RT @kristina_wong: Exclusive: @RepMattGaetz Asks Austin and Milley Why Drag Shows Are Still Happening on Bases https://t.co/O1yz3kvP05 via @BreitbartNews

Channel
Rep. Matt Gaetz
@RepMattGaetz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,965subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001285343303 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RepMattGaetz |
| Created | 29 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RepMattGaetz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 2,965 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 2,972 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:20 | 2,983 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 2,985 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 2,985 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
I don’t believe June 1st is the real deadline for default. Why aren’t we making @SecYellen show her work before Congress? She couldn’t even see inflation coming from a mile away! https://t.co/ZwRJjDhHHI
RT @townhallcom: .@mattgaetz: "I don't believe that the first of the month is a real deadline. Like, I don't understand why we're not making Janet Yellen show her work!" https://t.co/6QgmystbNO
RT @DailyCaller: .@RepMattGaetz: “If Republicans are serious about the border, we should impeach Mayorkas immediately.” https://t.co/djDfCYmZr8
RT @kimguilfoyle: “So especially now, it’s a sad reality to see what the FBI has become.” FBI whistleblower Garret O’Boyle reveals the corruption he uncovered and the retaliation he’s faced. You do not want to miss the full interview ⬇️ https://t.co/cc5ZUaQtt7 https://t.co/ye537e0SWk
RT @CitizenFreePres: Matt Gaetz: "The exact same FBI task forces that were set up to go after terrorists in the caves of Central Asia have been turned against Catholic Churches and parents at school board meetings." https://t.co/yRpR2wRSlF
If Republicans are serious about the border, we should impeach Secretary Mayorkas immediately. But I am ashamed to report that I do not think we have the votes right now to move that impeachment out of the House Judiciary Committee. That is WEAKNESS on the part of Republicans. https://t.co/xFtlNMD2xv
RT @mercedesschlapp: The best squad. https://t.co/XhdaFOy1gy
COMING UP: I'll be joining @ChrisPlanteShow's The Right Squad for the full hour TONIGHT with @mercedesschlapp, @drjasonnichols, and @JennPellegrino! 🔥 Tune in to @Newsmax at 9pm ET/8pm CT! https://t.co/tkG6OtXhZV
RT @kimguilfoyle: 🚨 FBI whistleblower SPEAKS OUT 'The FBI is now seeking to continue to destroy me and smear my name' Full one-on-one with whistleblower Garret O'Boyle 👉 https://t.co/cc5ZUaQtt7 https://t.co/6pe8M5VhO0
The exact same FBI task forces that were set up to go after terrorists in the caves of Central Asia have been turned against Catholic Churches and parents at school board meetings. The biggest threat is not from our fellow Americans. It is in Washington, D.C. where the rot runs… https://t.co/PosX1yUSjw https://t.co/VU8pu3dGGM
BREAKING: FBI whistleblower @realSteveFriend revealed that bureau leadership received cash incentives to inflate the number of their “domestic extremism” cases! The FBI has been targeting our fellow Americans as “extremists” in order to abuse their power. https://t.co/RLPKjwFGyH
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RepMattGaetz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,148,650 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 13
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 13
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@RepMattGaetz named 13 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rep. Matt Gaetz” (@RepMattGaetz), 2,965 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RepMattGaetz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.