Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ResRef | المرجع البحثي

Channel

ResRef | المرجع البحثي

@ResRefcom

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

4,505subscribers

+222 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002348978842
TypeChannel
Username@ResRefcom
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ResRefcom

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,2814,5054,3937 August 2026 — 4,283 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,284 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,281 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,298 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,312 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,324 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,329 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,332 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,337 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,341 subscribers7 September 2026 — 4,335 subscribers11 September 2026 — 4,364 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,409 subscribers28 September 2026 — 4,487 subscribers5 October 2026 — 4,505 subscribers7 August 20265 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 59 days, net +222. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,247–4,539 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 20:204,505+18
28 Sept 2026, 08:384,487+78
15 Sept 2026, 16:394,409+45
11 Sept 2026, 15:404,364+29
7 Sept 2026, 08:374,335-6
2 Sept 2026, 08:524,341+4
30 Aug 2026, 04:044,337+5
26 Aug 2026, 21:534,332+3
24 Aug 2026, 04:164,329+5
20 Aug 2026, 15:424,324+12
17 Aug 2026, 20:564,312+14
14 Aug 2026, 16:334,298+17
11 Aug 2026, 04:314,281-3
7 Aug 2026, 23:234,284+1
7 Aug 2026, 15:474,283first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4686.8%
🥰47.55%
👍11.89%
🔥11.89%
😁11.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC207 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ResRef_CommunityPhoto

📍كيف بدنا تكون الكوميونيتي؟ هدفنا إنو هالمكان ما يكون مجرد غروب لنشر الروابط، وإنما مساحة للطلاب والباحثين يتعلموا، يناقشوا أفكارهم، يلاقوا فرصاً ويساعدوا بعض بمسيرتهم البحثية .. ⚜ ولأن طلبات المشاركة بالدراسات ممكن #تضيع بين الرسائل، رح نبدأ بتنظيمها .. علماً أنه الفرص البحثية مرحب بها من #كل_الدول ✅ تفاصيل القواعد الجديدة 👇🏻

❤8

6 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC291 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎓 أكبر وهم أكاديمي ممكن يتعبك؟ إنك لازم تفهم كل شي من أول مرة. كم مرة قرأت موضوع وما استوعبته بالكامل، وبلشت تشك بنفسك؟🤔 وكم مرة شفت حدا حواليك مبين إنه فهم كل شي بسرعة، فحسّيت إنك متأخر عنه؟ الحقيقة إنه سرعة الفهم مو هي المعيار الحقيقي❗️ 📍في مفاهيم بتحتاج تقراها مرتين .. وفي أفكار ما بتتوضح إلا بعد النقاش والسؤال والتجربة .. وفي أشياء بتستوعبها اليوم بشكل بسيط، بعد ما كانت معقدة جدًا قبل فترة .. 📚 إعادة القراء…

❤4

5 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC335 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

للباحث اللي كل ما قال "هانت" بتطلعله عقبة جديدة 📑 أحياناً بتمشي بكل حماس لتبلش بحثك .. بس الواقع بكون ناطرك بمفاجآت ما خطرت على بالك أبداً 🤕 لهيك #تذكر إنه كل عقبة عم تواجهك اليوم اليوم هي #خبرة عم تنضاف لاسمك بالمستقبل ✨ طريق العلم بدو نَفَس طويل .. وصدر رحب ليتحمل كل المفاجآت اللي بتطلع خلال الرحلة خليك قد #التحدي وكمل المشوار 💫 #ResRef

❤4👍1😁1

4 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC379 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🧠 أحياناً .. المشكلة مو إنك ما بتعرف .. المشكلة إنك ما بتعرف إذا يلي عم تعملو صح. وهي أكتر نقطة بتخلّي كتير من الباحثين يضيعوا وقتهم .. يعيدوا خطوات .. أو يكتشفوا أخطاء كان ممكن يتجنبوها من البداية . 📌 لهيك بفريق ResRef منقدّم #استشارات_بحثية_مجانية 🤝 سواء كنت محتار باختيار فكرة البحث .. أو بصياغة السؤال البحثي .. أو بتصميم الدراسة .. أو بأي مرحلة من رحلتك البحثية .. نحن موجودين حتى نوجّهك للطريق الصحيح، ونساعدك ت…

❤6

3 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC453 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ResRef_CommunityPoll

دراسة Cross-sectional وجدت علاقة بين قلة النوم وانخفاض العلامات. هل فينا نستنتج إنو قلة النوم هي السبب المباشر؟

