Channel name was changed to «ᖇe𐓣ɑ𝗋ꪱᜒ 🎀 рест»

Channel
ᖇe𐓣ɑ𝗋ꪱᜒ 🎀 рест
@Renar1111
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
282subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001940544404 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Renar1111 |
| Description | 𔘓 вся инфа в закрепе !! |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Renar1111 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 282 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 282 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:21 | 283 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 21 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 108
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,204 reactions across 13 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 294 | 24.4% | |
| 💘 | 220 | 18.3% | |
| custom 5323350898099903789 | 207 | 17.2% | |
| 💋 | 106 | 8.80% | |
| custom 5220068389308864615 | 70 | 5.81% | |
| 🔥 | 64 | 5.32% | |
| custom 5447579008910780785 | 54 | 4.49% | |
| custom 5240458140956256867 | 49 | 4.07% | |
| 💅 | 46 | 3.82% | |
| 😇 | 32 | 2.66% | |
| ❤🔥 | 26 | 2.16% | |
| 🕊 | 15 | 1.25% | |
| custom 5231366584248853213 | 8 | 0.664% | |
| 💊 | 7 | 0.581% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 0.332% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.083% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.083% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,204reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2025 to 4 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 544757900891078078517🍓9custom 52404581409562568678💘5custom 53233508980999037894
👽Ayase Momo В прошлый раз я так и не закончила арт с ней исправляюсь 🫶
custom 532335089809990378961💘33custom 544757900891078078526🍓6custom 52404581409562568674
Напом этот пост все ещё актуален
custom 524045814095625686729🍓12custom 544757900891078078510custom 53233508980999037896💘2
🌺 Стадики Меня в последнее время оч заинтересовала субкультура гяру...И ДА Я ЗНАЮ ЧТО ЭТО НЕ СОВСЕМ ТРУ КАНОН ГАРУ но бтв все ещё существуют разные подстили, так что все равно считается!? Решила целое лето их рисовать, НО НЕ КАЖДЫЙ ДЕНЬ, а по желанию 🥹 + хочу наконец-то сформировать свой стиль, а то он скачет чаще чем отписки в этом канале
🍓52custom 532335089809990378930💘26custom 52404581409562568677custom 54475790089107807851
😨: p-chan, what have u done?
custom 532335089809990378965💘33🍓19💊5
🌺 Цветочки
🍓51💘30💅17🐳3custom 53233508980999037893👻1💊1💋1
Прив ку че кд
😇31🍓12💘10custom 53233508980999037896
🌸 Коллаб с @niksskns #коллаб
💋61💘31custom 532335089809990378922🍓11❤🔥2🎉1🔥1custom 52404581409562568671
😝😝
🔥63🍓25💘23custom 52200683893088646155💅3💋3custom 53233508980999037891
Video, posted without a caption
🍓47💋17custom 522006838930886461514custom 52313665842488532134💅2💘1
коммишкa для моего бф❤️ #коммишн
custom 522006838930886461543❤🔥23🕊15💘4custom 52313665842488532132🍓1😇1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Renar1111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 600,169 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᖇe𐓣ɑ𝗋ꪱᜒ 🎀 рест” (@Renar1111), 282 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Renar1111.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.