Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

❌ Reitschuster ❌ Videos Nachrichten Artikel Bilder Twitter Telegram Instagram YouTube

@Reitschuster

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,709subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001710478619
TypeChannel
Username@Reitschuster
Created29 October 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Reitschuster

Growth

1,7091,7141,711.57 August 2026 — 1,713 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,713 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,714 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,709 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,708–1,715 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 06:561,709-5
7 Aug 2026, 12:551,714+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:461,713no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:371,713first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.3%
avg views ÷ 1,709 subscribers
Avg views / post
347
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total6,944
Reactions total75
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

75 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2837.3%
🔥1418.7%
1114.7%
🤬1114.7%
👏810.7%
👎34.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC33 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

reitschuster.de (Telegram) „Man kann mit den AfD-Anhängern nicht diskutieren“ Das ist der Schluss, den die Absenderin des AfD-kritischen Leserbriefs aus meinem Antwort-Artikel zieht, der große Wellen schlug. Jetzt kamen von ihr: 13 Punkte. Ein Lügenvorwurf. Eine Anstandslektion. Und eine Generalabrechnung mit meinen Lesern. Kommt Ihnen das bekannt vor? Mir kam angesichts von all dem noch ein böser Verdacht: https://

6 Aug 2026, 00:04 UTC202 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

reitschuster.de (Telegram) Darf die Demokratie sich selbst abschaffen, um sich zu „schützen"? Eine Leserin verteidigt die Brandmauer und glaubt, ich verharmlose die AfD. Was sie als Tatsache serviert, ist teils falsch – und wird millionenfach nachgebetet. Hier meine Gegenrede – zum Lesen, Mitnehmen und Weitergeben. https://reitschuster.de/post/afd-brandmauer-ns-vergleich-was-wirklich-stimmt/

5 Aug 2026, 00:24 UTC218 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

reitschuster.de (Telegram) Meine Heimatzeitung verweigert AfD-Mann Todesanzeige – was dahinter steckt. Insider-Blick: Wie Anpasser in Redaktionen nach oben schwimmen. Solches Nachtreten über den Tod hinaus ist leider keine Neuigkeit. Was aber kaum einer kennt: wie solche Medienhäuser von innen funktionieren, wer dort Karriere macht – und warum das zu solchen Entscheidungen führt. https://reitschuster.de/post/meine-h

3

5 Aug 2026, 00:24 UTC205 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

reitschuster.de (Telegram) „Autor:in" Peter Müller ist Chefredakteur der Augsburger Allgemeinen – der Zeitung, die eine Todesanzeige für einen AfD-Kreisrat verweigerte. Er kam vom Spiegel, war Redenschreiber von Ursula von der Leyen. Der Fundi-Genderer leitet heute mit strammer „Haltung" selbst gegenüber Toten eine Zeitung, die mal bürgerlich war – und die gekippt wurde wie so viele andere. Wenn Sie die ganze Geschi

🔥5👎3

4 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈1,510 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🍎 Gestern Abend hat Apple Telegram kurzzeitig aus dem App Store entfernt, weil ein einzelner Benutzer illegale pornografische Inhalte in einen öffentlichen Gruppenchat eingefügt hatte. ⬅️ Telegram wurde innerhalb weniger Stunden wiederhergestellt. Aber ich möchte erklären, was passiert ist – um andere App-Entwickler zu warnen und dazu beizutragen, Online-Communitys vor ähnlichen Angriffen zu schützen. 🧹Da Telegram

👍53

3 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC256 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

reitschuster.de (Telegram) Bundestagsabgeordnete haben allein 2025 insgesamt 1.670 Handys und Tablets für 1,5 Millionen Euro auf Staatskosten bestellt. Manche gleich neun, andere griffen noch schnell nach der Abwahl zu. Welche Parteien pro Kopf am meisten zugreifen, werden Sie nicht erraten — und das System dahinter macht erst recht sprachlos. https://reitschuster.de/post/wie-bundestagsabgeordnete-ihr-steuergeld-in-

1

2 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC280 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

reitschuster.de (Telegram) Warum die Falschen regieren – und wie ich es selbst fast einer wurde. Hausbesuche mit Kuchen. Eine Delegiertenversammlung. Und die Erkenntnis, die mich nie mehr losgelassen hat: Unser politisches System versagt nicht — das Versagen ist das System. Merkel hat es zur Staatsräson erhoben. Und ich muss Ihnen etwas gestehen: Ich war mal mittendrin. Aber nur kurz. Und vor ihr. https://reitschust

1 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC377 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Linksextremisten haben in Schwerin ein Mitglied der Generation Deutschland angegriffen. Ein Video zeigt, wie die Antifa den GD-Mitgliedern den Weg versperrt, ihnen dann hinterherjagt und ruft: „Kommt doch! Ich denke, Ihr seid jung, deutsch, kampfbereit. Kommt doch!“ Ein weiteres Video zeigt die Eskalation, es fliegt ein Gegenstand, Glas klirrt. Hinterher ist der Hamburger GD-Landesvorsitzende Michael Schumann verletz

🤬11🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC283 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

reitschuster.de (Telegram) Linke Burda-Erben kastrieren den „Focus“. Der neue Chef kommt vom „Spiegel" – kein Witz. Das Magazin hatte einst fast eine Million Käufer. Heute sind es auf dem Papier noch 192.000 — und es werden weniger. Zufall? Nein. Nach 16 Jahren beim „Focus“ schäme ich mich heute für ihn. https://reitschuster.de/post/linke-burda-erben-kastrieren-den-focus/

👍7🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC335 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

reitschuster.de (Telegram) Warum die AfD wie Lepra ist. Ein Sportgericht tritt zurück – im Namen der politischen Reinheitslehre. Zehn Jahre Ehrenamt, eine Verdienstnadel, kein einziger Vorfall – und trotzdem wird ein Schiedsrichter zum Aussätzigen. Weil er in der falschen Partei ist. Nicht mal der Verband wollte so weit gehen. Wie kommt es zu diesem Übereifer, zu diesem Hass von unten? Und kommt Ihnen das alles gena

🔥3

30 Jul 2026, 19:41 UTC331 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

reitschuster.de (Telegram) Ceuta: Wenn Richter sich zu Schleusern machen. Migranten überrennen spanische Küstenstadt – und unsere Medien framen dreist. Ein Gerichtsurteil. Eine vorhersehbare Folge. Vier Tote, zwanzig Vermisste — und Spaniens linke Regierung sieht kein Risiko. Was die Tagesschau darüber berichtet, ist fast noch empörender als das Ereignis selbst. https://reitschuster.de/post/ceuta-wenn-richter-sich-z

🔥4

30 Jul 2026, 10:56 UTC329 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

reitschuster.de (Telegram) Afghanistan-Abschiebung: Demos für Täter, Schweigen für Opfer. Steuerfinanzierter Protest, willige Reporter – wie sie die Parallel-Realität konstruieren. Für Straftäter gehen sie auf die Straße. Für deren Opfer? Kein Wort. Was uns in diesem Land als „Moral“ verkauft wird – und wer dafür Sendezeit bekommt – ist einfach nicht mehr zu fassen. Doch man kann etwas dagegen tun. https://reitschus

👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Reitschuster. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 440,746 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“❌ Reitschuster ❌ Videos Nachrichten Artikel Bilder Twitter Telegram Instagram YouTube” (@Reitschuster), 1,709 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Reitschuster.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.