Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Renaud Camus

Channel

Renaud Camus

@RenaudCamusTelegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,867subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001329550736
TypeChannel
Username@RenaudCamusTelegram
Created29 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RenaudCamusTelegram

Growth

2,8662,8772,871.56 August 2026 — 2,877 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,877 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,871 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,868 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,869 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,866 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,868 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,867 subscribers2,8676 August 202630 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 23 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,864–2,879 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 01:162,867-1
26 Aug 2026, 18:082,868+2
23 Aug 2026, 21:052,866-3
20 Aug 2026, 15:272,869+1
17 Aug 2026, 13:582,868-3
11 Aug 2026, 00:382,871-6
6 Aug 2026, 17:162,877no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:412,877first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

594 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍23439.4%
17429.3%
🔥579.60%
👏447.41%
😁183.03%
🤔142.36%
😱111.85%
81.35%
😎81.35%
👌71.18%
🗿30.505%
😢30.505%
🎉20.337%
👀20.337%
👎20.337%
💩20.337%
🤓20.337%
🤮20.337%
10.168%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 594reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 October 2025 to 15 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Dec 2025, 17:28 UTC≈2,700 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Decolonisation, translated by the author: https://www.amazon.fr/dp/B0G6X5QZ2N

👏18👍843👀2😁2🔥1

15 Dec 2025, 17:28 UTC≈2,290 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Décolonisation : https://www.amazon.fr/dp/B0FWWXZ81V

🔥17👍3

15 Dec 2025, 17:27 UTC≈2,030 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Vous pouvez également vous procurer les derniers ouvrages de Renaud Camus (Journal 2024, Décolonisation) sur Amazon : https://www.amazon.fr/dp/B0G6WSQ1LW

👍65😱1

15 Dec 2025, 17:26 UTC≈1,880 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

[Message de service] Les tweets de Renaud Camus ne peuvent être actuellement recopiés ici, sur cette chaîne Telegram. Nous vous invitons à suivre l’auteur sur https://x.com/RenaudCamus.

😱8👍1💩1

27 Nov 2025, 16:27 UTC≈2,120 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Nouveau commentaire d’un lecteur de Décolonisation, Philippe H. (je ne suis pas d’accord avec certains points, but) : « Renaud Camus a été caricaturé, accusé de tous les maux, on lui a prêté des idées qu'il n'a jamais eues et des théories qu'il n'a jamais établies. Il s'agirait donc de le lire, pour commencer, non ? Et cet ouvrage-ci, après le précédent, La Destruction des Européens d'Europe, constitue une porte d'

👍305🔥3

23 Nov 2025, 11:10 UTC≈1,670 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍1815🔥41

23 Nov 2025, 11:10 UTC≈1,140 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

18👍9👏3😎3🗿1

23 Nov 2025, 11:10 UTC≈1,300 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

8👍6🔥3🎉1

23 Nov 2025, 11:10 UTC≈1,570 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

22👍14😎5👏4🗿2

23 Nov 2025, 11:10 UTC≈1,230 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Les Danois du Berlingske ont rendu visite à Renaud Camus pour la parution de Décolonisation. Extrait de l’article-fleuve de Solveig Gram Jensen. « Il est possible que la presse française le boude. Mais ses pensées et ses idées voyagent librement à travers les frontières du monde entier. » * * * « Renaud Camus : Nous ne devons plus considérer les immigrants comme des individus qui viennent en Europe pour trouver du

👍16🔥9👏531

17 Nov 2025, 19:00 UTC≈1,350 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Commentaire intéressant d’un lecteur de #Décolonisation sur Amazon : « Qui d’autre que Renaud Camus décrit avec autant de clarté et de lucidité la situation actuelle de nos contrées ? Qui d’autre que lui exprime avec autant de justesse et d’acuité la seule solution qui vaille à remédier à nos malheurs : la décolonisation. Renaud Camus est un prophète. Le grand remplacement pouvait apparaître comme un fantasme il y a

37👍24🔥1

16 Nov 2025, 11:29 UTC≈1,360 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

« Le #génocide remplaciste et antiraciste n’a même plus besoin de tuer, il lui suffit de remplacer (et de laisser les remplaçants tuer pour lui, de plus en plus). #Huxley avait brillamment prévu que le totalitarisme à venir serait ludique, joueur, divertissant, abrutissant à force de musique, de danse et d’amusement, et qu’il saurait se faire aimer et désirer comme une drogue. Le show business, le jeu, la publicité,

👍296😢3😱2🤓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RenaudCamusTelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,517,539 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Renaud Camus” (@RenaudCamusTelegram), 2,867 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RenaudCamusTelegram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.