Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Digital Reputation 👑

@ReputationGlobal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

90subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004492552116
TypeChannel
Username@ReputationGlobal
DescriptionHelping individuals, public figures, creators, and businesses protect their online reputation through professional content removal and search engine deindexing. 📩 @cirrea
Created1 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ReputationGlobal

Growth

908 Aug 2026, 04:30 — 90 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 14:31 — 90 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:309 Aug 2026, 14:31
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 89–91 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 14:3190no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:3090first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

2 Jul 2026, 19:12 UTC348 viewsread 9 August 2026

Refer to the solutions above and contact me via DM with your reputation management or content removal request. Founder: t.me/cirrea

2 Jul 2026, 03:26 UTC674 viewsread 9 August 2026

🌐 Search Engine Deindexing News Articles, Blogs & Forums Deindex eligible news articles, blogs, forum threads, and other webpages from Google Search. • From $1,400+ • 3–17 Days 🖥 Google Article Deindexing Professional deindexing for eligible Google-indexed articles. • $2,190+ • 3–9 Days 🤴 Bing Deindexing Remove eligible content from Bing Search. • $1,050+ • 3–9 Days ❤️ Yandex Deindexing Remove eligible content f

1 Jul 2026, 03:34 UTC485 viewsread 9 August 2026

💎 Welcome to @OfficialCoverage. Protect your online reputation with our premium Content Removal & Deindexing services. We assist individuals, public figures, creators, and businesses with eligible content removal and search engine deindexing across major platforms worldwide. Whether you’re dealing with negative news, articles, reviews, Reddit posts, social media content, images, videos, or other search results, we

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @ReputationGlobal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 785,551 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Digital Reputation 👑” (@ReputationGlobal), 90 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ReputationGlobal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.