SEX STORY

Channel
Рисовач | Референсы | Рисование и Digital Art
@References_tgg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,797subscribers
-1,257 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001455099690 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @References_tgg |
| Description | Первый канал с полезными референсами для художников! Связь : @mister_krabsik |
| Created | 10 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/References_tgg |
Topic
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 24,797 | -153 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 24,950 | -55 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 25,005 | -54 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 25,059 | -61 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 25,120 | -33 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 25,153 | -47 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 25,200 | -119 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 25,319 | -54 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 25,373 | -42 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:06 | 25,415 | -60 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 25,475 | -16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 25,491 | -24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 25,515 | -36 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 25,551 | -17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 25,568 | -21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 25,589 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 25,601 | -17 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 25,618 | -18 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 25,636 | -39 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 25,675 | first reading |
Engagement
484 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.639%
- avg views ÷ 24,797 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 158
- 119 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.976%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 119
- of 484 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 44 of 119 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 484 (5 August 2026 – 3 October 2026) |
| Views total | 18,852 |
| Reactions total | 67 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Oct 2026, 06:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈17,700
- Videos
- ≈2,510
- Links
- ≈961
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2h 38m
- Average length
- 34s
Measured directly from 276 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
306 reactions across 197 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 284 | 92.8% | |
| ✍ | 22 | 7.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 201 of the 484 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 306 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 484 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
❤️🩹Туториал на брови Оцени мой нюдс
❤2
🤯 4 ЛЯМА ДОЛЛАРОВ С 200 БАКСОВ НА STAKE! Стример оформил нереальный завоз в слотах на STAKE 🥩и нарезки с этим моментом разлетелись по всему интернету! 💸 Не смотри завозы через экран, лови заносы сам с помощью супер-бонуса от Stake! Для быстрого успешного старта забирай бонус новичка в виде 200% на первый депозит 💲 Только на Stake: ✨Тысячи слотов ✨Игры с живыми дилерами и эксклюзивные Stake Originals механики ✨Ежен…
❤1
Оцени мой нюдс
Делаем карандаш для тушевки ✏️ Оцени мой нюдс
Video message, posted without a caption
Глаз Бога 18+ 👁 - тот самый легендарный бот, который с помощью нейросетевого анализа находит приватные фотки и переписки девушек в слитых в DarkNet базах данных из социальных сетей. Даю ссылочку: @GlazBogaBot Найди интим фотки VK, INST и TG любой шаболды👆🏻🥵
❤1
LOVE 🖤
❤1
🔖Учимся рисовать тело Полезно? Оцени мой нюдс
❤3
Рисуем женскую одежду Красиво? Оцени мой нюдс
🔞Дрочите. У вас 3 минуты!💦 https://t.me/+-UjE_2vIVRhkZmVi
🍆Скоро удалю: Порнушка с Дошик
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 484 posts we hold for @References_tgg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@References_tgg edited 31 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 1 September 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@venom22rr · 3,9182 postsПланета Экстрима🏂
@ExtremeForFun · 5,7991 postМемули от Мамули
@MemsForMams · 3,9491 postWorld of Guns | Мир Оружия
@WorldLoveGuns · 18,8101 postАххх, Какая Женщина!
@axkakaRwomen · 18,2341 postԿꤣ𐌻ꤌγተ
@chillimout · 4,9351 postCome to me, baby
@derskko · 5,8051 post!internet!
@internetpasta · 28,7161 postМемасик под пивасик🍻
@membeeeers · 11,1691 post𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐫𝐞
@murdesire · 17,6401 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@swagaplaybot · 107,9798 postsАнекдоты😂
@anekdoty_smex69 · 75,2285 postsGreen VPN 🌿
@greenvpn_rbot · 85,3273 postsLove 🖤
@venom22rr · 3,9183 postsАххх, Какая Женщина!
@axkakaRwomen · 18,2342 postsDesireAI(18+)
@desireainew_bot · 173,0472 postsHG Chat AI
@HoneyGirl_neuro_Bot · 15,2802 postsԿꤣ𐌻ꤌγተ
@chillimout · 4,9351 postCome to me, baby
@derskko · 5,8051 postПланета Экстрима🏂
@ExtremeForFun · 5,7991 postЯн: Задания
@ilamiabot · 320,1881 post!internet!
