cueva que se había jubilado en mayo y que hasta ese momento era el presidente de la Sala de lo Contencioso del Alto Tribu…
‼️Entre todos, estamos a un paso de alcanzar el objetivo de agosto‼️
Queremos darle al juez Presencia la buena noticia de que ya están cubiertos los gastos de los primeros 15 días de agosto.
Nos gustaría darle pronto esta buena noticia, y que durante estas dos primeras semanas, puede estar tranquilo. Sería un enorme alivio para él y le quitaríamos una preocupación muy importante de encima, permitiéndole seguir cent…
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @ResistenciaActivada. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,336,504 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ResistenciaActivada named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@albertop1328 named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⭕️Resistencia Activada❌” (@ResistenciaActivada), 3,250 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ResistenciaActivada.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
