Channel
@RemarkAnnouncements
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6,445subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002286930953 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RemarkAnnouncements |
| Created | 13 November 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RemarkAnnouncements |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 6,445 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 6,446 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 6,449 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 6,455 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 6,457 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 6,463 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 6,465 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 6,471 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 6,473 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 13 November 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
188 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5884421824804034323 | 90 | 47.9% | |
| custom 5884513831593449473 | 65 | 34.6% | |
| custom 5883966669939808879 | 33 | 17.6% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2024 to 1 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🛠 The remarkpanel.com domain will be down for the next 20 minutes due to nameserver changing. ☑️ This has been resolved, thank you. If you are having issues connecting please try change your VPN location or if you didn't already have one enabled, enable one. This will bypass the DNS caching.
custom 588442182480403432331
📜 The application system for Remark Services is now completed! Thank you all for your patience! To apply you can use the @RemarkApplyBot to apply for an invite code. Please remember that applications are reviewed by humans and can take usually a maximum of 12 hours or can sometimes be as quick as 30 minutes.
custom 588451383159344947313custom 58839666699398088795custom 58844218248040343235
Video, posted without a caption
custom 588442182480403432316custom 58839666699398088797custom 58845138315934494737
ㅤ 📣 If you was not already aware: The E2EE chat system is released for public testing at remarkpanel.com! 🛠 As of 25th Feb 2025 all chat-test users were wiped from the databases in preparation for beta testing.
custom 588442182480403432318custom 58845138315934494738
ㅤ 🔥 Welcome to Remark Services 🔗Official Links 🤖 Remark Bot - @Remark 🛠 Remark Dev - @RemarkDev - https://remark.gg/ 📣 Remark Announcements - @RemarkAnnouncements ❤️🔥 Panel Website - https://remarkpanel.com/ ❤️ Remark, formally known as Riddance, is a multi-tool service that offers various different features and capabilities - to find out more, please message the bot for the full feature list.
custom 588451383159344947337custom 588396666993980887921custom 588442182480403432320
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @RemarkAnnouncements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 402,413 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@RemarkAnnouncements named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Remark Announcements” (@RemarkAnnouncements), 6,445 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RemarkAnnouncements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.