@internetpasta · 28,7161 postLuna AI (18+)
@luna_playbot · 638,5691 postМемасик под пивасик🍻
@membeeeers · 11,1691 postМемули от Мамули
@MemsForMams · 3,9491 post𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐫𝐞
@murdesire · 17,6401 postПодслушано
@p0dslushano69 · 13,7261 postTonPlay
@tonplay · 592,9841 postWorld of Guns | Мир Оружия
@WorldLoveGuns · 18,8101 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@References_tgg named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 30 August 2026 – 30 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@risovanie_referensy · 66,648#1
@reference_st · 20,612#2
@st_drawing · 27,453#3
@risovanie_tg · 29,712#4
@risunkiid · 32,161#5
@referens_anime · 10,083#6
@tg_risovanie · 23,966#7
@references_lib · 14,671#8
@ArtH4b · 10,798#9
@artleague · 7,810#10
@oishur · 18,259#11
@referens129 · 1,382#12
@artfox_reklama · 5,801#13
@bezdnahel · 38,624#14
@posidelkiukotenka · 13,941#15
@artinside_tg · 22,625#16
@mestodlyhydojnika · 3,833#17
@kerelineloli · 2,247#18
@Piar_Hydognikov · 9,320#19
@pinterestforart · 14,499#20
@br1anm7ps · 1,090,016#21
@genshin_impact_ru_off · 478,322#22
@TgEmojis · 1,677,995#23
@genshinmedia · 157,003#24
@LololoshkaUSE · 514,317#25
@dreamgroupe · 116,283#26
@ficbook_official · 294,550#27
@genshindropcom · 486,347#28
@blednayaleaks_hsr · 66,426#29
@serzak7 · 8,962#30
@testsapo · 110,064#31
@arttodraw · 2,779#32
@tgsticker · 793,876#33
@anthonyuly · 233,707#34
@paimon_leaks · 124,772#35
@NIO_CHOM · 47,305#36
@psihologiyaaaaaa0 · 60,569#37
@nabroskiart · 28,937#38
@risui_hudojnik · 6,674#39
@piarartist · 16,563#40
@meow_meow_cute · 115,187#41
@ARCHorny_union · 40,487#42
@I_am_Artist · 11,879#43
@aquaregia_art · 6,495#44
@ex_arte · 83,728#45
@whoisevamensh · 23,082#46
@hengjuu · 18,524#47
@vanileaks · 665,642#48
@mazellovvv · 418,893#49
@windy31room · 539,834#50
@vanihsr · 248,727#51
@honkaistarrailofficial · 233,443#52
@DKNASASAL · 390,717#53
@GenshinRC · 219,703#54
@slivu_genshin_impact · 198,773#55
@drakestudio · 338,823#56
@twitt_ota · 331,915#57
@blednayaleaks_genshin · 110,637#58
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 912,690#59
@honkai_star · 115,481#60
@Zenless_Zone_Zero_Info · 104,366#61
@wutheringwaves · 156,973#62
@your_palettes · 8,214#63
@rebirther_ask · 116,098#64
@impact_genshin · 105,659#65
@Honkai_utechki · 59,705#66
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@st_drawing · 27,453
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 September 2026
@risovanie_tg · 29,712
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 September 2026
@risunkiid · 32,161
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 September 2026
@reference_st · 20,612
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 September 2026
@risovanie_referensy · 66,648
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 20 August 2026
@tg_risovanie · 23,966
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 17 September 2026
@simpleartist · 58,979
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
@kisti_ibis · 42,275
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 1 September 2026
@risunki_srisovk · 27,107
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 September 2026
@lessons_and_tutorials · 27,787
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
@ex_arte · 83,728
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
@nabroskiart · 28,937
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
@samorazvitie_kotiki · 24,179
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 September 2026
@totoro_japan · 27,120
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
@ulovkitg · 22,732
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 19 September 2026
@blocknot_psyh · 31,076
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рисовач | Референсы | Рисование и Digital Art” (@References_tgg), 24,797 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/References_tgg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.