Good Days Are Coming Guys πͺπ»β€οΈ
β€19π2

Channel
@RedeemCodes_hub
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
222,126subscribers
-23,747 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 100,000β316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002186307985 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RedeemCodes_hub |
| Description | Only Made For Maha Real Giveway πβ€οΈβπ©Ή Admin Contact:- @opsyrus/ @Captain_cat_sparrow |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RedeemCodes_hub |
Giveaways & airdrops β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 222,126 | -3,294 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 225,420 | -1,383 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 226,803 | -693 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 227,496 | -518 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 228,014 | -1,052 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 229,066 | -1,077 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 230,143 | -1,643 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 231,786 | -1,180 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 232,966 | -447 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:42 | 233,413 | -416 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:27 | 233,829 | -449 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 234,278 | -293 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 234,571 | -63 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 234,634 | -414 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 235,048 | -467 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 235,515 | -390 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 235,905 | -495 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 236,400 | -855 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 237,255 | -956 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 238,211 | first reading |
53 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 53 (21 July 2026 β 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 70,323 |
| Reactions total | 373 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 11:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 29 September 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2,637 reactions across 53 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 1,135 | 43.0% | |
| β€ | 1,003 | 38.0% | |
| π | 225 | 8.53% | |
| πΏ | 144 | 5.46% | |
| π | 46 | 1.74% | |
| π | 31 | 1.18% | |
| πΎ | 30 | 1.14% | |
| π | 13 | 0.493% | |
| π | 10 | 0.379% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 2,637 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @RedeemCodes_hub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 53 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Good Days Are Coming Guys πͺπ»β€οΈ
β€19π2
+918429572025 Cute girl call number π
β€6π3πΎ2
π° Unlimited money Earning method π° π€ Bot: https://t.me/GmailFarmerBot?start=6018302100 π§ 1 Gmail = 0.3$ π§ 10 Gmail = 3$ π§ 100 Gmail = 30$ You don't have to create an email, they will create it for you π± Payment Verified β
β€19π2π1
Peridiction Games Head Agents Dm Me :- @opsyrus
β€3
Daily Free Redeem Code Lootπ₯π₯ β Step 1: Register Now: Click Here π° Step 2: Redeem Code Niche hai: B28AE1C47545258966944A4F0D2FC365 939194FEDEF938C17D6038F028E54E5A π― Step 3: Go to: Home > Lottery > WinGo 1 Min Choose Big or Small (play wisely!) π€ Step 4: Join 24/7 Prediction Channel: https://t.me/SuperPeridiction https://t.me/SuperPeridiction First Check Then Join ππ
β€3π1
Need More Codes Guys? πβ¨
β€43π16π6π6πΏ2π2
Redeem Codes Giveaway ππ F9VTK Over βCHNVD5 05J2ZK4 Over β83FRWAD B2RSSD over β053DB 54REUBB3 Over βPB8YVKLU 8GNMS8 Over βYET7MTWL1N
β€25π5π2
Sunday Special Giveway Hona Chahiye? π₯Ή
π21β€15π12πΎ2π2
First Person To React 1k Star β Will Get Admin Rights For 48 Hours On this channel πβ€οΈ
β€31πΎ4π3π2
Payment Received π βΆοΈJoin Link - Over Per Day Free Earning 0.1$-1$π₯ Per Refer 0.02$ pay auto
β€11π5πΎ2
Need GUYS FREE DEPOSIT GIVEWAY? 100+ reaction do
π20β€4π4
Freee βΉ100-500 Bot Open This Guys :- Over Then Enter Your Wallet Address And UPI Id Payment Verified βΊοΈ
π6β€4πΎ1
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @RedeemCodes_hub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@RedeemCodes_hub edited 5 posts after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Giveway Type?
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βRedeem Code πβ (@RedeemCodes_hub), 222,126 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RedeemCodes_hub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.