Channel
@Relationshiptipsx
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,555subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001778565730 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Relationshiptipsx |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 3 October 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Relationshiptipsx |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Happiness_Tipss | 13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (13–0) |
| @Motivational_Story | 12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (12–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 October 2022 to 14 April 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @Happiness_Tipss. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 3,555 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 3,564 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 3,567 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 3,568 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 3,568 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
872 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 394 | 45.2% | |
| ❤ | 389 | 44.6% | |
| 🔥 | 35 | 4.01% | |
| 😁 | 22 | 2.52% | |
| 🤔 | 9 | 1.03% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 0.917% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 0.688% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 0.573% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.344% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.115% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 872reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2022 to 14 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A FEW RULES FOR GOOD RELATIONSHIPS❤️ ▫️Don't constantly demonstrate your superiority over other people. That way you will only make enemies for yourself. If you want to be friends with people, make them feel important around you. ▫️Always notice your own mistakes and faults-and apologize. ▫️To be listened to, it is better to propose than to issue priĸaazy. ▫️Irritation is a signal that a person needs help and sup…
❤14👍5
WHAT IMPORTANT THINGS CAN WE DO FOR OUR LOVED ONES? ♥️ ✨Be there for real. Put aside the phone and focus entirely on spending time together. ✨Listen attentively. Sometimes in a conversation we pay more attention to our reactions, thinking about what and how we will say in response to the other person's remarks, waiting for our turn to speak. ✨Telling the truth. Even if it makes the person feel uncomfortable, tell …
👍12❤8
16 signs to show that you like or love someone : 16: U r always on the phone with him/her till late into the night and when he/she hangs up, you still miss them even when it's just 2 minutes ago 15: You read texts and sms over and over again 14: You walk really slow when you are with them. 13: You feel shy whenever they are around. 11: When you think about them, your heart beats fast and slow at the same time. …
❤44👍33😁21🤔4👎1🔥1
You eat, you're fat. you don't eat, you're a freak. You drink, you're alcoholic. You don't drink, you're a pussy. You read you're a nerd. You don't read, you're stupid. You tell a secret, you're an attention seeker. You don't tell a secret, you're still attention seeking. You let someone in, you're easy. you don't let someone in, you're too uptight. You smoke, you think you're cool. You don't smoke, you are a loser. …
❤17👍3😁1
If You Love Someone For Their Looks: It's Obsession If You Love Someone For Their Kindness: It's Admiration If You Love Someone For Their Money: It's Interest If You Love Someone Because They Love You: It's Empathy If You Are Confused Why You Love This Person: It's Definitely Love. Share @RelationshipTipsx
❤39👍6🔥3
The sad reality is this, not everyone is meant to stay in your life forever. So don’t lose yourself to others, it wasn’t really your fault that things went beyond your control. It’s okay to grieve for a time, cry and write it all out if you want to, there’s nothing wrong with what you’re feeling. But don’t let yourself slip away in the process. Gather yourself up and go redeem yourself. Life is not over yet. The pai…
❤24👍6
Love and Sex Everyone have to talk about this kinda stuff with their Parents, Siblings and also with their Partners. Sex is not Embarrassing and knowing and talking about is not too. Not knowing about it the Embarrassing thing. Sexual connection is a vital aspect of most romantic relationships, but it’s not always as central as people may think. Partners have sex for self-interested reasons—it feels good and can boo…
👍10🔥4❤2
"The guy thinks I'm inattentive and ungrateful"-how do you respond to things like that? It happens that young people in a couple have different ideas about what is going on. You may feel that you are expressing gratitude, but he may not perceive it exactly in the format in which you present it. Therefore, direct communication is extremely important: it is worth talking about everything in as much detail as possible…
❤5👍5
The stages of the passage of love 1. At first there is infatuation, the first stage: hormonal surge, "butterflies in the stomach," "he is the best," lots of bodily pleasure. When the first need for intense contact is satisfied, satiety sets in. This includes the hormonal level. 2. Then follows a slight detachment, when you already want to be alone for a while. This is the second stage. 3. Then comes the cooling, t…
❤9👍5🤔5👏2
⭕️ Hard pills To Swallow.. You can't make everyone happy, No matter How hard you try. Not everyone is going to like you. No Matter How Nice you are. Sometimes Things End Without Any explanation or closure. We Can't Force Someone To Love us, even If We Love Them. You're going to Mess up sometimes. You're Not Perfect. Join @RelationshipTipsx
👍18❤7🤯1🥰1
Having someone Who texts you every day, Motivates you every time, Listens to your problems, Genuinely cares for you, Reminds you to have your food on time, and medicines when you're sick, is a true blessing. Everyone needs such a person in their life, and blessed are those who already have them. ❤️ Share, please.
❤43👍5🥰5
Happiness is the ability to be grateful If you can't be thankful for a sunny day and a cup of coffee today, then buying a COAT tomorrow definitely won't make you happy. You should love what you already have👐🏻 "It would be good if" is the sign of emotional immaturity while "it is" is the reality. Happiness is something that is happening NOW. Cause there may be no tomorrow.
❤36👍19🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Relationshiptipsx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 251,629 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Relationship Tips™💡” (@Relationshiptipsx), 3,555 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Relationshiptipsx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.