  1. نعم14%
  2. لا86%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC360 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ResRef_CommunityPoll

منبدأ بأشخاص عندهم مرض معين، ومنقارن تعرضاتهم السابقة مع أشخاص ما عندهم المرض. شو التصميم؟

  1. Cross-sectional2%
  2. Case-control66%
  3. Cohort17%
  4. RCT15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC323 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ResRef_CommunityPoll

منتابع مجموعة مدخنين ومجموعة غير مدخنين لعدة سنوات، ومنقارن حدوث مرض رئوي بينهم. شو التصميم الأقرب؟

  1. Cross-sectional4%
  2. Case-control28%
  3. Cohort55%
  4. RCT12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC408 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ResRef_CommunityPoll

منوزع المشاركين عشوائياً بين علاج جديد وعلاج تقليدي، وبنقارن النتائج. شو التصميم؟

  1. Cross-sectional8%
  2. Case-control4%
  3. Cohort4%
  4. RCT83%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC338 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ResRef_CommunityPoll

بدنا نعرف نسبة القلق بين طلاب الطب خلال فترة الامتحانات، ومنجمع المعلومات منهم مرة واحدة. شو التصميم الأقرب؟

  1. Cross-sectional83%
  2. Cohort8%
  3. Case-control3%
  4. Clinical Trial6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC334 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

فقرة #الكويزات رجعت من جديد ❤️‍🔥 أسئلة بسيطة بتختبر معوماتك بالبحث العلمي 🫡 لا تفوتوا التحدي❗️ اختبر معرفتك البحثية مع ريسريف! 🔍📊 #ResRef #ResRef_Community

❤2

2 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC444 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

باليوم الرابع عشر من سلسلة #٣٠_معلومة_بـ٣٠_يوم 🚀 عم نلخص 5 خطوات بسيطة لتصمم Google Form محترم واحترافي ⚡️💡 كمّل الفيديو لتعرف كيف ترتب أسئلتك وتضمن موافقة المشاركين بذكاء 👌🏻 💭 وخبرنا بالكومنت: شو أكتر مشكلة بتواجهك لما تجمع ردود على استبيانك؟ #ResRef #medical

❤5

1 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC520 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 في باحثين بيخسروا نقاط مهمة من عنوان البحث وحده! تخيل إنك تقرأ العنوان التالي: "الرضا الوظيفي لدى موظفي القطاع الصحي" للوهلة الأولى مبين عنوان جيد .. **لكن لحظة 🤔 وين المتغير الثاني؟** يعني عرفنا أن الدراسة بتتحدث عن #الرضا_الوظيفي .. لكن شو هو العامل اللي بيأثر عليه؟ وشو العلاقة اللي بيسعى الباحث يدرسها؟ هون بيوقع كثير من الباحثين بفخ "وين المتغيرات؟" 🔍 العنوان السابق بيحتوي متغير واحد فقط، بينما العنوان ال…

❤4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ResRefcom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTCAnonymous Quiz102 voters

بدنا نعرف نسبة القلق بين طلاب الطب خلال فترة الامتحانات، ومنجمع المعلومات منهم مرة واحدة. شو التصميم الأقرب؟

  1. Cross-sectional83%
  2. Cohort8%
  3. Case-control3%
  4. Clinical Trial6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTCAnonymous Quiz92 voters

منتابع مجموعة مدخنين ومجموعة غير مدخنين لعدة سنوات، ومنقارن حدوث مرض رئوي بينهم. شو التصميم الأقرب؟

  1. Cross-sectional4%
  2. Case-control28%
  3. Cohort55%
  4. RCT12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTCAnonymous Quiz88 voters

منبدأ بأشخاص عندهم مرض معين، ومنقارن تعرضاتهم السابقة مع أشخاص ما عندهم المرض. شو التصميم؟

  1. Cross-sectional2%
  2. Case-control66%
  3. Cohort17%
  4. RCT15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTCAnonymous Quiz89 voters

منوزع المشاركين عشوائياً بين علاج جديد وعلاج تقليدي، وبنقارن النتائج. شو التصميم؟

  1. Cross-sectional8%
  2. Case-control4%
  3. Cohort4%
  4. RCT83%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTCAnonymous Quiz117 voters

دراسة Cross-sectional وجدت علاقة بين قلة النوم وانخفاض العلامات. هل فينا نستنتج إنو قلة النوم هي السبب المباشر؟

  1. نعم14%
  2. لا86%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ResRef | المرجع البحثي” (@ResRefcom), 4,505 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ResRefcom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.