Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Rep. Matt Gaetz

@RepMattGaetz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2,965subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001285343303
TypeChannel
Username@RepMattGaetz
Created29 December 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RepMattGaetz

Growth

2,9652,9852,9756 August 2026 — 2,985 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,985 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,983 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,972 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,965 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,962–2,988 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:252,965-7
9 Aug 2026, 23:322,972-11
6 Aug 2026, 23:202,983-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:032,985no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:422,985first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 May 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

23 May 2023, 17:06 UTC≈6,740 viewsread 8 August 2026

RT @kristina_wong: Exclusive: @RepMattGaetz Asks Austin and Milley Why Drag Shows Are Still Happening on Bases https://t.co/O1yz3kvP05 via @BreitbartNews

23 May 2023, 16:06 UTC≈6,170 viewsread 8 August 2026

I don’t believe June 1st is the real deadline for default. Why aren’t we making @SecYellen show her work before Congress? She couldn’t even see inflation coming from a mile away! https://t.co/ZwRJjDhHHI

23 May 2023, 15:05 UTC≈4,320 viewsread 8 August 2026

RT @townhallcom: .@mattgaetz: "I don't believe that the first of the month is a real deadline. Like, I don't understand why we're not making Janet Yellen show her work!" https://t.co/6QgmystbNO

23 May 2023, 04:05 UTC≈8,620 viewsread 8 August 2026

RT @DailyCaller: .@RepMattGaetz: “If Republicans are serious about the border, we should impeach Mayorkas immediately.” https://t.co/djDfCYmZr8

23 May 2023, 03:06 UTC≈2,110 viewsread 8 August 2026

RT @kimguilfoyle: “So especially now, it’s a sad reality to see what the FBI has become.” FBI whistleblower Garret O’Boyle reveals the corruption he uncovered and the retaliation he’s faced. You do not want to miss the full interview ⬇️ https://t.co/cc5ZUaQtt7 https://t.co/ye537e0SWk

23 May 2023, 03:06 UTC≈2,850 viewsread 8 August 2026

RT @CitizenFreePres: Matt Gaetz: "The exact same FBI task forces that were set up to go after terrorists in the caves of Central Asia have been turned against Catholic Churches and parents at school board meetings." https://t.co/yRpR2wRSlF

23 May 2023, 03:06 UTC≈1,670 viewsread 8 August 2026

If Republicans are serious about the border, we should impeach Secretary Mayorkas immediately. But I am ashamed to report that I do not think we have the votes right now to move that impeachment out of the House Judiciary Committee. That is WEAKNESS on the part of Republicans. https://t.co/xFtlNMD2xv

23 May 2023, 02:05 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 8 August 2026

RT @mercedesschlapp: The best squad. https://t.co/XhdaFOy1gy

23 May 2023, 01:05 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 8 August 2026

COMING UP: I'll be joining @ChrisPlanteShow's The Right Squad for the full hour TONIGHT with @mercedesschlapp, @drjasonnichols, and @JennPellegrino! 🔥 Tune in to @Newsmax at 9pm ET/8pm CT! https://t.co/tkG6OtXhZV

23 May 2023, 00:05 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 8 August 2026

RT @kimguilfoyle: 🚨 FBI whistleblower SPEAKS OUT 'The FBI is now seeking to continue to destroy me and smear my name' Full one-on-one with whistleblower Garret O'Boyle 👉 https://t.co/cc5ZUaQtt7 https://t.co/6pe8M5VhO0

22 May 2023, 23:06 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 8 August 2026

The exact same FBI task forces that were set up to go after terrorists in the caves of Central Asia have been turned against Catholic Churches and parents at school board meetings. The biggest threat is not from our fellow Americans. It is in Washington, D.C. where the rot runs… https://t.co/PosX1yUSjw https://t.co/VU8pu3dGGM

22 May 2023, 19:06 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 8 August 2026

BREAKING: FBI whistleblower @realSteveFriend revealed that bureau leadership received cash incentives to inflate the number of their “domestic extremism” cases! The FBI has been targeting our fellow Americans as “extremists” in order to abuse their power. https://t.co/RLPKjwFGyH

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RepMattGaetz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,148,650 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rep. Matt Gaetz” (@RepMattGaetz), 2,965 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RepMattGaetz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.